Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Chakrabarti, S.; Dom, B.; Kumar, S.R.; Raghavan, P.; Rajagopalan, S.; Tomkins, A.; Kleinberg, J.M.; Gibson, D.: Neue Pfade durch den Internet-Dschungel : Die zweite Generation von Web-Suchmaschinen (1999) 0.01
    0.0145474505 = product of:
      0.04364235 = sum of:
        0.029623196 = weight(_text_:internet in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029623196 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
        0.014019156 = product of:
          0.042057466 = sum of:
            0.042057466 = weight(_text_:29 in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042057466 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
  2. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.01
    0.012692237 = product of:
      0.03807671 = sum of:
        0.025920296 = weight(_text_:internet in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025920296 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
        0.012156415 = product of:
          0.036469243 = sum of:
            0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036469243 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des klassischen Information Retrieval wurden verschiedene Verfahren für das Ranking sowie die Suche in einer homogenen strukturlosen Dokumentenmenge entwickelt. Die Erfolge der Suchmaschine Google haben gezeigt dass die Suche in einer zwar inhomogenen aber zusammenhängenden Dokumentenmenge wie dem Internet unter Berücksichtigung der Dokumentenverbindungen (Links) sehr effektiv sein kann. Unter den von der Suchmaschine Google realisierten Konzepten ist ein Verfahren zum Ranking von Suchergebnissen (PageRank), das in diesem Artikel kurz erklärt wird. Darüber hinaus wird auf die Konzepte eines Systems namens CiteSeer eingegangen, welches automatisch bibliographische Angaben indexiert (engl. Autonomous Citation Indexing, ACI). Letzteres erzeugt aus einer Menge von nicht vernetzten wissenschaftlichen Dokumenten eine zusammenhängende Dokumentenmenge und ermöglicht den Einsatz von Banking-Verfahren, die auf den von Google genutzten Verfahren basieren.
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  3. Weinstein, A.: Hochprozentig : Tipps and tricks für ein Top-Ranking (2002) 0.01
    0.008727819 = product of:
      0.05236691 = sum of:
        0.05236691 = weight(_text_:internet in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05236691 = score(doc=1083,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.46128747 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die Suchmaschinen haben in den letzten Monaten an ihren Ranking-Algorithmen gefeilt, um Spamern das Handwerk zu erschweren. Internet Pro beleuchtet die Trends im Suchmaschinen-Marketing
    Source
    Internet Professionell. 2002, H.9, S.66-71
  4. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Internet-Suchwerkzeuge im Vergleich (IV) : Relevance Ranking nach "Popularität" von Webseiten: Google (2001) 0.00
    0.0037028994 = product of:
      0.022217397 = sum of:
        0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022217397 = score(doc=5771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  5. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.00
    0.0023155077 = product of:
      0.0138930455 = sum of:
        0.0138930455 = product of:
          0.041679136 = sum of:
            0.041679136 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041679136 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  6. Agosti, M.; Pretto, L.: ¬A theoretical study of a generalized version of kleinberg's HITS algorithm (2005) 0.00
    0.0014603289 = product of:
      0.008761973 = sum of:
        0.008761973 = product of:
          0.026285918 = sum of:
            0.026285918 = weight(_text_:29 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026285918 = score(doc=4,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41