Search (107 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Cole, C.: Activity of understanding a problem during interaction with an 'enabling' information retrieval system : modeling information flow (1999) 0.04
    0.038799785 = product of:
      0.11639935 = sum of:
        0.11639935 = sum of:
          0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031153653 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051022716 = queryNorm
              0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
          0.043768454 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043768454 = score(doc=3675,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051022716 = queryNorm
              0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
          0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04147724 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051022716 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article is about the mental coding processes involved in the flow of 'information' when the user is interacting with an 'enabling' information retrieval system. An 'enabling' IR system is designed to stimulate the user's grasping towards a higher understanding of the information need / problem / task that brought the user to the IR system. C. Shannon's (1949/1959) model of the flow of information and K.R. Popper's (1975) 3 worlds concept are used to diagram the flow of information between the user and system when the user receives a stimulating massage, with particluar emphasis on the decoding and encoding operations involved as the user processes the message. The key difference between the model of information flow proposed here and the linear transmission, receiver-oriented model now in use is that we assume that users of a truly interactive, 'enabling' IR system are primarily message senders, not passive receivers of the message, because they must create a new message back to the system, absed on a reconceptualization of their information need, while they are 'online' interacting with the system
    Date
    22. 5.1999 14:51:49
  2. Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996) 0.03
    0.034698933 = product of:
      0.052048396 = sum of:
        0.03822265 = weight(_text_:im in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03822265 = score(doc=909,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.26501122 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
        0.013825747 = product of:
          0.04147724 = sum of:
            0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04147724 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  3. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.02
    0.022510445 = product of:
      0.06753133 = sum of:
        0.06753133 = product of:
          0.202594 = sum of:
            0.202594 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.202594 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43257114 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  4. Verdi, M.P.; Kulhavy, R.W.; Stock, W.A.; Rittscho, K.A.; Savenye, W.: Why maps improve memory for text : the influence of structural information on working-memory operations (1993) 0.02
    0.018943489 = product of:
      0.056830466 = sum of:
        0.056830466 = product of:
          0.0852457 = sum of:
            0.043768454 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043768454 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
            0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04147724 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In order to test how associated verbal and spatial stimuli are processed in memory, undergraduates studied a reference map as either an intact unit or as a series of individual features, and read a text containing facts related to map features. In Addition, the map was presented either before or after reading the text. Seeing the intact map prior to the text led to better recall of both map information and facts from the text. These results support a dual coding modell, where stimuli such as maps possess a retrieval advantage because they allow simultaneous representation in working memory. This advantage occurs because information from the map can be used to cue retrieval of associated verbal facts, without exceeding the processing constraints of the memorial system
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:18:18
  5. Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.02
    0.018777166 = product of:
      0.056331497 = sum of:
        0.056331497 = product of:
          0.08449724 = sum of:
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
            0.048390117 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048390117 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
    Date
    16. 6.2014 19:22:57
  6. Raban, D.R.; Rafaeli, S.: ¬The effect of source nature and status on the subjective value of information (2006) 0.02
    0.015839845 = product of:
      0.047519535 = sum of:
        0.047519535 = product of:
          0.0712793 = sum of:
            0.036714934 = weight(_text_:online in 5268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036714934 = score(doc=5268,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 5268, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5268)
