-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.04
0.042693164 = product of:
0.12807949 = sum of:
0.12807949 = product of:
0.19211923 = sum of:
0.096493624 = weight(_text_:29 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096493624 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.0956256 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0956256 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21. 4.2000 12:41:29
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Peek, R.P.; Pomerantz, J.P.: Electronic scholarly journal publishing (1999)
0.03
0.029283492 = product of:
0.087850474 = sum of:
0.087850474 = product of:
0.1317757 = sum of:
0.047343794 = weight(_text_:science in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047343794 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
0.08443192 = weight(_text_:29 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08443192 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 4.2000 18:48:29
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 33(1998), S.321-355
-
Brown, D.: Electronic publishing in science (1996)
0.02
0.024029551 = product of:
0.07208865 = sum of:
0.07208865 = product of:
0.10813297 = sum of:
0.047824454 = weight(_text_:science in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047824454 = score(doc=4990,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
0.060308516 = weight(_text_:29 in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060308516 = score(doc=4990,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports on a joint Unesco/ICSU conference held in Paris, 19-23 Feb 1996, entitled 'Electronic publishing in science'. Focuses on technical and legal issues, giving the viewpoints of library and information professionals on the one hand, scientists on the other
- Date
- 6. 9.1996 19:29:56
-
Bläsi, C.: Literary studies, business studies - and information science? : Yes, it's a key discipline for the empowerment of publishing studies for the digital age (2015)
0.02
0.021134451 = product of:
0.06340335 = sum of:
0.06340335 = product of:
0.09510502 = sum of:
0.04685821 = weight(_text_:science in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04685821 = score(doc=2986,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.40326554 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
0.048246812 = weight(_text_:29 in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048246812 = score(doc=2986,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 6. 6.2016 10:29:10
- Source
- Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
-
Olivieri, R.: Academic publishing in transition : the academic publishers response (1995)
0.02
0.020796224 = product of:
0.06238867 = sum of:
0.06238867 = product of:
0.093583 = sum of:
0.033816997 = weight(_text_:science in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033816997 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
0.059766002 = weight(_text_:22 in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059766002 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the changing forces of demand, supply and technical change in the field of academic publishing. Covers electronic publishing; the UnCover document delivery service from B.H. Blackwell; the work of Blackwell Science and Blackwell Publishers and electronic pilot studies
- Source
- IATUL proceedings (new series). 4(1995), S.15-22
-
Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998)
0.02
0.016636979 = product of:
0.049910933 = sum of:
0.049910933 = product of:
0.0748664 = sum of:
0.027053596 = weight(_text_:science in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027053596 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.0478128 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0478128 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 16:56:06
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.6, S.507-516
-
Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999)
0.02
0.016636979 = product of:
0.049910933 = sum of:
0.049910933 = product of:
0.0748664 = sum of:
0.027053596 = weight(_text_:science in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027053596 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
0.0478128 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0478128 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 14:43:47
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.6, S.537-543
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.01
0.014557356 = product of:
0.043672066 = sum of:
0.043672066 = product of:
0.0655081 = sum of:
0.023671897 = weight(_text_:science in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023671897 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.0418362 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0418362 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.363-374
-
Medelsohn, L.D.: Chemistry journals : the transition from paper to electronic with lessons for other disciplines (2003)
0.01
0.014345395 = product of:
0.043036185 = sum of:
0.043036185 = product of:
0.064554274 = sum of:
0.028694674 = weight(_text_:science in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028694674 = score(doc=1871,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
0.0358596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0358596 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Chemical information sciences-ranging from subjectspecific bibliometrics to sophisticated theoretical systems for modeling structures and reactions-have historically led in developing new technologies. Hundreds of papers are published or presented at conferences annually in this discipline. One of the more significant conferences at which important research has historically been presented is the Tri-Society Symposium an Chemical Information, an event jointly sponsored by the American Chemical Society, the American Society for Information Science and Technology, and the Special Libraries Association and held every four years. Eight years ago, the theme of this conference was the chemist's workstation; papers were presented an developments enabling chemists to access and process a variety of different types of chemical information from their desktop or laboratory bench. Several of these papers were subsequently published as a Perspectives issue.
