-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.10
0.10015526 = product of:
0.30046576 = sum of:
0.028994884 = product of:
0.08698465 = sum of:
0.08698465 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08698465 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.08698465 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08698465 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.08698465 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08698465 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.08698465 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08698465 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18572637 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044784215 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.0060385168 = weight(_text_:der in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060385168 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(6/18)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000)
0.00
0.0044081723 = product of:
0.026449032 = sum of:
0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044784215 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.0120770335 = weight(_text_:der in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0120770335 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.0098935785 = product of:
0.029680735 = sum of:
0.029680735 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029680735 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Date
- 31. 7.2001 20:22:57
- Footnote
- Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
-
Bruner, J.: From communication to language (1975)
0.00
0.004201838 = product of:
0.025211025 = sum of:
0.0059412974 = weight(_text_:in in 1635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0059412974 = score(doc=1635,freq=22.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19937998 = fieldWeight in 1635, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1635)
0.015276373 = weight(_text_:der in 1635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015276373 = score(doc=1635,freq=20.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.3121784 = fieldWeight in 1635, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1635)
0.003993354 = product of:
0.011980061 = sum of:
0.011980061 = weight(_text_:29 in 1635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011980061 = score(doc=1635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1635)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Abstract
- Bruner war der erste Erforscher des Spracherwerbs von Kindern, der Wittgensteins Problem zu würdigen wußte und eine Antwort darauf vorschlug. Wittgensteins allgemeinem Ansatz folgend, behauptete Bruner, daß das Kind den konventionellen Gebrauch eines sprachlichen Symbols dadurch erwirbt, daß es lernt, an einer Interaktionsform (Lebensform, Szene gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit) teilzunehmen, die es zunächst nichtsprachlich versteht, so daß die Sprache des Erwachsenen in geteilten Erfahrungen verankert werden kann, deren soziale Bedeutung es schon begreift. Eine Schlüsselkomponente dieses Prozesses ist zunächst ein Kind, das Erwachsene als intentionale Wesen auffassen kann, so daß es in bestimmten Kontexten seine Aufmerksamkeit mit ihnen teilen kann. Eine andere Komponente ist jedoch die bereits existierende, äußere soziale Welt, in der das Kind lebt. Um Sprache zu erwerben, muß das Kind in einer Welt leben, die strukturierte soziale Tätigkeiten aufweist, die es verstehen kann, so wie unser hypothetischer Besucher Ungarns das Kaufen von Fahrkarten und das Reisen mit Zügen verstand. Für Kinder bedeutet das häufig die Wiederkehr derselben routinemäßigen, allgemeinen Aktivität, so daß sie erkennen können, wie diese Aktivität aufgebaut ist und wie die verschiedenen sozialen Rollen in ihr funktionieren. Wenn wir am Spracherwerb interessiert sind, muß der Erwachsene außerdem ein neues sprachliches Symbol auf eine solche Weise verwenden, die das Kind als relevant für die gemeinsame Tätigkeit erkennen kann (nämlich im Gegensatz zur unvermittelten Ansprache des Ungarn auf dem Bahnhof). Wenn ein Kind in eine Welt geboren werden würde, in der dieselbe Art von Ereignis nie wiederkehrte, derselbe Gegenstand nie zweimal erschiene und Erwachsene nie dieselben Ausdrücke im selben Kontext verwendeten, dann würde im allgemeinen schwer zu sehen sein, wie dieses Kind eine natürliche Sprache erwerben könnte, welche kognitiven Fähigkeiten es auch immer haben möge. Eine Reihe von Untersuchungen hat gezeigt, daß Kinder nach ersten Fortschritten beim Spracherwerb neue Wörter am besten in Szenen gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit lernen. Oft handelt es sich dabei um solche, die in ihrer täglichen Erfahrung wiederkehren, wie Baden, Füttern, Windelwechseln, Vorlesen und Autofahren. Diese Tätigkeiten sind in vielen Hinsichten analog zu dem Szenario des Fahrkartenkaufs auf einem Bahnhof, insofern das Kind seine eigenen und die Ziele des Erwachsenen in der jeweiligen Situation versteht, was ihm ermöglicht, die Relevanz des Sprachverhaltens des Erwachsenen für diese Ziele zu erschließen. So stellten