-
Schreiber, M.: Uncertainties and ambiguities in percentiles and how to avoid them (2013)
0.05
0.050925925 = product of:
0.10185185 = sum of:
0.012961932 = weight(_text_:information in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012961932 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.08888992 = sum of:
0.03731138 = weight(_text_:technology in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03731138 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.05157854 = weight(_text_:22 in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05157854 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:52:05
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.640-643
-
Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies in the highly cited publications indicator (2013)
0.02
0.015808811 = product of:
0.031617623 = sum of:
0.012961932 = weight(_text_:information in 815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012961932 = score(doc=815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=815)
0.01865569 = product of:
0.03731138 = sum of:
0.03731138 = weight(_text_:technology in 815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03731138 = score(doc=815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=815)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1298-1302
-
Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013)
0.02
0.015808811 = product of:
0.031617623 = sum of:
0.012961932 = weight(_text_:information in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012961932 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
0.01865569 = product of:
0.03731138 = sum of:
0.03731138 = weight(_text_:technology in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03731138 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2396-2399
-
Schreiber, M.: Empirical evidence for the relevance of fractional scoring in the calculation of percentile rank scores (2013)
0.01
0.01383271 = product of:
0.02766542 = sum of:
0.011341691 = weight(_text_:information in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011341691 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
0.016323728 = product of:
0.032647457 = sum of:
0.032647457 = weight(_text_:technology in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032647457 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.861-867
-
Schreiber, M.: ¬A variant of the h-index to measure recent performance (2015)
0.01
0.01383271 = product of:
0.02766542 = sum of:
0.011341691 = weight(_text_:information in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011341691 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.016323728 = product of:
0.032647457 = sum of:
0.032647457 = weight(_text_:technology in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032647457 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2373-2380
-
Waltman, L.; Schreiber, M.: On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators (2013)
0.01
0.011856608 = product of:
0.023713216 = sum of:
0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00972145 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
0.013991767 = product of:
0.027983533 = sum of:
0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027983533 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.372-379
-
Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them (2012)
0.01
0.0098805055 = product of:
0.019761011 = sum of:
0.008101207 = weight(_text_:information in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008101207 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.011659805 = product of:
0.02331961 = sum of:
0.02331961 = weight(_text_:technology in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02331961 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.047586527 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2062-2073
