Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0058018146 = product of:
  0.0406127 = sum of:
    0.010232029 = weight(_text_:information in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010232029 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
    0.030380672 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030380672 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0909032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Theory of information languages. Decomposition of UDC-notations

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.004760781 = product of:
  0.033325464 = sum of:
    0.01432484 = weight(_text_:information in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01432484 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
    0.019000622 = product of:
      0.057001863 = sum of:
        0.057001863 = weight(_text_:22 in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057001863 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10523519 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030051488 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Footnote

Übers. des Titels: Trends in subject indexing: controlled information languages

Source

Open. 22(1990) no.1, S.11-15

0.00412312 = product of:
  0.02886184 = sum of:
    0.010633436 = weight(_text_:information in 2705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010633436 = score(doc=2705,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2705, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2705)
    0.018228404 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018228404 = score(doc=2705,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0909032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2705, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2705)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

In the documentation of cartographic materials and geographic information (CM), the accessibility by area or subject plays a major role. In contrast to most library documents, title and author are of minor importance in the retrieval process for CM. Most maps do not mention authors or titles at all. In the new generation of cataloguing rules for CM, an area code followed by a code for subject are defined as the main entry. Concerning CM, the present UDC provisions are so cumbersome that the creation of new auxiliary tables for CM was felt necessary. The proposed new tables consist of an auxiliary table of place, with <...> as the identifying mark, and a table for subjects on CM as a special auxiliary table to the existing general auxiliary (084.3). In this article, the new UDC auxiliary tables for CM are summarized and the underlying problems and considerations are given in context

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 16(1991) no.2, S.30-35

0.0033897841 = product of:
  0.023728488 = sum of:
    0.0115762185 = weight(_text_:information in 3963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0115762185 = score(doc=3963,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3963, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3963)
    0.0121522695 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0121522695 = score(doc=3963,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0909032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 3963, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3963)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Content

"1. Introduction Multilingual and crosslingual access to information is receiving more and more attention. Maybe the most important reason for this development is the Internet. There are estimations that about half of its users are people with a mother tongue other than English and that this proportion is growing. Crosslingual access in this context means the possibility to get free text access to information using another (natural) language than the language of the information itself. This type of access is important for users with a good passive knowledge of a language but with only a small active vocabulary of the same language, e.g. a Englishman who can read Russian, but has difficulties in formulating adequate search request in that language. Crosslingual access can also be valuable for monolingual users who can automatically or manually have translations of foreign language documents. The search requests will be translated or converted into the language of the information. Multilingual access assumes that the instruments used for access, the controlled information languages, are available in more than one language. An classic example is the Englishman who uses his English edition of the Universal Decimal Classification to search the catalogue of a library in China, although the classification of the library is done using a Chinese edition. In this case the searching and the classifying results in a notation that is the same irrespective which language edition was used for indexing. Another possibility is the use of a multilingual thesaurus or subject headings list, such the trilingual edition of the Library of Congress Subject Headings built at the Royal Library in Brussels (Belgium) or the Macrothesaurus of the OECD. Here, words are the access points - in one language into which each search request will be converted, or, alternatively, into all the languages involved. Multilingual information languages and guidelines an how to build them are the subject of this paper. Particular attention will be paid to multilingual thesauri."

Source

Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine

0.0030380676 = product of:
  0.042532943 = sum of:
    0.042532943 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042532943 = score(doc=258,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0909032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 258, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=258)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.001841347 = product of:
  0.025778856 = sum of:
    0.025778856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025778856 = score(doc=3926,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.0909032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved

0.0016451596 = product of:
  0.023032233 = sum of:
    0.023032233 = product of:
      0.0690967 = sum of:
        0.0690967 = weight(_text_:22 in 6405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0690967 = score(doc=6405,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10523519 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030051488 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 6405, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6405)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.15-22

0.0015190338 = product of:
  0.021266472 = sum of:
    0.021266472 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021266472 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0909032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.0013571873 = product of:
  0.019000622 = sum of:
    0.019000622 = product of:
      0.057001863 = sum of:
        0.057001863 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057001863 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10523519 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030051488 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330

0.0010232029 = product of:
  0.01432484 = sum of:
    0.01432484 = weight(_text_:information in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01432484 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

NISKO'91: International Conference on Knowledge Organization, Terminology & Information Access Management, Bratislava, 13.-16.5.1991

5.846874E-4 = product of:
  0.008185623 = sum of:
    0.008185623 = weight(_text_:information in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008185623 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Information services and use. 17(1997) nos.2/3, S.133-138

5.1160145E-4 = product of:
  0.00716242 = sum of:
    0.00716242 = weight(_text_:information in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00716242 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR, 1998), the study commissioned by IFLA, brings revolutionary changes in the way we see modern computer catalogues. The catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a copy of a card catalogue, but as an interconnected network of related information. Implications of the new model for the future development of catalogues are discussed. Special attention is given to access points and relationships between entities and the changes those will bring into both the formal and subject cataloguing, and authority files.

4.3851556E-4 = product of:
  0.0061392174 = sum of:
    0.0061392174 = weight(_text_:information in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061392174 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

In this paper, after an introduction about problems of multilingual information languages, the rules and recommendations of the Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri for non-equivalence and partial equivalence of terms in different languages are discussed. Artificial terms are not very useful in searching, because most users are not willing to use a thesaurus to find the right descriptor. On the other hand indexers need guidance on how to index and therefore need a thesaurus with all desirable and necessary relations. It is suggested that bibliographic online systems can take over some of the functions for the searcher from the thesaurus and that a few new relations could be helpful to an indexer

4.3851556E-4 = product of:
  0.0061392174 = sum of:
    0.0061392174 = weight(_text_:information in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061392174 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

The study Functional Requirements for Bibliograpbic Records (FRBR) was commissioned by IFLA and published in 1998. It defines the core functions of a catalogue (and bibliographic records) as a gateway to information. For that purpose an abstract entity-relationship model of a catalogue is proposed. The FRBR model is revolutionary. The (computer) catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a replica of the traditional card catalogue, but rather as a network of connected entities, enabling the user to perform seamlessly all the necessary functions. So far there has been some theoretical discussion of the model and some limited experiments, but there is a lack of research in how to implement this theoretical model in practice, in new-generation catalogues. In this paper some reactions to the model are analysed. The main focus is an consequences of the model for the OPAC interface design, particularly the searching functionality and display of results.

2.923437E-4 = product of:
  0.0040928116 = sum of:
    0.0040928116 = weight(_text_:information in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040928116 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine