Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
author's%3a%22Gilliland-swetland%2c A.%22 1
author's%3a%22Gilliland-scotland%2c A.%22 1
authors%3a%22Gilliland-swetland%2c A.%22 1
author's%3a%22Gilliland-seland%2c A.%22 1
authors%3a%22Gilliland-scotland%2c A.%22 1

Pika, J.: Universal Decimal Classification at the ETH-Bibliothek Zürich : a Swiss perspective (2007) 0.00
```
0.001823924 = product of:
  0.003647848 = sum of:
    0.003647848 = product of:
      0.007295696 = sum of:
        0.007295696 = weight(_text_:a in 5899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007295696 = score(doc=5899,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041389145 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5899, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The ETH library has been using the UDC for the past twenty-five years and yet most of the users had almost never taken a single notice about it. The query in today's NEBIS-OPAC (former ETHICS) is based on verbal search with three-lingual descriptors and corresponding related search-terms including e.g. synonyma as well as user-friendly expressions from scientific journals - scientific jargon - to facilitate the dialog with OPAC. A single UDC number, standing behind these descriptors, connects them to the related document-titles, regardless of language. Thus the user actually works with the UDC, without realizing it. This paper describes the experience with this OPAC and the work behind it.

Type

a