Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Munkelt, J.: Erstellung einer DNB-Retrieval-Testkollektion (2018) 0.03
    0.028678946 = product of:
      0.057357892 = sum of:
        0.057357892 = product of:
          0.114715785 = sum of:
            0.114715785 = weight(_text_:ii in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114715785 = score(doc=4310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050836053 = queryNorm
                0.41776034 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    II, 79 S
  2. Flores, F.N.; Moreira, V.P.: Assessing the impact of stemming accuracy on information retrieval : a multilingual perspective (2016) 0.02
    0.024581954 = product of:
      0.049163908 = sum of:
        0.049163908 = product of:
          0.098327816 = sum of:
            0.098327816 = weight(_text_:ii in 3187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098327816 = score(doc=3187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2745971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050836053 = queryNorm
                0.3580803 = fieldWeight in 3187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4016213 = idf(docFreq=541, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The quality of stemming algorithms is typically measured in two different ways: (i) how accurately they map the variant forms of a word to the same stem; or (ii) how much improvement they bring to Information Retrieval systems. In this article, we evaluate various stemming algorithms, in four languages, in terms of accuracy and in terms of their aid to Information Retrieval. The aim is to assess whether the most accurate stemmers are also the ones that bring the biggest gain in Information Retrieval. Experiments in English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish show that this is not always the case, as stemmers with higher error rates yield better retrieval quality. As a byproduct, we also identified the most accurate stemmers and the best for Information Retrieval purposes.
  3. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.02
    0.017218959 = product of:
      0.034437917 = sum of:
        0.034437917 = product of:
          0.068875834 = sum of:
            0.068875834 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068875834 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050836053 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  4. Martins, A.L.; Souza, R.R.; Ribeiro de Mello, H.: ¬The use of noun phrases in information retrieval : proposing a mechanism for automatic classification (2014) 0.01
    0.0068875835 = product of:
      0.013775167 = sum of:
        0.013775167 = product of:
          0.027550334 = sum of:
            0.027550334 = weight(_text_:22 in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027550334 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050836053 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Mesquita, L.A.P.; Souza, R.R.; Baracho Porto, R.M.A.: Noun phrases in automatic indexing: : a structural analysis of the distribution of relevant terms in doctoral theses (2014) 0.01
    0.0068875835 = product of:
      0.013775167 = sum of:
        0.013775167 = product of:
          0.027550334 = sum of:
            0.027550334 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027550334 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050836053 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. Greiner-Petter, A.; Schubotz, M.; Cohl, H.S.; Gipp, B.: Semantic preserving bijective mappings for expressions involving special functions between computer algebra systems and document preparation systems (2019) 0.01
    0.0068875835 = product of:
      0.013775167 = sum of:
        0.013775167 = product of:
          0.027550334 = sum of:
            0.027550334 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027550334 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780192 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050836053 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22