Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Schlögl, C."
  1. Dreisiebner, S.; Schlögl, C.: Assessing disciplinary differences in information literacy teaching materials (2019) 0.02 
    0.015069183 = product of:
  0.06027673 = sum of:
    0.06027673 = product of:
      0.0904151 = sum of:
        0.061929494 = weight(_text_:language in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061929494 = score(doc=5495,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.3753932 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
        0.028485604 = weight(_text_:22 in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028485604 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to uncover similarities and differences among emphasized information literacy (IL) skills for the disciplines of political- and social sciences, economics, educational sciences, law sciences, mathematics, life sciences, history and German studies, based on an analysis of IL teaching materials. Design/methodology/approach Eight issues of the German language publication series Erfolgreich recherchieren (Succesful Research Strategies) are compared by using a structuring content analysis. The category system is based on the IL standards and performance indicators of the Association of College and Research Libraries (2000), extended with additional categories. Findings The results, first, suggest that the biggest similarities and differences among the disciplines are found concerning the determination of the nature and extent of the needed information, especially in the area of identifying potential sources of information. Second, some of the disciplines focus more on international sources, whereas others focus on country- and language-specific sources. Third, the criteria to define the appropriate retrieval system differ among the various disciplines. Fourth, approaches to narrow the search results differ among the various disciplines. Fifth, the critical evaluation of sources is addressed in all disciplines but relates to different contexts. Research limitations/implications This approach only addresses one book per discipline out of a German language book series. Further research is needed. Originality/value This paper is unique in its approach and one of few papers on disciplinary differences in IL perception.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  2. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.01 
    0.014989476 = product of:
  0.059957903 = sum of:
    0.059957903 = product of:
      0.08993685 = sum of:
        0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05005701 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
        0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039879844 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Eine englische Version dieses Beitrags erscheint unter dem Titel "International visibility of European and in particular German language publications in library and information science" im Tagungsband des 13. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013). Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-1/iwp-2013-0001/iwp-2013-0001.xml?format=INT.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
  3. Pernik, V.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Web Structure Mining am Beispiel von informationswissenschaftlichen Hochschulinstituten im deutschsprachigen Raum (2006) 0.00 
    0.003832557 = product of:
  0.015330228 = sum of:
    0.015330228 = product of:
      0.045990683 = sum of:
        0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045990683 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:14:29
  4. Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.00 
    0.0033534872 = product of:
  0.013413949 = sum of:
    0.013413949 = product of:
      0.040241845 = sum of:
        0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040241845 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    23. 8.2002 11:51:29
  5. Schlögl, C.: Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft : Gegenstandsbereich und Perspektiven (2014) 0.00 
    0.0033233203 = product of:
  0.013293281 = sum of:
    0.013293281 = product of:
      0.039879844 = sum of:
        0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039879844 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 6.2017 18:04:28

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes