Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"O'Neill, E.T."
  1. Lavoie, B.F.; Connaway, L.S.; O'Neill, E.T.: Mapping WorldCat's digital landscape (2007) 0.06
    0.062023588 = product of:
      0.124047175 = sum of:
        0.124047175 = sum of:
          0.079606265 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.079606265 = score(doc=2292,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054668434 = queryNorm
              0.36948 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
          0.044440906 = weight(_text_:22 in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044440906 = score(doc=2292,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054668434 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Digital materials are reshaping library collections and, by extension, traditional library practice for collecting, organizing, and preserving information. This paper uses OCLC's WorldCat bibliographic database as a data source for examining questions relating to digital materials in library collections, including criteria for identifying digital materials algorithmically in MARC21 records; the quantity, types, characteristics, and holdings patterns of digital materials cataloged in WorldCat; and trends in WorldCat cataloging activity for digital materials over time. Issues pertaining to cataloging practice for digital materials and perspectives on digital holdings at the work level also are discussed. Analysis of the aggregate collection represented by the combined digital holdings in WorldCat affords a high-level perspective on historical patterns, suggests future trends, and supplies useful intelligence with which to inform decision making in a variety of areas.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. O'Neill, E.T.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; Kammerer, K.; Vizine-Goetz, D.; Chan, L.M.; El-Hoshy, L.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology (2003) 0.05
    0.049383353 = product of:
      0.09876671 = sum of:
        0.09876671 = product of:
          0.2963001 = sum of:
            0.2963001 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2963001 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.5414978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is by far the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains upward compatibility with LCSH, and any valid set of LC subject headings can be converted to FAST headings.
  3. O'Neill, E.T.: FRBR: Functional requirements for bibliographic records application of the entity-relationship model to Humphry Clinker (2002) 0.04
    0.041971266 = product of:
      0.08394253 = sum of:
        0.08394253 = sum of:
          0.046908442 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046908442 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054668434 = queryNorm
              0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
          0.03703409 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03703409 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.054668434 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The report from the IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) recommended a new approach to cataloging based on an entity-relationship model. This study examined a single work, The Expedition of Humphry Clinker, to determine benefits and drawbacks associated with creating such an entity-relationship model. Humphry Clinker was selected for several reasons - it has been previously studied, it is widely held, and it is a work of mid-level complexity. In addition to analyzing the bibliographic records, many books were examined to ensure the accuracy of the resulting FRBR model. While it was possible to identify works and manifestations, identifying expressions was problematic. Reliable identification of expressions frequently necessitated the examination of the books themselves. Enhanced manifestation records where the roles of editors, illustrators, translators, and other contributors are explicitly identified may be a viable alternative to expressions. For Humphry Clinker, the enhanced record approach avoids the problem of identifying expressions while providing similar functionality. With the enhanced manifestation record, the three remaining entity-relationship structures - works, manifestations, and items - the FRBR model provides a powerful means to improve bibliographic organization and navigation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. O'Neill, E.T.: Copy cataloging practices : use of the call number by Dewey libraries (1995) 0.04
    0.037526753 = product of:
      0.075053506 = sum of:
        0.075053506 = product of:
          0.15010701 = sum of:
            0.15010701 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15010701 = score(doc=2826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. O'Neill, E.T.; McClain, P.: Copy Cataloging Practices : Use of the Call Number by Dewey Libraries (2001) 0.02
    0.023454221 = product of:
      0.046908442 = sum of:
        0.046908442 = product of:
          0.093816884 = sum of:
            0.093816884 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093816884 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Lavoie, B.F.; O'Neill, E.T.: How "World Wide" Is the Web? : Trends in the Internationalization of Web Sites (2001) 0.02
    0.018517045 = product of:
      0.03703409 = sum of:
        0.03703409 = product of:
          0.07406818 = sum of:
            0.07406818 = weight(_text_:22 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07406818 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.10.2002 9:22:14
  7. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2014) 0.02
    0.016584639 = product of:
      0.033169277 = sum of:
        0.033169277 = product of:
          0.066338554 = sum of:
            0.066338554 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.066338554 = score(doc=1970,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.3079 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve searching by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users' searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST prototype complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.6-19
  8. Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: ¬A faceted approach to subject data in the Dublin Core metadata record (2001) 0.02
    0.016417954 = product of:
      0.03283591 = sum of:
        0.03283591 = product of:
          0.06567182 = sum of:
            0.06567182 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06567182 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 4(2001) nos.1/2, S.35-47
  9. Hickey, T.B.; O'Neill, E.T.: FRBRizing OCLC's WorldCat (2004) 0.02
    0.016417954 = product of:
      0.03283591 = sum of:
        0.03283591 = product of:
          0.06567182 = sum of:
            0.06567182 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06567182 = score(doc=5859,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5859, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; 39, nos.3/4
  10. O'Neill, E.T.; Connaway, L.S.; Dickey, T.J.: Estimating the audience level for library resources (2008) 0.01
    0.014813636 = product of:
      0.029627273 = sum of:
        0.029627273 = product of:
          0.059254546 = sum of:
            0.059254546 = weight(_text_:22 in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059254546 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.11.2008 19:22:53
  11. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.01
    0.014072533 = product of:
      0.028145066 = sum of:
        0.028145066 = product of:
          0.05629013 = sum of:
            0.05629013 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05629013 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
  12. Zumer, M.; O'Neill, E.T.: Modeling aggregates in FRBR (2012) 0.01
    0.014072533 = product of:
      0.028145066 = sum of:
        0.028145066 = product of:
          0.05629013 = sum of:
            0.05629013 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05629013 = score(doc=1913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 1913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.456-472
  13. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.01
    0.0129619315 = product of:
      0.025923863 = sum of:
        0.025923863 = product of:
          0.051847726 = sum of:
            0.051847726 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051847726 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001) 0.01
    0.011110227 = product of:
      0.022220453 = sum of:
        0.022220453 = product of:
          0.044440906 = sum of:
            0.044440906 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044440906 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054668434 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22