Tomasello und Todd fest, daß Kinder, die mit ihren Müttern längere Zeit bei Tätigkeiten gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit im Alter zwischen zwölf und achtzehn Monaten verbrachten, mit achtzehn Monaten ein größeres Vokabular hatten. Bei der Sprachverwendung Erwachsener innerhalb dieser Szenen gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit fanden Tomasello und Farrar sowohl korrelative als auch experimentelle Belege für die Hypothese, daß Mütter, die Sprache beim Versuch verwendeten, der Aufmerksamkeit ihrer Kinder zu folgen (d. h. über einen Gegenstand zu sprechen, der schon im Brennpunkt des Interesses und der Aufmerksamkeit des Kindes stand), Kinder mit einem größeren Vokabular hatten als Mütter, die Sprache beim Versuch verwendeten, die Aufmerksamkeit des Kindes auf etwas Neues zu lenken.
- Date
- 29. 5.2003 17:05:34
-
Rahmstorf, G.: Wissensorganisation und Wissensvertextung (1995)
0.00
0.0033861946 = product of:
0.03047575 = sum of:
0.0053741056 = weight(_text_:in in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053741056 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.025101645 = weight(_text_:der in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025101645 = score(doc=1139,freq=6.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5129615 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.3
- Source
- Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen: 3. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO-Sektion einschließlich der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als terminologische Lexika", Weilburg, 27.-29.10.1993. Hrsg.: N. Meder u.a
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018)
0.00
0.002706154 = product of:
0.024355385 = sum of:
0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044784215 = score(doc=4463,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.019876964 = product of:
0.029815445 = sum of:
0.0149750775 = weight(_text_:29 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149750775 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.014840367 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014840367 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- This article considers the relationships among meaning generation, selection, and the dynamics of discourse from a variety of perspectives ranging from information theory and biology to sociology. Following Husserl's idea of a horizon of meanings in intersubjective communication, we propose a way in which, using Shannon's equations, the generation and selection of meanings from a horizon of possibilities can be considered probabilistically. The information-theoretical dynamics we articulate considers a process of meaning generation within cultural evolution: information is imbued with meaning, and through this process, the number of options for the selection of meaning in discourse proliferates. The redundancy of possible meanings contributes to a codification of expectations within the discourse. Unlike hardwired DNA, the codes of nonbiological systems can coevolve with the variations. Spanning horizons of meaning, the codes structure the communications as selection environments that shape discourses. Discursive knowledge can be considered as meta-coded communication that enables us to translate among differently coded communications. The dynamics of discursive knowledge production can thus infuse the historical dynamics with a cultural evolution by adding options, that is, by increasing redundancy. A calculus of redundancy is presented as an indicator whereby these dynamics of discourse and meaning may be explored empirically.
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 11:22:09
-
Malsburg, C. von der: Concerning the neuronal code (2018)
0.00
0.0026449035 = product of:
0.01586942 = sum of:
0.0026870528 = weight(_text_:in in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026870528 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
0.00724622 = weight(_text_:der in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00724622 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
0.0059361467 = product of:
0.01780844 = sum of:
0.01780844 = weight(_text_:22 in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01780844 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Abstract
- The central problem with understanding brain and mind is the neural code issue: understanding the matter of our brain as basis for the phenomena of our mind. The richness with which our mind represents our environment, the parsimony of genetic data, the tremendous efficiency with which the brain learns from scant sensory input and the creativity with which our mind constructs mental worlds all speak in favor of mind as an emergent phenomenon. This raises the further issue of how the neural code supports these processes of organization. The central point of this communication is that the neural code has the form of structured net fragments that are formed by network self-organization, activate and de-activate on the functional time scale, and spontaneously combine to form larger nets with the same basic structure.