            0.03456437 = weight(_text_:22 in 5268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456437 = score(doc=5268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5268)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This is an empirical, experimental investigation of the value of information, as perceived through the willingness to purchase information (WTP) and the willingness to sell it (accept payment, WTA). We examined the effects of source nature: expertise versus content, and source status: copy versus exclusive original of information on the WTA-WTP ratio. In an animated computer simulation of a business game, players could maximize their profits by making choices regarding inventory and prices. Participants were offered the chance to bid for buying or selling information regarding the weather that may affect demand. We find, as hypothesized, that the subjective value of information does indeed follow the predictions of endowment effect theory. The ratio of willingness to accept to willingness to purchase (WTA-WTP) recorded for the 294 subjects resembles the ratio common for private goods, rather than the intuitively expected unity. The WTA-WTP ratios diverged from unity more often and in a more pronounced manner for information traded in the original form rather than as a copy of the original, although even for copies the WTA-WTP ratio is still double. The results yield a value of about three for the WTA-WTP ratio for original information whether the source is content or expertise. Copy information received a subjective value that was significantly different (lower) than original information. The implications for both online trading and online sharing of information are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:09:35
  7. Bruner, J.: From communication to language (1975) 0.01
    0.01343007 = product of:
      0.04029021 = sum of:
        0.04029021 = weight(_text_:im in 1635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04029021 = score(doc=1635,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.27934635 = fieldWeight in 1635, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1635)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bruner war der erste Erforscher des Spracherwerbs von Kindern, der Wittgensteins Problem zu würdigen wußte und eine Antwort darauf vorschlug. Wittgensteins allgemeinem Ansatz folgend, behauptete Bruner, daß das Kind den konventionellen Gebrauch eines sprachlichen Symbols dadurch erwirbt, daß es lernt, an einer Interaktionsform (Lebensform, Szene gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit) teilzunehmen, die es zunächst nichtsprachlich versteht, so daß die Sprache des Erwachsenen in geteilten Erfahrungen verankert werden kann, deren soziale Bedeutung es schon begreift. Eine Schlüsselkomponente dieses Prozesses ist zunächst ein Kind, das Erwachsene als intentionale Wesen auffassen kann, so daß es in bestimmten Kontexten seine Aufmerksamkeit mit ihnen teilen kann. Eine andere Komponente ist jedoch die bereits existierende, äußere soziale Welt, in der das Kind lebt. Um Sprache zu erwerben, muß das Kind in einer Welt leben, die strukturierte soziale Tätigkeiten aufweist, die es verstehen kann, so wie unser hypothetischer Besucher Ungarns das Kaufen von Fahrkarten und das Reisen mit Zügen verstand. Für Kinder bedeutet das häufig die Wiederkehr derselben routinemäßigen, allgemeinen Aktivität, so daß sie erkennen können, wie diese Aktivität aufgebaut ist und wie die verschiedenen sozialen Rollen in ihr funktionieren. Wenn wir am Spracherwerb interessiert sind, muß der Erwachsene außerdem ein neues sprachliches Symbol auf eine solche Weise verwenden, die das Kind als relevant für die gemeinsame Tätigkeit erkennen kann (nämlich im Gegensatz zur unvermittelten Ansprache des Ungarn auf dem Bahnhof). Wenn ein Kind in eine Welt geboren werden würde, in der dieselbe Art von Ereignis nie wiederkehrte, derselbe Gegenstand nie zweimal erschiene und Erwachsene nie dieselben Ausdrücke im selben Kontext verwendeten, dann würde im allgemeinen schwer zu sehen sein, wie dieses Kind eine natürliche Sprache erwerben könnte, welche kognitiven Fähigkeiten es auch immer haben möge. Eine Reihe von Untersuchungen hat gezeigt, daß Kinder nach ersten Fortschritten beim Spracherwerb neue Wörter am besten in Szenen gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit lernen. Oft handelt es sich dabei um solche, die in ihrer täglichen Erfahrung wiederkehren, wie Baden, Füttern, Windelwechseln, Vorlesen und Autofahren. Diese Tätigkeiten sind in vielen Hinsichten analog zu dem Szenario des Fahrkartenkaufs auf einem Bahnhof, insofern das Kind seine eigenen und die Ziele des Erwachsenen in der jeweiligen Situation versteht, was ihm ermöglicht, die Relevanz des Sprachverhaltens des Erwachsenen für diese Ziele zu erschließen. So stellten Tomasello und Todd fest, daß Kinder, die mit ihren Müttern längere Zeit bei Tätigkeiten gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit im Alter zwischen zwölf und achtzehn Monaten verbrachten, mit achtzehn Monaten ein größeres Vokabular hatten. Bei der Sprachverwendung Erwachsener innerhalb dieser Szenen gemeinsamer Aufmerksamkeit fanden Tomasello und Farrar sowohl korrelative als auch experimentelle Belege für die Hypothese, daß Mütter, die Sprache beim Versuch verwendeten, der Aufmerksamkeit ihrer Kinder zu folgen (d. h. über einen Gegenstand zu sprechen, der schon im Brennpunkt des Interesses und der Aufmerksamkeit des Kindes stand), Kinder mit einem größeren Vokabular hatten als Mütter, die Sprache beim Versuch verwendeten, die Aufmerksamkeit des Kindes auf etwas Neues zu lenken.
