Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Sherman, R.J.: ¬The electronic book (1993) 0.13
    0.13001361 = product of:
      0.1950204 = sum of:
        0.123434246 = weight(_text_:book in 4568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.123434246 = score(doc=4568,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.55176574 = fieldWeight in 4568, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4568)
        0.07158617 = product of:
          0.14317234 = sum of:
            0.14317234 = weight(_text_:search in 4568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14317234 = score(doc=4568,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.8127996 = fieldWeight in 4568, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4568)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Electronic Book (EB) standard developed by the Sony Corporation. It defines compatibility with ISO 9660, the international standard for file structures on CD-ROM. The EB standard defines search methods according to word search, endword search, keyword search, menu search, multi search, graphic search and linking. Provides a summary of EB players covering the Sony DD1-EX, DD8, DD-DR1 and Panasonic KXEBP1. Discusses EB software
  2. Baksik, C.: Google Book Search library project (2009) 0.11
    0.11071327 = product of:
      0.16606991 = sum of:
        0.1309218 = weight(_text_:book in 3790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1309218 = score(doc=3790,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.58523595 = fieldWeight in 3790, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3790)
        0.03514811 = product of:
          0.07029622 = sum of:
            0.07029622 = weight(_text_:search in 3790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07029622 = score(doc=3790,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.39907667 = fieldWeight in 3790, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3790)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Google Book Search, initially released as Google Print, allows the full-text searching of millions of books supplied by both publishers and libraries. More than 10,000 publishers and dozens of research libraries contribute. The Library Project is significant because it is a partnership with a commercial entity, because Google is funding the digitization, because the project exists on such a massive scale, and because of the speed with which so many works have been and are being scanned. The aspect that has created the most controversy, and legal action, is that some libraries are contributing works that are protected by copyright. A fascinating and critical debate has arisen around copyright protection, the fair use privilege, and what these mean in the digital age.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
    Object
    Google Book Search
  3. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.10
    0.10115771 = product of:
      0.15173656 = sum of:
        0.13800369 = weight(_text_:book in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13800369 = score(doc=4631,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.6168929 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
        0.013732869 = product of:
          0.027465738 = sum of:
            0.027465738 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027465738 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  4. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.08
    0.077493265 = product of:
      0.11623989 = sum of:
        0.061717123 = weight(_text_:book in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061717123 = score(doc=3608,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.27588287 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
        0.054522768 = sum of:
          0.027057027 = weight(_text_:search in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027057027 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.15360467 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.027465738 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027465738 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  5. Catenazzi, N.; Sommaruga, L.: Hyper-book : a formal model for electronic books (1994) 0.07
    0.071264796 = product of:
      0.21379438 = sum of:
        0.21379438 = weight(_text_:book in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21379438 = score(doc=1107,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.9556863 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a model for an electronic book (hyper-book). Hyper-books are electronic books defined on the basis of the paper book metaphor. Gives a formal definition of the hyper-book model as a dynamic system. The model was implemented in a working system, and evaluated with a group of users. The evaluation has confirmed that the adoption of the book metaphor is very effective, as it guarantees ease of using and understanding the system
  6. Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993) 0.07
    0.06693571 = product of:
      0.10040356 = sum of:
        0.076371044 = weight(_text_:book in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076371044 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.34138763 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
        0.02403252 = product of:
          0.04806504 = sum of:
            0.04806504 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806504 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
  7. Clark, T.: On the differences between publishing a book in paper and in the electronic medium (1995) 0.06
    0.062356696 = product of:
      0.18707009 = sum of:
        0.18707009 = weight(_text_:book in 1578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18707009 = score(doc=1578,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.8362255 = fieldWeight in 1578, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1578)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Compares the processes an author's manuscript must go through to become a book, in paper and in electronic form: noting the common and unique features of each of the 2 processes. Proposes definitions of paper book and electronic book; but excludes graphics, art and hypertext from the discussion. Distribution by floppy disc, rather than via network, is considered so as to achieve an even comparison between the 2 publishing processes. Concludes that publishing electronic books is cheaper than publishing paper books on a per book basis. The cost savings are realized by the subprocesses of the publication process that can be eliminated for the electronic medium and by the comparatively small space on a computer disc on to which the equivalent paper book can fit
  8. Hatvany, B.; Lukey, F.: ¬The electronic book and future delights (1990) 0.05
    0.053448595 = product of:
      0.16034578 = sum of:
        0.16034578 = weight(_text_:book in 5537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16034578 = score(doc=5537,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.7167647 = fieldWeight in 5537, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5537)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the UK Serials Group conference on CD-ROM held in York in Sept 89. A light hearted look at the fantastic changes which are going to hit the library world when the printed book is displaced by the Electronic Book. Reviews the last 30 years of developments in the computer world so as to establish trends. Looks at a few current realities, e.g. a single chip which can contain much more information than a large book. It then projects these into the next decade and shows how they will result in the box of delights, called the Electronic Book. Enumerates the advantages of the Electronic Book claiming that the 500 year era of print is drawing to a close. Also looks at the radical changes which are currently beginning in reference libraries, especially in the USA.