- Date
- 27.12.2020 16:56:22
-
Peine, S.: Benutzerfreundlich (2002)
0.00
0.002498278 = product of:
0.022484502 = sum of:
0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050667557 = score(doc=1417,freq=16.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.017417746 = weight(_text_:der in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017417746 = score(doc=1417,freq=26.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.35593814 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Content
- "Kennt doch jeder: Man will in einer fremden Stadt am Automat einen Fahr schein für die Straßenbahn ziehen. Quälende Minuten später steht man immer noch vor dem vertrackten Gerät, nur viel wütender und vor' allem beschämt, weil man sich im Gewirr der Knöpfe, Straßenverzeichnisse und Tarife verheddert hat. Statt der Einzelfahrkarte für einen Erwachsenen hält man schließlich ein 24-Stunden-Familien-Ticket in der Hand. Das Ende vom Lied: Der Benutzer hält sich für technisch vertrottelt. Dabei ist genau das Gegenteil der Fall: Der Entwickler, der sich das Gerät ausdachte, besaß keinerlei Einfühlungsvermögen in die Logik des künftigen Benutzers. Nach leidvoller Erfahrung hat sich inzwischen die Erkenntnis durchgesetzt, dass Benutzerführung gelernt sein muss und sie nicht einfach technikvernarrten Ingenieuren überlassen werden darf An der Stuttgarter Hochschule für Medien gibt es deshalb seit dem Wintersemester 2001/2002 den Bachelor-Studiengang Informationsdesign - Studenten lernen in sieben Semestern, wie man Menschen sinnvoll durch den Informationsdschungel des 21. Jahrhunderts führt. Wie entwickelt man ein Orientierungsssystem für ein Museum, das den Besucher nicht in die Irre führt? Wie kommt ein Kunde am Bankautomaten zügig an sein Geld, ohne dass seine Karte wegen einer irrtümlich gedrückten Taste sofort verschluckt wird? Und wie schreibt man eine Gebrauchsanweisung, die tatsächlich ein technisches Gerät bedienen hilft? Klar, dass es hier nicht nur um Handwerk, sondern vor allem auch um das Verständnis menschlicher Kommunikation geht. In den USA und in Großbritannien ist der Studiengang Informationsdesign längst etabliert. Die Absolventen fänden problemlos Jobs, sagt der Stuttgarter Studiengangsleiter Professor Frank Thissen. Auch hier zu Lande scheint die Wirtschaft sehr angetan. Dabei hat sie das neue Berufsbild geradezu provoziert. Weil neue Produkte meist unter großem Zeitdruck entwickelt werden, sparen viele Firmen am Ende ausgerechnet an den Benutzertests. Auch manche Bedienungsanleitung verunzierte heute nicht die Welt, wäre sie zuvor nur ein einziges Mal mit technisch durchschnittlich begabten Menschen in Berührung gekommen. Welchen Nutzen hat schon ein Benutzerhandbuch, das einem derartige Anleitungen zumutet: "Wenn Sie die Druckformatvorlage eines Dokumentes mit der Druckformatvorlage einer Dokumentvorlage verbinden, ersetzen die Druckformatdefinitionen des Dokuments die gleichnamigen Druckformatdeflnitionen der Dokumentvorlage." Es gibt noch viel zu tun für die Informationsdesign-Studenten. Manchmal allerdings reichte gesunder Menschenverstand schon aus, um Peinlichkeiten zu vermeiden, so wie die Warnung auf dem Beipackzettel eines Schlafmittels: "Achtung, kann Müdigkeit verursachen!"."
