Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sigel, A."
  1. Sigel, A.: Informationsintegration mit semantischen Wissenstechnologien (2006) 0.02
    0.019783458 = product of:
      0.07913383 = sum of:
        0.07913383 = weight(_text_:media in 5174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07913383 = score(doc=5174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 5174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5174)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.wim.uni-koeln.de/uploads/media/Tutorium_Informationsintegration_v32_2006-07-02_gesamt.pdf
  2. Sigel, A.: Topic maps in knowledge organization (2003) 0.00
    0.004194235 = product of:
      0.01677694 = sum of:
        0.01677694 = product of:
          0.03355388 = sum of:
            0.03355388 = weight(_text_:research in 4726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03355388 = score(doc=4726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 4726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    There is a natural overlap and complement between Knowledge Organization (KO) and Topic Maps. I am convinced that KO, with its relevant knowledge of an experiences in concept organization, can strongly contribute in this area. Since this ides impacts both the KO and TM communities, this chapter offers an invitation to anyone interested in TMs to draw from the KO background and to KO experts to include the case of KO with TMs in their research.
  3. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995) 0.00
    0.0036699555 = product of:
      0.014679822 = sum of:
        0.014679822 = product of:
          0.029359644 = sum of:
            0.029359644 = weight(_text_:research in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029359644 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    4 working steps taken from a comprehensive empirical model of expert abstracting are studied in order to prepare an explorative implementation of a simulation model. It aims at explaining the knowledge processing activities during professional summarizing. Following the case-based and holistic strategy of qualitative empirical research, the main features of the simulation system were developed by investigating in detail a small but central test case - 4 working steps where an expert abstractor discovers what the paper is about and drafts the topic sentence of the abstract
  4. Sigel, A.: Was leisten Topic Maps? (2001) 0.00
    0.0031456763 = product of:
      0.012582705 = sum of:
        0.012582705 = product of:
          0.02516541 = sum of:
            0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02516541 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt