Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

Schreiber, M.: Uncertainties and ambiguities in percentiles and how to avoid them (2013) 0.02

0.02138706 = product of:
  0.04277412 = sum of:
    0.04277412 = sum of:
      0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.00616747 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03377341 = queryNorm
          0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
      0.036606647 = weight(_text_:22 in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036606647 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11826873 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03377341 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 3.2013 19:52:05
Language: e

Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 0.00

0.0015418675 = product of:
  0.003083735 = sum of:
    0.003083735 = product of:
      0.00616747 = sum of:
        0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00616747 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies in the highly cited publications indicator (2013) 0.00

0.0015418675 = product of:
  0.003083735 = sum of:
    0.003083735 = product of:
      0.00616747 = sum of:
        0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00616747 = score(doc=815,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 815, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=815)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013) 0.00

0.0015418675 = product of:
  0.003083735 = sum of:
    0.003083735 = product of:
      0.00616747 = sum of:
        0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00616747 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: Restricting the h-index to a citation time window : a case study of a timed Hirsch index (2014) 0.00

0.0015418675 = product of:
  0.003083735 = sum of:
    0.003083735 = product of:
      0.00616747 = sum of:
        0.00616747 = weight(_text_:e in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00616747 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: ¬A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors (2009) 0.00

0.001349134 = product of:
  0.002698268 = sum of:
    0.002698268 = product of:
      0.005396536 = sum of:
        0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 2858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005396536 = score(doc=2858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: Empirical evidence for the relevance of fractional scoring in the calculation of percentile rank scores (2013) 0.00

0.001349134 = product of:
  0.002698268 = sum of:
    0.002698268 = product of:
      0.005396536 = sum of:
        0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005396536 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: ¬A variant of the h-index to measure recent performance (2015) 0.00

0.001349134 = product of:
  0.002698268 = sum of:
    0.002698268 = product of:
      0.005396536 = sum of:
        0.005396536 = weight(_text_:e in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005396536 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index (2009) 0.00

0.0011564007 = product of:
  0.0023128013 = sum of:
    0.0023128013 = product of:
      0.0046256026 = sum of:
        0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046256026 = score(doc=3125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Waltman, L.; Schreiber, M.: On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators (2013) 0.00

0.0011564007 = product of:
  0.0023128013 = sum of:
    0.0023128013 = product of:
      0.0046256026 = sum of:
        0.0046256026 = weight(_text_:e in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046256026 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: ¬An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index (2008) 0.00

9.6366723E-4 = product of:
  0.0019273345 = sum of:
    0.0019273345 = product of:
      0.003854669 = sum of:
        0.003854669 = weight(_text_:e in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003854669 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them (2012) 0.00

9.6366723E-4 = product of:
  0.0019273345 = sum of:
    0.0019273345 = product of:
      0.003854669 = sum of:
        0.003854669 = weight(_text_:e in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003854669 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e

Schreiber, M.: Das Web ist eine Wolke (2009) 0.00
```
5.782003E-4 = product of:
  0.0011564007 = sum of:
    0.0011564007 = product of:
      0.0023128013 = sum of:
        0.0023128013 = weight(_text_:e in 2620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023128013 = score(doc=2620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048544887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03377341 = queryNorm
            0.04764253 = fieldWeight in 2620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Content

"Auf einem Uralt-PC HD-Videos schneiden, Handys mit 500 GByte Speicherplatz ausstatten, Software und Daten auf jedem beliebigen Computer abrufen - das soll Cloud Computing ermöglichen. Und das alles nur über einen Browser sowie einen schnellen Internetanschluss. Was genau verbirgt sich aber hinter diesem Begriff, der seit Monaten durch die Medien wandert?. CHIP erklärt das Prinzip und verrät, ob Cloud Computing nur ein Hype oder die Zukunft ist. Hardware ade: Die Software läuft in jedem Browser Der Grundgedanke beim Cloud Computing ist, dass alle Anwendungen im Web laufen - von einfacher Software bis hin zu kompletten Betriebssystemen. Der User muss sich keine teure Hardware anschaffen, sich keine Gedanken um die Aktualisierung des Systems machen und auch keine Software mehr kaufen. Das klingt nach Zukunftsmusik, aber die Ansätze sind bereits vorhanden. Google zeigt, wie's geht: Office-Tools, E-Mail-Konten, RSS-Reader, ein Kalender und weitere Programme laufen plattformunabhängig im Webbrowser. Alle Programme und Daten lagern auf den Google-Servern und werden je nach Bedarf geladen. Möglich wird das durch riesige Serverparks von Unternehmen wie Microsoft, Google, Amazon oder IBM: Die Anlagen stellen viel mehr Leistung bereit, als sie verbrauchen können.

Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Languages

Types

Themes