  9. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2016) 0.05
    0.052310668 = product of:
      0.078466 = sum of:
        0.05455074 = weight(_text_:book in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05455074 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.2438483 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
        0.023915261 = product of:
          0.047830522 = sum of:
            0.047830522 = weight(_text_:search in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047830522 = score(doc=3226,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.27153727 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Scholars writing books that are widely used to support teaching in higher education may be undervalued because of a lack of evidence of teaching value. Although sales data may give credible evidence for textbooks, these data may poorly reflect educational uses of other types of books. As an alternative, this article proposes a method to search automatically for mentions of books in online academic course syllabi based on Bing searches for syllabi mentioning a given book, filtering out false matches through an extensive set of rules. The method had an accuracy of over 90% based on manual checks of a sample of 2,600 results from the initial Bing searches. Over one third of about 14,000 monographs checked had one or more academic syllabus mention, with more in the arts and humanities (56%) and social sciences (52%). Low but significant correlations between syllabus mentions and citations across most fields, except the social sciences, suggest that books tend to have different levels of impact for teaching and research. In conclusion, the automatic syllabus search method gives a new way to estimate the educational utility of books in a way that sales data and citation counts cannot.
  10. Donaldson, B.; Barrett, H.: Adapting directories to CD-ROM (1996) 0.05
    0.051430937 = product of:
      0.1542928 = sum of:
        0.1542928 = weight(_text_:book in 7283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1542928 = score(doc=7283,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.68970716 = fieldWeight in 7283, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7283)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bob Donaldson, Managing Editor of the directories: The Software Users Year Book and The Computers Users Year Book; published by Learned Information Europe Ltd.; offers some advice to directory publishers who are considering publishing on CD-ROM based on experiences with these 2 titles
  11. Díaz, P.: Usability of hypermedia educational e-books (2003) 0.05
    0.050163757 = product of:
      0.07524563 = sum of:
        0.061717123 = weight(_text_:book in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061717123 = score(doc=1198,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.27588287 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
        0.013528514 = product of:
          0.027057027 = sum of:
            0.027057027 = weight(_text_:search in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027057027 = score(doc=1198,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.15360467 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    To arrive at relevant and reliable conclusions concerning the usability of a hypermedia educational e-book, developers have to apply a well-defined evaluation procedure as well as a set of clear, concrete and measurable quality criteria. Evaluating an educational tool involves not only testing the user interface but also the didactic method, the instructional materials and the interaction mechanisms to prove whether or not they help users reach their goals for learning. This article presents a number of evaluation criteria for hypermedia educational e-books and describes how they are embedded into an evaluation procedure. This work is chiefly aimed at helping education developers evaluate their systems, as well as to provide them with guidance for addressing educational requirements during the design process. In recent years, more and more educational e-books are being created, whether by academics trying to keep pace with the advanced requirements of the virtual university or by publishers seeking to meet the increasing demand for educational resources that can be accessed anywhere and anytime, and that include multimedia information, hypertext links and powerful search and annotating mechanisms. To develop a useful educational e-book many things have to be considered, such as the reading patterns of users, accessibility for different types of users and computer platforms, copyright and legal issues, development of new business models and so on. Addressing usability is very important since e-books are interactive systems and, consequently, have to be designed with the needs of their users in mind. Evaluating usability involves analyzing whether systems are effective, efficient and secure for use; easy to learn and remember; and have a good utility. Any interactive system, as e-books are, has to be assessed to determine if it is really usable as well as useful. Such an evaluation is not only concerned with assessing the user interface but is also aimed at analyzing whether the system can be used in an efficient way to meet the needs of its users - who in the case of educational e-books are learners and teachers. Evaluation provides the opportunity to gather valuable information about design decisions. However, to be successful the evaluation has to be carefully planned and prepared so developers collect appropriate and reliable data from which to draw relevant conclusions.
