Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)
-
×
classification_ss:"CC 7270"
-
×
subject_ss:"Expert systems (Computer science) / Moral and ethical aspects"
-
×
year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2000 76400 allgemeinen %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskunft%2c information%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 73400 allgemeinen %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskunft%2c information%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 76400 allgemeinen %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskunfts%2c information%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 76400 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskunft%2c information%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 76400 allgemeinen %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskünfte%2c information%22 1
-
Rubel, A.; Castro, C.; Pham, A.: Algorithms and autonomy : the ethics of automated decision systems (2021)
0.00
2.3833357E-4 = product of: 0.0035750032 = sum of: 0.0035750032 = product of: 0.0071500065 = sum of: 0.0071500065 = weight(_text_:information in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0071500065 = score(doc=671,freq=4.0), product of: 0.052134 = queryWeight, product of: 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.029697895 = queryNorm 0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 671, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Content
- Inhalt: Introduction -- Autonomy, agency, and responsibility -- What can agents reasonably endorse? -- What we informationally owe each other -- Freedom, agency, and information technology -- Epistemic paternalism and social media -- Agency laundering and information technologies -- Democratic obligations and technological threats to legitimacy -- Conclusions and caveats