Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Vakkari, P."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Pennanen, M.; Vakkari, P.: Students' conceptual structure, search process, and outcome while preparing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.00
    4.9084314E-4 = product of:
      0.011289392 = sum of:
        0.011289392 = product of:
          0.022578783 = sum of:
            0.022578783 = weight(_text_:22 in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022578783 = score(doc=1682,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    This article focuses an analysing students' information needs in terms of conceptual understanding of the topic they propose to study and its consequences for the search process and outcome. The research subjects were 22 undergraduates of psychology attending a seminar for preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. They were asked to make searches in the PsycINFO database for their task in the beginning and end of the seminar. A pre- and postsearch interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded, as were the transaction logs. The results show that during the preparation of research proposals different features of the students' conceptual structure were connected to the search success. Students' ability to cover their conceptual construct by query terms was the major feature affecting search success during the whole process. In the beginning also the number of concepts and the proportion of subconcepts in the construct contributed indirectly via search tactics to retrieving partly useful references. Students' ability to extract new query terms from retrieved items improved search results.
    Date
    19. 6.2003 17:22:33
  2. Vakkari, P.: Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity (2008) 0.00
    3.779547E-4 = product of:
      0.008692958 = sum of:
        0.008692958 = product of:
          0.017385917 = sum of:
            0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 1380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017385917 = score(doc=1380,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 1380, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1380)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores how the use of electronic information resources has influenced scholars' opinion of their work, and how this is connected to their publication productivity. The data consist of a nationwide Web-based survey of the end-users of FinELib, the Finnish Electronic Library, at all universities in Finland. Scholars feel that the use of electronic literature has improved their work considerably in several ways. This influence can be differentiated into two dimensions. The first one is improved accessibility and availability of literature, and the second is more directly related to the content and quality of scholarly work. The perceived improved access is positively associated with the number of international publications produced, among doctoral students in particular. The more direct influence of e-resource use on the content of scholarly work is, however, not associated with publication productivity. The results seem to imply that investments in academic digital libraries are beneficial for the researchers and for the universities.
  3. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.00
    3.470785E-4 = product of:
      0.007982805 = sum of:
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
  4. Vakkari, P.: ¬A theory of the task-based information retrieval process : a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study (2001) 0.00
    2.8984674E-4 = product of:
      0.0066664745 = sum of:
        0.0066664745 = product of:
          0.013332949 = sum of:
            0.013332949 = weight(_text_:1 in 4493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013332949 = score(doc=4493,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23029712 = fieldWeight in 4493, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this article is threefold: (1) to give a summary of empirical results reported earlier on relations between students' problem stages in the course of writing their research proposals for a master's thesis and the information sought, choice of search terms and tactics and relevance assessments of the information found for that task; (2) to show how the findings of the study refine Kuhlthau's model of the information search process in the field of information retrieval (IR); and (3) to construe a tentative theory of a task-based IR process based on the supported hypotheses. The results of the empirical studies show that there is a close connection between the students' problem stages (mental model) in the task performance and the information sought, the search tactics used and the assessment of the relevance and utility of the information found. The corroborated hypotheses expand the ideas in Kuhlthau's model in the domain of IR. A theory of task-based information searching based on the empirical findings of the study is presented.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 57(2001) no.1, S.44-60
  5. Sihvonen, A.; Vakkari, P.: Subject knowledge improves interactive query expansion assisted by a thesaurus (2004) 0.00
    2.7806804E-4 = product of:
      0.0063955644 = sum of:
        0.0063955644 = weight(_text_:und in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063955644 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  6. Eerola, J.; Vakkari, P.: How a general and a specific thesaurus cover expressions in patients' questions and physicians' answers (2008) 0.00
    2.0495258E-4 = product of:
      0.0047139092 = sum of:
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 1732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=1732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 1732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.1, S.131-142