-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.06
0.063524835 = product of:
0.12704967 = sum of:
0.12704967 = sum of:
0.08466032 = weight(_text_:data in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08466032 = score(doc=3565,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.513453 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238935 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article recording evidence for data values in addition to the values themselves in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata is proposed, with the aim of improving the expressiveness and reliability of those records and metadata. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. Recording the history of changes in data values is also proposed, with the aim of reinforcing recorded evidence. First, evidence that can be recorded is categorized into classes: identifiers of rules or tasks, action descriptions of them, and input and output data of them. Dates of recording values and evidence are an additional class. Then, the relative usefulness of evidence classes and also levels (i.e., the record, data element, or data value level) to which an individual evidence class is applied, is examined. Second, examples that can be viewed as recorded evidence in existing bibliographic records and current cataloging rules are shown. Third, some examples of bibliographic records and descriptive metadata with notes of evidence are demonstrated. Fourth, ways of using recorded evidence are addressed.
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Taniguchi, S.: ¬A system for supporting evidence recording in bibliographic records (2006)
0.01
0.014401014 = product of:
0.028802028 = sum of:
0.028802028 = product of:
0.057604056 = sum of:
0.057604056 = weight(_text_:data in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057604056 = score(doc=282,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recording evidence for data values, in addition to the values themselves, in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata has been proposed in a previous study. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. As a continuation of that study, this article first proposes a scenario in which a cataloger and a system interact with each other in recording evidence in bibliographic records for books, with the aim of minimizing costs and effort in recording evidence. Second, it reports on prototype system development in accordance with the scenario. The system (1) searches a string, corresponding to the data value entered by a cataloger or extracted from the Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) record, within the scanned and optical character recognition (OCR)-converted title page and verso of the title page of an item being cataloged; (2) identifies the place where the string appears within the source of information; (3) identifies the procedure being used to form the value entered or recorded; and finally (4) displays the place and procedure identified for the data value as its candidate evidence. Third, this study reports on an experiment conducted to examine the system's performance. The results of the experiment show the usefulness of the system and the validity of the proposed scenario.
-
Taniguchi, S.: ¬A system for supporting evidence recording in bibliographic records : Part II: what Is valuable evidence for catalogers? (2007)
0.01
0.012471643 = product of:
0.024943287 = sum of:
0.024943287 = product of:
0.049886573 = sum of:
0.049886573 = weight(_text_:data in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049886573 = score(doc=325,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.30255508 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recording evidence for data element values, in addition to the values themselves, in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata is likely to be useful for improving the expressivity and reliability of such records and metadata. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. This article is Part II of a study to explore a way of assisting catalogers in recording evidence in bibliographic records, with the aim of minimizing the costs and effort of doing so. This article begins with a scenario for utilizing recorded evidence to which a cataloger refers for information and understanding of the ways that have been adopted to record data value(s) in a given element. In line with that scenario, the proper content of evidence to be recorded Is first discussed. Second, the functionality of the system developed in Part I is extended and refined to make the system more useful and effective in recording such evidence. Third, the system's performance is experimentally examined, the results of which show its usefulness. And fourth, another system is developed for catalogers to retrieve and display recorded evidence together with bibliographic records in a flexible way.
-
Taniguchi, S.: Design of cataloging rules using conceptual modeling of cataloging process (2004)
0.01
0.007200507 = product of:
0.014401014 = sum of:
0.014401014 = product of:
0.028802028 = sum of:
0.028802028 = weight(_text_:data in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028802028 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a method to design cataloging rules by utilizing conceptual modeling of the cataloging process and also by applying the concept "orientedness." It also proposes a general model for the cataloging process at the conceptual level, which is independent of any situation/system or cataloging code. A design method is made up of the following phases, including the development of a general model. Functional and non-functional requirements are first specified by use of orientedness. Also, cataloger tasks are defined, which are constituents of the cataloging process. Second, a core model is built, which consists of (1) basic event patterns under each task, (2) action patterns applicable to each event, and (3) orientedness involved in an event-action pair. Third, the core model is propagated to reflect the characteristics of an individual data element and also a certain class of materials. Finally, the propagated model is defined by choosing pairs of event and action patterns in the model white referring to orientedness indicated in each event-action pair, in order to match a particular situation. As a result, a set of event-action pairs reflecting specific requirements through categories of orientedness is obtained, and consistent and scalable design can, therefore, be attained.
