Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.015172194 = product of:
  0.04551658 = sum of:
    0.009977593 = weight(_text_:in in 1954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009977593 = score(doc=1954,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 1954, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1954)
    0.035538986 = weight(_text_:und in 1954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035538986 = score(doc=1954,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 1954, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1954)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Die Schweizerische Landesbibliothek (SLB) hat in den 90er-Jahren eine grundlegende Reorganisation ihrer Strukturen und Arbeitsabläufe in Angriff genommen, um die Qualität ihrer Dienstleistungen zu verbessern. Dazu gehörte auch die Verbesserung des bibliografischen Zugriffs auf die Bestände. In vielen Bereichen mangelte es am Anschluss an die internationalen bibliografischen Standards. Eine Evaluierung dieser Situation führte beispielsweise 1993 zur Einführung von USMARC (jetzt MARC 21) als Austauschformat, zum Ersatz eines auf der Universalen Dezimalklassifikation basierenden Indexierungssystems durch die Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) und die Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK) 1998 und schließlich zur Übernahme der Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) für die alphabetische Katalogisierung. Die letzte Stufe dieser Reorganisation war die Renovierung des Bibliotheksgebäudes selbst, die 1999 begann und 2001 abgeschlossen wurde. Dadurch konnten die Freihandbestände ausgeweitet und verbessert werden; der dafür notwendige Bestandsausbau begann bereits 1997. Dabei sollten auch die Zugriffsmöglichkeiten auf die Bestände verbessert werden. Deshalb führte man 1998 eine Untersuchung zur Auswahl eines Klassifikationssystems durch, das zur Aufstellung der folgenden Freihandbestände geeignet sein sollte: - die Forschungsbibliothek Schweiz (FBCH): eine Sammlung von etwa 30.000 Bänden zu den Themen Kultur, Politik, Geschichte, Umwelt und technische Entwicklung in der Schweiz, - der Lesesaal: eine Sammlung von 10.000 Nachschlagewerken und - das Schweizerische Literaturarchiv: etwa 10.000 literarische Werke von schweizer Autoren und dazu gehörender Sekundärliteratur. Neben der Nutzung als Aufstellungssystem sollte die Klassifikation für zwei weitere Zwecke geeignet sein. Eine sachliche Zugangsmöglichkeit zusätzlich zur Aufstellung sollte durch den elektronischen Bibliothekskatalog angeboten werden, indem die Dokumente durch ein entsprechendes Feld für die Klassifikation im Katalogisierungssystem recherchierbar wurden. Außerdem wurde eine Umstellung der Nationalbibliografie Das Schweizer Buch (SB) zu ihrem hundertsten Geburtstag 2001 geplant. Da die Bibliografie seit langem unverändert geblieben war, sollte ein Klassifikationsschema eingeführt werden, das mit den Empfehlungen der IFLA und der UNESCO übereinstimmte.

0.012000911 = product of:
  0.036002733 = sum of:
    0.015301868 = weight(_text_:in in 5776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015301868 = score(doc=5776,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 5776, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5776)
    0.020700864 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 5776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04140173 = score(doc=5776,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5776, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5776)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The Swiss National Library adopted the DDC as its classification scheme for its open access stacks collections and the structure of its national bibliography, Das Schweizer Buch, in 1999. The paper explains why the library decided to adopt the DDC and how the decision was made. The factors leading to the decision are explained, namely the use of the DDC in Europe and the decision taken by libraries in Germany to translate and adapt DDC22 in German. The article also describes the implementation process of the DDC and the results so far attained at the Swiss National Library.

Footnote

Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System"

Object

DDC-22

0.007262686 = product of:
  0.021788057 = sum of:
    0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 5009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075724614 = score(doc=5009,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 5009, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5009)
    0.014215595 = weight(_text_:und in 5009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014215595 = score(doc=5009,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5009, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5009)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The MACS (Multilingual access to subjects) project is one of the many projects that are currently exploring solutions to multilingual subject access to online catalogs. Its strategy is to develop a Web based link and search interface through which equivalents between three Subject Heading Languages: SWD/RSWK (Schlagwortnormdatei/Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog) for German, RAMEAU (Repertoire d'Autorite-Matière Encyclopedique et Alphabetique Unifie) for French and LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings) for English can be created and maintained, and by which users can access online databases in the language of their choice. Factors that have lead to this approach will be examined and the MACS linking strategy will be explained. The trend to using mapping or linking strategies between different controlled vocabularies to create multilingual access challenges the traditional view of the multilingual thesaurus.

Footnote

Auch in: The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision. Ed. by S.K. Roe u. A.R. Thomas. Binghamton: Haworth 2004.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.0021859813 = product of:
  0.013115887 = sum of:
    0.013115887 = weight(_text_:in in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013115887 = score(doc=2192,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Work in establishing interoperability between Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) in Europe is fairly recent and much work is still needed before users can successfully conduct subject searches across information resources in European libraries. Over the last 25 years many subject heading lists were created or developed from existing ones. Obstacles for effective interoperability have been progressively lifted which has paved the way for interoperability projects to achieve some encouraging results. This paper will look at interoperability approaches in the area of subject indexing tools and will present a short overview of the development of European SHLs. It will then look at the conditions necessary for effective and comprehensive interoperability using the method of linking subject headings, as used by the »Multilingual Access to Subject Headings project« (MACS).

Source

New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a

0.0020823204 = product of:
  0.012493922 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=4825,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

In line with the international flavour of the book, Patrice Landry looks at the multilingual problem. This chapter is mainly concerned with a review of MACS (Multilingual Access to Subjects); a project with the strategy of developing a Web-based link and search interface through which equivalents between three Subject Heading Languages can be created and maintained, and by which users can access online databases in the language of their choice. The three systems in the project are German, French and English language. With the dramatic spread of use of the Web, particularly in the Far East, such projects are going to be increasingly valuable and important.

0.0015457221 = product of:
  0.009274333 = sum of:
    0.009274333 = weight(_text_:in in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009274333 = score(doc=4348,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The paper describes the efforts of three national libraries to use the DDC to improve access in German to the national bibliographies of Switzerland, Germany and Austria. The reasons that led to the use of the DDC for the organisation of the bibliographies and the difficulties in adopting a common approach will be explained. The paper will deal with the approach of using the Second Dewey Summary and the adaptations made to suit the bibliographic requirements of each country's bibliography. The presentation will also explain the challenges of incorporating German requirements in the new outline of the different series of the Deutsche Nationalbibliograpfie and will show how these were successfully resolved.