  8. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.01
    0.013412262 = product of:
      0.040236786 = sum of:
        0.040236786 = product of:
          0.06035518 = sum of:
            0.025790809 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025790809 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
            0.03456437 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456437 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
  9. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.01
    0.012289554 = product of:
      0.03686866 = sum of:
        0.03686866 = product of:
          0.110605985 = sum of:
            0.110605985 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110605985 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  10. Hapke, T.: 'In-formation' - Informationskompetenz und Lernen im Zeitalter digitaler Bibliotheken (2005) 0.01
    0.01201222 = product of:
      0.03603666 = sum of:
        0.03603666 = weight(_text_:im in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03603666 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  11. Repo, A.J.: ¬The dual approach to the value of information : an appraisal of use and exchange values (1989) 0.01
    0.01075336 = product of:
      0.03226008 = sum of:
        0.03226008 = product of:
          0.09678023 = sum of:
            0.09678023 = weight(_text_:22 in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09678023 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.5, S.373-383
  12. Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002) 0.01
    0.010643067 = product of:
      0.0319292 = sum of:
        0.0319292 = product of:
          0.09578759 = sum of:
            0.09578759 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09578759 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    22. 2.2007 19:22:13
  13. Neill, S.D.: ¬The dilemma of the subjective in information organization and retrieval (1987) 0.01
    0.009170066 = product of:
      0.027510196 = sum of:
        0.027510196 = product of:
          0.08253059 = sum of:
            0.08253059 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08253059 = score(doc=6401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 6401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6401)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Malheiro da Silva, A.; Ribeiro, F.: Documentation / Information and their paradigms : characterization and importance in research, education, and professional practice (2012) 0.01
    0.009009165 = product of:
      0.027027493 = sum of:
        0.027027493 = weight(_text_:im in 84) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027027493 = score(doc=84,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18739122 = fieldWeight in 84, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=84)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag im Rahmen einer Special Section: Papers from the 10th ISKO Spanish Chapter Conference (X Congreso Capítulo Español de ISKO), Ferrol, Spain, 30 June-1 July, 2011.
  15. Wang, P.: Information behavior and seeking (2011) 0.01
    0.008023808 = product of:
      0.024071421 = sum of:
        0.024071421 = product of:
          0.07221426 = sum of:
            0.07221426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07221426 = score(doc=543,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 543, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=543)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Interactive information seeking, behaviour and retrieval. Eds.: Ruthven, I. u. D. Kelly
  16. Palermiti, R.; Polity, Y.: Desperately seeking user models in information retrieval systems : benefits and limits of cognitivist and marketing approaches (1995) 0.01
    0.00794151 = product of:
      0.023824528 = sum of:
        0.023824528 = product of:
          0.07147358 = sum of:
            0.07147358 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07147358 = score(doc=5595,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 5595, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5595)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a comparison of the benefits and limits of 2 different approaches to users of information systems: the cognitivst point of view which tries to perfect man-machine interfaces by using the 'user model' concept; and the marketing point of view, basically entrepreneurial and commercial. Suggests that research should go beyond the mere structure of information retrieval systems and focus on the analysis of the social and professional practices in which information retrieval tasks are embedded
  17. Robertson, G.: What is information? (1996) 0.01
    0.007680971 = product of:
      0.023042914 = sum of:
        0.023042914 = product of:
          0.06912874 = sum of:
            0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912874 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.22-23
  18. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.01
    0.007680971 = product of:
      0.023042914 = sum of:
        0.023042914 = product of:
          0.06912874 = sum of:
            0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912874 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
  19. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.01
    0.007680971 = product of:
      0.023042914 = sum of:
        0.023042914 = product of:
          0.06912874 = sum of:
            0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912874 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
  20. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.01
    0.007603774 = product of:
      0.022811322 = sum of:
        0.022811322 = product of:
          0.06843396 = sum of:
            0.06843396 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06843396 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22

Years