-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.04
0.037985653 = product of:
0.05697848 = sum of:
0.019957317 = weight(_text_:to in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019957317 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.24104178 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.037021164 = product of:
0.07404233 = sum of:
0.07404233 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07404233 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: From classification to thesauri: making good use of facets
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.04
0.037985653 = product of:
0.05697848 = sum of:
0.019957317 = weight(_text_:to in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019957317 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.24104178 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.037021164 = product of:
0.07404233 = sum of:
0.07404233 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07404233 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: The good use of facets: from classifications to thesauri
-
Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997)
0.02
0.02174836 = product of:
0.03262254 = sum of:
0.014111955 = weight(_text_:to in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014111955 = score(doc=2246,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.17044228 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.018510582 = product of:
0.037021164 = sum of:
0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037021164 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬L'¬évolution des languages documentaires (1993)
0.01
0.00627198 = product of:
0.018815938 = sum of:
0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 7076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018815938 = score(doc=7076,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 7076, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7076)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In the frame of an issue of the Documentaliste devoted to the history of information science in France, the author of this article looks at the development of the two main families of information languages, hierarchical and analytical ones and attempts to discern how and how much this evolution has been influenced by the elements of information searching systems, literature, indexers, designers, users, searching techniques and indexing techniques
-
Maniez, J.: Relationships in thesauri : some critical remarks (1988)
0.00
0.0038805897 = product of:
0.011641769 = sum of:
0.011641769 = weight(_text_:to in 806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011641769 = score(doc=806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.14060771 = fieldWeight in 806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=806)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- After reviewing some fundamental distinctions in relationships (paradigmatic/sytagmatic, interconceptual/ structural) the author proposes a functional approach for investigating the relationships in thesauri. The comparison between three closely related types of semantic fields (lexical, conceptual, thesaural) shows the specific function of relationships in all of these intellectual tools. In information retrieval the two main functions are location of relevant concepts and search of exhaustivity. a clear distinction of these aims can contribute to solving the difficult problem of the choice of 'related terms'. It is suggested that their usefulness relies upon empirical rather than upon semantic proximity. Some practical propositions are amde for the choice and display of relationships in thesauri