- Series
- Der Lämpel
-
Strickland, L.S.: Spying and secret courts in America : new rules and new insights (2003)
0.00
0.0022496143 = product of:
0.020246528 = sum of:
0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 7478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062697898 = score(doc=7478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 7478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7478)
0.013976738 = product of:
0.041930214 = sum of:
0.041930214 = weight(_text_:29 in 7478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041930214 = score(doc=7478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 7478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7478)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.8-10
-
Floridi, L.: Open problems in the philosophy of information (2004)
0.00
0.0021430813 = product of:
0.019287731 = sum of:
0.009404684 = weight(_text_:in in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009404684 = score(doc=2635,freq=18.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.31560543 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.009883047 = product of:
0.02964914 = sum of:
0.02964914 = weight(_text_:29 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02964914 = score(doc=2635,freq=4.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The philosophy of information (PI) is a new area of research with its own field of investigation and methodology. This article, based an the Herbert A. Simon Lecture of Computing and Philosophy I gave at Carnegie Mellon University in 2001, analyses the eighteen principal open problems in PI. Section 1 introduces the analysis by outlining Herbert Simon's approach to PI. Section 2 discusses some methodological considerations about what counts as a good philosophical problem. The discussion centers an Hilbert's famous analysis of the central problems in mathematics. The rest of the article is devoted to the eighteen problems. These are organized into five sections: problems in the analysis of the concept of information, in semantics, in the study of intelligence, in the relation between information and nature, and in the investigation of values.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 9:57:06
29. 8.2004 10:06:12
-
Heit, E.: Knowledge and concept learning (1997)
0.00
0.0019282409 = product of:
0.017354168 = sum of:
0.0053741056 = weight(_text_:in in 1976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053741056 = score(doc=1976,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1976, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1976)
0.011980062 = product of:
0.035940185 = sum of:
0.035940185 = weight(_text_:29 in 1976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035940185 = score(doc=1976,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1976, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1976)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
- Series
- Studies in cognition
-
Smith, L.B.; Samuelson, L.K.: Perceiving and remembering : category stability, variability and development (1997)
0.00
0.0019282409 = product of:
0.017354168 = sum of:
0.0053741056 = weight(_text_:in in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053741056 = score(doc=1978,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
0.011980062 = product of:
0.035940185 = sum of:
0.035940185 = weight(_text_:29 in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035940185 = score(doc=1978,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
- Series
- Studies in cognition
-
Shanks, D.R.: Distributed representations and implicit knowledge : a brief introduction (1997)
0.00
0.0019282409 = product of:
0.017354168 = sum of:
0.0053741056 = weight(_text_:in in 1979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053741056 = score(doc=1979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1979)
0.011980062 = product of:
0.035940185 = sum of:
0.035940185 = weight(_text_:29 in 1979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035940185 = score(doc=1979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1979)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
- Series
- Studies in cognition
-
Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002)
0.00
0.001921298 = product of:
0.017291682 = sum of:
0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582737 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.013708944 = product of:
0.041126832 = sum of:
0.041126832 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041126832 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- This paper suggests a framework and systematic definitions for 6 words commonly used in dthe field of information science: data, information, knowledge, wisdom, inspiration, and intelligence. We intend these definitions to lead to a quantification of information science, a quantification that will enable their measurement, manipulastion, and prediction.
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:22:13
-
Cronin, B.: Bowling alone together : academic writing as distributed cognition (2004)
0.00
0.0018625094 = product of:
0.016762584 = sum of:
0.008775878 = weight(_text_:in in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008775878 = score(doc=2265,freq=12.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.29450375 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.007986708 = product of:
0.023960123 = sum of:
0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023960123 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The twentieth century saw the progressive collectivization of science-dramatic growth in teamwork in general and large-scale collaboration in particular. Cognitive partnering in the conduct of research and scholarship has become commonplace, and this trend is reflected in rates of co-authorship and sub-authorship collaboration. The effects of these developments an academic writing are discussed and theorized in terms of distributed cognition.
