Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"McKeown, K."
  1. Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.01
    0.0063189403 = product of:
      0.025275761 = sum of:
        0.025275761 = product of:
          0.050551523 = sum of:
            0.050551523 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050551523 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  2. McKeown, K.; Daume III, H.; Chaturvedi, S.; Paparrizos, J.; Thadani, K.; Barrio, P.; Biran, O.; Bothe, S.; Collins, M.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Gravano, L.; Jha, R.; King, B.; McInerney, K.; Moon, T.; Neelakantan, A.; O'Seaghdha, D.; Radev, D.; Templeton, C.; Teufel, S.: Predicting the impact of scientific concepts using full-text features (2016) 0.00
    0.0026213971 = product of:
      0.010485589 = sum of:
        0.010485589 = product of:
          0.020971177 = sum of:
            0.020971177 = weight(_text_:research in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020971177 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    New scientific concepts, interpreted broadly, are continuously introduced in the literature, but relatively few concepts have a long-term impact on society. The identification of such concepts is a challenging prediction task that would help multiple parties-including researchers and the general public-focus their attention within the vast scientific literature. In this paper we present a system that predicts the future impact of a scientific concept, represented as a technical term, based on the information available from recently published research articles. We analyze the usefulness of rich features derived from the full text of the articles through a variety of approaches, including rhetorical sentence analysis, information extraction, and time-series analysis. The results from two large-scale experiments with 3.8 million full-text articles and 48 million metadata records support the conclusion that full-text features are significantly more useful for prediction than metadata-only features and that the most accurate predictions result from combining the metadata and full-text features. Surprisingly, these results hold even when the metadata features are available for a much larger number of documents than are available for the full-text features.