-
Costas, R.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Is scientific literature subject to a 'Sell-By-Date'? : a general methodology to analyze the 'durability' of scientific documents (2010)
0.01
0.0060767615 = product of:
0.030383807 = sum of:
0.010127936 = product of:
0.020255871 = sum of:
0.020255871 = weight(_text_:web in 3333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020255871 = score(doc=3333,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03442753 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 3333, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3333)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020255871 = weight(_text_:web in 3333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020255871 = score(doc=3333,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03442753 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 3333, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3333)
0.2 = coord(2/10)
- Abstract
- The study of the citation histories and ageing of documents are topics that have been addressed from several perspectives, especially in the analysis of documents with delayed recognition or sleeping beauties. However, there is no general methodology that can be extensively applied for different time periods or research fields. In this article, a new methodology for the general analysis of the ageing and durability of scientific papers is presented. This methodology classifies documents into three general types: delayed documents, which receive the main part of their citations later than normal documents; flashes in the pan, which receive citations immediately after their publication but are not cited in the long term; and normal documents, documents with a typical distribution of citations over time. These three types of durability have been analyzed considering the whole population of documents in the Web of Science with at least 5 external citations (i.e., not considering self-citations). Several patterns related to the three types of durability have been found and the potential for further research of the developed methodology is discussed.
-
Waltman, L.; Calero-Medina, C.; Kosten, J.; Noyons, E.C.M.; Tijssen, R.J.W.; Eck, N.J. van; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van; Visser, M.S.; Wouters, P.: ¬The Leiden ranking 2011/2012 : data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)
0.00
0.0039736377 = product of:
0.039736375 = sum of:
0.039736375 = weight(_text_:world in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039736375 = score(doc=514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03442753 = queryNorm
0.30028677 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 is a ranking of universities based on bibliometric indicators of publication output, citation impact, and scientific collaboration. The ranking includes 500 major universities from 41 different countries. This paper provides an extensive discussion of the Leiden Ranking 2011/2012. The ranking is compared with other global university rankings, in particular the Academic Ranking of World Universities (commonly known as the Shanghai Ranking) and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. The comparison focuses on the methodological choices underlying the different rankings. Also, a detailed description is offered of the data collection methodology of the Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 and of the indicators used in the ranking. Various innovations in the Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 are presented. These innovations include (1) an indicator based on counting a university's highly cited publications, (2) indicators based on fractional rather than full counting of collaborative publications, (3) the possibility of excluding non-English language publications, and (4) the use of stability intervals. Finally, some comments are made on the interpretation of the ranking and a number of limitations of the ranking are pointed out.
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.00
0.0013193073 = product of:
0.013193073 = sum of:
0.013193073 = product of:
0.039579216 = sum of:
0.039579216 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039579216 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12055935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03442753 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.00
9.328911E-4 = product of:
0.009328911 = sum of:
0.009328911 = product of:
0.027986731 = sum of:
0.027986731 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027986731 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12055935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03442753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
-
Raan, A.F.J. van; Noyons, E.C.M.: Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (2002)
0.00
7.8446604E-4 = product of:
0.00784466 = sum of:
0.00784466 = product of:
0.023533981 = sum of:
0.023533981 = weight(_text_:29 in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023533981 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12110529 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03442753 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
-
Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009)
0.00
7.7740924E-4 = product of:
0.0077740923 = sum of:
0.0077740923 = product of:
0.023322277 = sum of:
0.023322277 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023322277 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12055935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03442753 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:02:48