- Date
- 6. 6.2004 21:19:29
-
Olivier, P.; Ananiadou, S.; Maeda, T.; Tsujii, J.: Visualisation: mediating the interchange of information from the verbal to the visual domain (1992)
0.00
0.0018394949 = product of:
0.016555455 = sum of:
0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 8839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044784215 = score(doc=8839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 8839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8839)
0.0120770335 = weight(_text_:der in 8839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0120770335 = score(doc=8839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 8839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8839)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Source
- Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
-
Anderson, O.R.: Some interrelationships between constructivist models of learning and current neurobiological theory, with implications for science ieducation (1992)
0.00
0.0016835757 = product of:
0.0151521815 = sum of:
0.007165474 = weight(_text_:in in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165474 = score(doc=2340,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.007986708 = product of:
0.023960123 = sum of:
0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023960123 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Recent advances in the neurosciences have begun to elucidate how some fundamental mechanisms of nervous systems activity can explain human information processing and the acquisition of knowledge. Some of these findings are consistent with a cognitive view of constructivist models of learning and provide additional theoretical support for constructivist applications to science education reform. Current thought at the interface between neurocognitive research and constructivist philosophy is summarized here and discussed in a context of implications for scientific epistemology and conceptual change processes in science education
- Source
- Journal of research in science teaching. 29(1992) no.10, S.1037-1058
-
Bailey, R.L.: Information : the currency of the new millennium (1997)
0.00
0.0016835757 = product of:
0.0151521815 = sum of:
0.007165474 = weight(_text_:in in 5114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165474 = score(doc=5114,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5114, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5114)
0.007986708 = product of:
0.023960123 = sum of:
0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 5114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023960123 = score(doc=5114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5114)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Presents technology changes that are shaking the foundations of the methods previously employed by the library, archival and records management professions. Identifies current problems with what has worked in the past. Predicts what will be happening in the future and what effect it has on a global information society and the way the information professions need to proceed in the coming decades
- Footnote
- Contribution to an issue devoted to papers from the UNESCO conference Info-Ethics: first International Congress on Ethical, Legal and Societal Aspects of Digital Information, held in Monaco, 10-12 March 1997
- Source
- International information and library review. 29(1997) nos.3/4, S.319-331
-
Robertson, G.: What is information? (1996)
0.00
0.001596889 = product of:
0.0143720005 = sum of:
0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044784215 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
0.0098935785 = product of:
0.029680735 = sum of:
0.029680735 = weight(_text_:22 in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029680735 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Discusses information in the context of information resources management arguing that it is an essential resource for every organization but one that needs to be managed better. Examines information as a resource, as an asset, as a commodity, as a rubbish
- Source
- Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.22-23
-
Ketelaar, E.: Can we trust information? (1997)
0.00
0.0015769101 = product of:
0.014192191 = sum of:
0.0062054833 = weight(_text_:in in 5199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062054833 = score(doc=5199,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5199, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5199)
0.007986708 = product of:
0.023960123 = sum of:
0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 5199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023960123 = score(doc=5199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5199)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Reliability and authenticity determine the credibility and usefulness of information. These concepts, developed in different cultures and at different times, are essential for information society and its dependence on trusting information. In the creation and distribution of digital information, conditions should be met to ensure the reliability and authenticity of the information
- Footnote
- Contribution to an issue devoted to papers from the UNESCO conference Info-Ethics: first International Congress on Ethical, Legal and Societal Aspects of Digital Information, held in Monaco, 10-12 March, 1997
- Source
- International information and library review. 29(1997) nos.3/4, S.333-338
-
Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014)
0.00
0.0015483715 = product of:
0.013935343 = sum of:
0.0070098387 = weight(_text_:in in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070098387 = score(doc=1296,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
0.0069255047 = product of:
0.020776514 = sum of:
0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020776514 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
- Date
- 16. 6.2014 19:22:57
