Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Schreiber, M."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies in the highly cited publications indicator (2013) 0.00 
    0.003223707 = product of:
  0.012894828 = sum of:
    0.012894828 = weight(_text_:information in 815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012894828 = score(doc=815,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 815, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=815)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1298-1302
  2. Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013) 0.00 
    0.003223707 = product of:
  0.012894828 = sum of:
    0.012894828 = weight(_text_:information in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012894828 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2396-2399
  3. Schreiber, M.: ¬A variant of the h-index to measure recent performance (2015) 0.00 
    0.0028207437 = product of:
  0.011282975 = sum of:
    0.011282975 = weight(_text_:information in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011282975 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2373-2380
  4. Waltman, L.; Schreiber, M.: On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators (2013) 0.00 
    0.0024177802 = product of:
  0.009671121 = sum of:
    0.009671121 = weight(_text_:information in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009671121 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.372-379
  5. Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them (2012) 0.00 
    0.0020148167 = product of:
  0.008059267 = sum of:
    0.008059267 = weight(_text_:information in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008059267 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2062-2073