Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.02
    0.023357583 = product of:
      0.046715166 = sum of:
        0.046715166 = sum of:
          0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015674612 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045820985 = queryNorm
              0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031040555 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045820985 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  2. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.01
    0.010864194 = product of:
      0.021728387 = sum of:
        0.021728387 = product of:
          0.043456774 = sum of:
            0.043456774 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043456774 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  3. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.01
    0.0077601387 = product of:
      0.015520277 = sum of:
        0.015520277 = product of:
          0.031040555 = sum of:
            0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031040555 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
  4. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.01
    0.0077601387 = product of:
      0.015520277 = sum of:
        0.015520277 = product of:
          0.031040555 = sum of:
            0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031040555 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  5. Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017) 0.01
    0.0077601387 = product of:
      0.015520277 = sum of:
        0.015520277 = product of:
          0.031040555 = sum of:
            0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031040555 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.01
    0.006208111 = product of:
      0.012416222 = sum of:
        0.012416222 = product of:
          0.024832444 = sum of:
            0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832444 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  7. Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.01
    0.006208111 = product of:
      0.012416222 = sum of:
        0.012416222 = product of:
          0.024832444 = sum of:
            0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832444 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.01
    0.006208111 = product of:
      0.012416222 = sum of:
        0.012416222 = product of:
          0.024832444 = sum of:
            0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832444 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Ferro, N.; Silvello, G.: NESTOR: a formal model for digital archives (2013) 0.01
    0.0055418126 = product of:
      0.011083625 = sum of:
        0.011083625 = product of:
          0.02216725 = sum of:
            0.02216725 = weight(_text_:m in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02216725 = score(doc=2707,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Archives are an extremely valuable part of our cultural heritage since they represent the trace of the activities of a physical or juridical person in the course of their business. Despite their importance, the models and technologies that have been developed over the past two decades in the Digital Library (DL) field have not been specifically tailored to archives. This is especially true when it comes to formal and foundational frameworks, as the Streams, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios, Societies (5S) model is. Therefore, we propose an innovative formal model, called NEsted SeTs for Object hieRarchies (NESTOR), for archives, explicitly built around the concepts of context and hierarchy which play a central role in the archival realm. NESTOR is composed of two set-based data models: the Nested Sets Model (NS-M) and the Inverse Nested Sets Model (INS-M) that express the hierarchical relationships between objects through the inclusion property between sets. We formally study the properties of these models and prove their equivalence with the notion of hierarchy entailed by archives. We then use NESTOR to extend the 5S model in order to take into account the specific features of archives and to tailor the notion of digital library accordingly. This offers the possibility of opening up the full wealth of DL methods and technologies to archives. We demonstrate the impact of NESTOR on this problem through three example use cases.
  10. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books (2017) 0.01
    0.0055418126 = product of:
      0.011083625 = sum of:
        0.011083625 = product of:
          0.02216725 = sum of:
            0.02216725 = weight(_text_:m in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02216725 = score(doc=3768,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Abella, A.; Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M.; De-Pablos-Heredero, C.: ¬The process of open data publication and reuse (2019) 0.00
    0.0047023837 = product of:
      0.009404767 = sum of:
        0.009404767 = product of:
          0.018809535 = sum of:
            0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 4989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018809535 = score(doc=4989,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4989, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4989)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Laakso, M.; Björk, B.-C.: Delayed open access : an overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature (2013) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=944,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 944, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=944)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Björk, B.-C.; Laakso, M.; Welling, P.; Paetau, P.: Anatomy of green open access (2014) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2016) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: SlideShare presentations, citations, users, and trends : a professional site with academic and educational uses (2017) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: How quickly do publications get read? : the evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles (2018) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=4015,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Abad-García, M.-F.; González-Teruel, A.; González-Llinares, J.: Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at finding spanish articles in repositories (2018) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Zheng, H.; Aung, H.H.; Erdt, M.; Peng, T.-Q.; Raamkumar, A.S.; Theng, Y.-L.: Social media presence of scholarly journals (2019) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 4987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=4987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Wakeling, S.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Fry, J.; Spezi, V.; Willett, P.; Paramita, M.: Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open-access mega-journal authors : results of a large-scale survey (2019) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Shen, W.; Stempfhuber, M.: Embedding discussion in online publications (2013) 0.00
    0.0031349224 = product of:
      0.0062698447 = sum of:
        0.0062698447 = product of:
          0.012539689 = sum of:
            0.012539689 = weight(_text_:m in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012539689 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)