  12. Catenazzi, N.; Gibb, F.: ¬The publishing process : the hyper-book approach (1995) 0.05
    0.048791673 = product of:
      0.14637502 = sum of:
        0.14637502 = weight(_text_:book in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14637502 = score(doc=3218,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.6543137 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the publishing process, including both paper and electronic publishing, authors, publishers and libraries, and the associated publications channels. Focuses on 1 particular publication channel, which incorporated all the steps involved from the acquisition of a manuscript in a generic markup language, such as SGML, to the presentation of the final electronic publication to the user in the library. The use of a markup language is seen as being an essential component for facilitating the exchange of electronic documents between different systems and applications. In addition, the use of a generic markup language allows several of the steps of the publishing process to be automated. Proposess a system which provides the acquisition and authoring tools required to generate electronic books, together with an appropriate interface and readers' services. The system incorporates 2 notable features: a model of an electronic book (hyper-book) based on the book metaphor; and an environment which supports the semiautomatic generation of electronic books (hyper-book builder) starting from a manuscript which is already available in SGML format
  13. Barker, P.; Richards, S.; Benest, I.: Human-computer interface design for electronic books (1994) 0.04
    0.0436406 = product of:
      0.1309218 = sum of:
        0.1309218 = weight(_text_:book in 1993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1309218 = score(doc=1993,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.58523595 = fieldWeight in 1993, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1993)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic books have become an important mechanism for the dissemination of large volumes of multimedia and hypermedia information. The utility of books of this sort depends very much upon the use of efficient and effective end user interfaces that embed appropriate book related metaphors. Discusses the use of such metaphors and some experiments aimed at evaluating the uitlity of the book metaphor with respect to reading and referencing tasks. Presents a case study (the Book Emulator) which illustrates how information technology can be used to create online books and lectures for use in university teaching. Concludes with a short discussion of some possible future directions of development of electronic books, that add enhancements to the basic book metaphor and which will enable easier and more widespread access to publications of this sort
  14. Tozer, J.: How long is the perfect book? : Bigger really is better. What the numbers say (2019) 0.04
    0.04114475 = product of:
      0.123434246 = sum of:
        0.123434246 = weight(_text_:book in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.123434246 = score(doc=4686,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.55176574 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.1843magazine.com/data-graphic/what-the-numbers-say/how-long-is-the-perfect-book
  15. Zhang, Y.; Kudva, S.: E-books versus print books : readers' choices and preferences across contexts (2014) 0.04
    0.040659726 = product of:
      0.12197917 = sum of:
        0.12197917 = weight(_text_:book in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12197917 = score(doc=1335,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.5452614 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    With electronic book (e-book) sales and readership rising, are e-books positioned to replace print books? This study examines the preference for e-books and print books in the contexts of reading purpose, reading situation, and contextual variables such as age, gender, education level, race/ethnicity, income, community type, and Internet use. In addition, this study aims to identify factors that contribute to e-book adoption. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 2,986 people in the United States from the Reading Habits Survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project (http://pewinternet.org/Shared-Content/Data-Sets/2011/December-2011--Reading-Habits.aspx). While the results of this study support the notion that e-books have firmly established a place in people's lives, due to their convenience of access, e-books are not yet positioned to replace print books. Both print books and e-books have unique attributes and serve irreplaceable functions to meet people's reading needs, which may vary by individual demographic, contextual, and situational factors. At this point, the leading significant predictors of e-book adoption are the number of books read, the individual's income, the occurrence and frequency of reading for research topics of interest, and the individual's Internet use, followed by other variables such as race/ethnicity, reading for work/school, age, and education.