- Date
- 19.10.2003 17:17:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.12, S.1136-1137
-
Mizzaro, S.: Quality control in scholarly publishing : a new proposal (2003)
0.01
0.012550069 = product of:
0.037650205 = sum of:
0.037650205 = product of:
0.056475304 = sum of:
0.020290198 = weight(_text_:science in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020290198 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
0.036185108 = weight(_text_:29 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036185108 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 28. 9.2003 11:29:47
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.11, S.989-1005
-
Vaughan, K.T.L.: impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use : Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age (2003)
0.01
0.012550069 = product of:
0.037650205 = sum of:
0.037650205 = product of:
0.056475304 = sum of:
0.020290198 = weight(_text_:science in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020290198 = score(doc=1873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
0.036185108 = weight(_text_:29 in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036185108 = score(doc=1873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 19.10.2003 17:29:16
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.12, S.1149-1152
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009)
0.01
0.012477733 = product of:
0.0374332 = sum of:
0.0374332 = product of:
0.056149796 = sum of:
0.020290198 = weight(_text_:science in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020290198 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
0.0358596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0358596 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:59:25
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.728-739
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.01
0.012477733 = product of:
0.0374332 = sum of:
0.0374332 = product of:
0.056149796 = sum of:
0.020290198 = weight(_text_:science in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020290198 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.0358596 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0358596 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
- Source
- Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
-
Vincent-Lamarre, P.; Boivin, J.; Gargouri, Y.; Larivière, V.; Harnad, S.: Estimating open access mandate effectiveness : the MELIBEA score (2016)
0.01
0.012014776 = product of:
0.036044326 = sum of:
0.036044326 = product of:
0.054066487 = sum of:
0.023912227 = weight(_text_:science in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023912227 = score(doc=3162,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.030154258 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030154258 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- MELIBEA is a directory of institutional open-access policies for research output that uses a composite formula with eight weighted conditions to estimate the "strength" of open access (OA) mandates (registered in ROARMAP). We analyzed total Web of Science-(WoS)-indexed publication output in years 2011-2013 for 67 institutions in which OA was mandated to estimate the mandates' effectiveness: How well did the MELIBEA score and its individual conditions predict what percentage of the WoS-indexed articles is actually deposited in each institution's OA repository, and when? We found a small but significant positive correlation (0.18) between the MELIBEA "strength" score and deposit percentage. For three of the eight MELIBEA conditions (deposit timing, internal use, and opt-outs), one value of each was strongly associated with deposit percentage or latency ([a] immediate deposit required; [b] deposit required for performance evaluation; [c] unconditional opt-out allowed for the OA requirement but no opt-out for deposit requirement). When we updated the initial values and weights of the MELIBEA formula to reflect the empirical association we had found, the score's predictive power for mandate effectiveness doubled (0.36). There are not yet enough OA mandates to test further mandate conditions that might contribute to mandate effectiveness, but the present findings already suggest that it would be productive for existing and future mandates to adopt the three identified conditions so as to maximize their effectiveness, and thereby the growth of OA.
- Date
- 18.10.2016 14:29:07
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.11, S.2815-2828
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.01
0.011954496 = product of:
0.035863485 = sum of:
0.035863485 = product of:
0.053795226 = sum of:
0.023912227 = weight(_text_:science in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023912227 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029883001 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1614-1628
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.01
0.011954496 = product of:
0.035863485 = sum of:
0.035863485 = product of:
0.053795226 = sum of:
0.023912227 = weight(_text_:science in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023912227 = score(doc=2593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.029883001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029883001 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The four major Subject Repositories (SRs), arXiv, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and PubMed Central (PMC), are all important within their disciplines but no previous study has systematically compared how often they are cited in academic publications. In response, the purpose of this paper is to report an analysis of citations to SRs from Scopus publications, 2000-2013. Design/methodology/approach Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four SRs in each year. A random sample of 384 documents citing the four SRs was then visited to investigate the nature of the citations. Findings Each SR was most cited within its own subject area but attracted substantial citations from other subject areas, suggesting that they are open to interdisciplinary uses. The proportion of documents citing each SR is continuing to increase rapidly, and the SRs all seem to attract substantial numbers of citations from more than one discipline. Research limitations/implications Scopus does not cover all publications, and most citations to documents found in the four SRs presumably cite the published version, when one exists, rather than the repository version. Practical implications SRs are continuing to grow and do not seem to be threatened by institutional repositories and so research managers should encourage their continued use within their core disciplines, including for research that aims at an audience in other disciplines. Originality/value This is the first simultaneous analysis of Scopus citations to the four most popular SRs.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Object
- Social Science Research Network
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.01
0.010625067 = product of:
0.0318752 = sum of:
0.0318752 = product of:
0.0956256 = sum of:
0.0956256 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0956256 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.01
0.010519002 = product of:
0.031557005 = sum of:
0.031557005 = product of:
0.047335505 = sum of:
0.023429105 = weight(_text_:science in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023429105 = score(doc=4051,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.20163277 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.0239064 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0239064 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15447356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Special issue on "The reward system of science".
-
Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: Publication fees in open access publishing : sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2012)
0.01
0.01045839 = product of:
0.03137517 = sum of:
0.03137517 = product of:
0.047062755 = sum of:
0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016908498 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
0.030154258 = weight(_text_:29 in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030154258 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 4.2013 18:29:36
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.98-107
-
Björk, B.-C.; Laakso, M.; Welling, P.; Paetau, P.: Anatomy of green open access (2014)
0.01
0.01045839 = product of:
0.03137517 = sum of:
0.03137517 = product of:
0.047062755 = sum of:
0.016908498 = weight(_text_:science in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016908498 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11619691 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.030154258 = weight(_text_:29 in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030154258 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15517308 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044112243 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:10:46
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.237-250
