Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Schreiber, M."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Schreiber, M.: ¬A variant of the h-index to measure recent performance (2015) 0.00 
    0.0044959965 = product of:
  0.031471975 = sum of:
    0.024409214 = weight(_text_:web in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024409214 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    The predictive power of the h-index has been shown to depend on citations to rather old publications. This has raised doubts about its usefulness for predicting future scientific achievements. Here, I investigate a variant that considers only recent publications and is therefore more useful in academic hiring processes and for the allocation of research resources. It is simply defined in analogy to the usual h-index, but takes into account only publications from recent years, and it can easily be determined from the ISI Web of Knowledge.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2373-2380
  2. Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies in the highly cited publications indicator (2013) 0.00 
    5.7655195E-4 = product of:
  0.008071727 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=815,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 815, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=815)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1298-1302
  3. Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013) 0.00 
    5.7655195E-4 = product of:
  0.008071727 = sum of:
    0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008071727 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2396-2399
  4. Waltman, L.; Schreiber, M.: On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators (2013) 0.00 
    4.32414E-4 = product of:
  0.0060537956 = sum of:
    0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060537956 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.372-379
  5. Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them (2012) 0.00 
    3.6034497E-4 = product of:
  0.0050448296 = sum of:
    0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050448296 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2062-2073