    Object
    E-Book
  16. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books (2017) 0.04
    0.040659726 = product of:
      0.12197917 = sum of:
        0.12197917 = weight(_text_:book in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12197917 = score(doc=3768,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.5452614 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Although peer-review and citation counts are commonly used to help assess the scholarly impact of published research, informal reader feedback might also be exploited to help assess the wider impacts of books, such as their educational or cultural value. The social website Goodreads seems to be a reasonable source for this purpose because it includes a large number of book reviews and ratings by many users inside and outside of academia. To check this, Goodreads book metrics were compared with different book-based impact indicators for 15,928 academic books across broad fields. Goodreads engagements were numerous enough in the arts (85% of books had at least one), humanities (80%), and social sciences (67%) for use as a source of impact evidence. Low and moderate correlations between Goodreads book metrics and scholarly or non-scholarly indicators suggest that reader feedback in Goodreads reflects the many purposes of books rather than a single type of impact. Although Goodreads book metrics can be manipulated, they could be used guardedly by academics, authors, and publishers in evaluations.
  17. Arnold, K.: Virtual transformation : the evolution of publication media (1995) 0.04
    0.036367163 = product of:
      0.10910148 = sum of:
        0.10910148 = weight(_text_:book in 2441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10910148 = score(doc=2441,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.4876966 = fieldWeight in 2441, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2441)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the developing publication forms in the elctronic environment in the light of recent critical perspectives on textuality, historical dimensions of technological change, and practical considerations of economic and political culture. The book in the networked future and transformed into something new, but impediments to change are cultural, not economical or technological
  18. Rada, R.: Hypertext writing and document reuse : the role of a semantic net (1990.) 0.03
    0.029093731 = product of:
      0.08728119 = sum of:
        0.08728119 = weight(_text_:book in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08728119 = score(doc=5911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    When document components are classified and then recombined during document re-use, a semantic net may serve as the classification language. A theory of analogical inheritance, applied to this semantic net, guides the reorganisation of document components. Authors index paragraphs from various sources with node-link-node triples from a semantic net and then use programs to transverse the semantic net and generate various outlines. The program examines node and link names in deciding which path to take. Describes how these techniques helped in the re-use: parts of an existing book to write a new one
  19. Esposito, J.J: ¬The medium, the message and the sceptic (1993) 0.03
    0.029093731 = product of:
      0.08728119 = sum of:
        0.08728119 = weight(_text_:book in 7246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08728119 = score(doc=7246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 7246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7246)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Looks at the possible impact of electronic media on publishing. Suggests that it is the quality of the informational products and not simply the horsepower of the hardware that is necessary to make consumer electronic publishing a reality. It should not be assumed that the future belongs to the technology companies; the same companies that today lead the book business may well take charge of electronic publishing
  20. Matheson, N.: Scholarly communication in the sciences : publishing trends and the role for libraries: conference report (1993) 0.03
    0.029093731 = product of:
      0.08728119 = sum of:
        0.08728119 = weight(_text_:book in 8027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08728119 = score(doc=8027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 8027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8027)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The keynote address focused on the crisis in scholarly communication arising from innovations in publishing: Sessions were devoted to: trends in scientific book publishing; journal publishing; the electronic future; document delivery and alternative access; and the use and effects of electronic media for communication and database searching at Imperial College, London

Years