Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Bates, M.J.: Information (2009) 0.03
    0.03336306 = product of:
      0.1668153 = sum of:
        0.1668153 = weight(_text_:claude in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1668153 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30083624 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035965048 = queryNorm
            0.55450535 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A selection of representative definitions of information is drawn from information science and related disciplines, and discussed and compared. Defining information remains such a contested project that any claim to present a unified, singular vision of the topic would be disingenuous. Seven categories of definitions are described: Communicatory or semiotic; activity-based (i.e., information as event); propositional; structural; social; multitype; and deconstructionist. The impact of Norbert Wiener and Claude Shannon is discussed, as well as the widespread influence of Karl Popper's ideas. The data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) continuum is also addressed. Work of these authors is reviewed: Marcia J. Bates, Gregory Bateson, B.C. Brookes, Michael Buckland, Ian Cornelius, Ronald Day, Richard Derr, Brenda Dervin, Fred Dretske, Jason Farradane, Christopher Fox, Bernd Frohmann, Jonathan Furner, J.A. Goguen, Robert Losee, A.D. Madden, D.M. McKay, Doede Nauta, A.D. Pratt, Frederick Thompson.
  2. ¬The mathematical theory of information (2002) 0.03
    0.030826077 = product of:
      0.15413038 = sum of:
        0.15413038 = product of:
          0.30826077 = sum of:
            0.30826077 = weight(_text_:informationstheorie in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30826077 = score(doc=189,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26637253 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                1.1572543 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    RSWK
    Informationstheorie
    Subject
    Informationstheorie
  3. Warner, J.: Analogies between linguistics and information theory (2007) 0.03
    0.027802551 = product of:
      0.13901275 = sum of:
        0.13901275 = weight(_text_:claude in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13901275 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30083624 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035965048 = queryNorm
            0.4620878 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An analogy is established between the syntagm and paradigm from Saussurean linguistics and the message and messages for selection from the information theory initiated by Claude Shannon. The analogy is pursued both as an end in itself and for its analytic value in understanding patterns of retrieval from full-text systems. The multivalency of individual words when isolated from their syntagm is contrasted with the relative stability of meaning of multiword sequences, when searching ordinary written discourse. The syntagm is understood as the linear sequence of oral and written language. Saussure's understanding of the word, as a unit that compels recognition by the mind, is endorsed, although not regarded as final. The lesser multivalency of multiword sequences is understood as the greater determination of signification by the extended syntagm. The paradigm is primarily understood as the network of associations a word acquires when considered apart from the syntagm. The restriction of information theory to expression or signals, and its focus on the combinatorial aspects of the message, is sustained. The message in the model of communication in information theory can include sequences of written language. Shannon's understanding of the written word, as a cohesive group of letters, with strong internal statistical influences, is added to the Saussurean conception. Sequences of more than one word are regarded as weakly correlated concatenations of cohesive units.
  4. Cornelius, I.: Theorizing information for information science (2002) 0.02
    0.019461786 = product of:
      0.097308934 = sum of:
        0.097308934 = weight(_text_:claude in 4244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097308934 = score(doc=4244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30083624 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035965048 = queryNorm
            0.32346147 = fieldWeight in 4244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4244)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Does information science have a theory of information? There seems to be a tendency within information science to seek a theory of information, but the search is apparently unproductive (Hjoerland, 1998; Saracevic, 1999). This review brings together work from inside and outside the field of information science, showing that other perspectives an information theory could be of assistance. Constructivist claims that emphasize the uniqueness of the individual experience of information, maintaining that there is no information independent of our social practices (Cornelius, 1996a), are also mentioned. Such a position would be echoed in a symbolic interactionist approach. Conventionally, the history of attempts to develop a theory of information date from the publication of Claude Shannon's work in 1948, and his joint publication of that work with an essay by Warren Weaver in 1949 (Shannon & Weaver, 1949/1963). Information science found itself alongside many other disciplines attempting to develop a theory of information (Machlup & Mansfield, 1983). From Weaver's essay stems the claim that the basic concepts of Shannon's mathematical theory of communication, which Shannon later referred to as a theory of information, can be applied in disciplines outside electrical engineering, even in the social sciences.
  5. Capurro, R.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of information (2002) 0.02
    0.01668153 = product of:
      0.08340765 = sum of:
        0.08340765 = weight(_text_:claude in 5079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08340765 = score(doc=5079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30083624 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035965048 = queryNorm
            0.27725267 = fieldWeight in 5079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.364683 = idf(docFreq=27, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5079)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of information as we use it in everyday English, in the sense of knowledge communicated, plays a central role in contemporary society. The development and widespread use of computer networks since the end of World War II, and the emergence of information science as a discipline in the 1950s, are evidence of this focus. Although knowledge and its communication are basic phenomena of every human society, it is the rise of information technology and its global impacts that characterize ours as an information society. It is commonplace to consider information as a basic condition for economic development together with capital, labor, and raw material; but what makes information especially significant at present is its digital nature. The impact of information technology an the natural and social sciences in particular has made this everyday notion a highly controversial concept. Claude Shannon's (1948) "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" is a landmark work, referring to the common use of information with its semantic and pragmatic dimensions, while at the same time redefining the concept within an engineering framework. The fact that the concept of knowledge communication has been designated by the word information seems, prima facie, a linguistic happenstance. For a science like information science (IS), it is of course important how fundamental terms are defined; and in IS, as in other fields, the question of how to define information is often raised. This chapter is an attempt to review the status of the concept of information in IS, with reference also to interdisciplinary trends. In scientific discourse, theoretical concepts are not true or false elements or glimpses of some element of reality; rather, they are constructions designed to do a job in the best possible way. Different conceptions of fundamental terms like information are thus more or less fruitful, depending an the theories (and in the end, the practical actions) they are expected to support. In the opening section, we discuss the problem of defining terms from the perspective of the philosophy of science. The history of a word provides us with anecdotes that are tangential to the concept itself. But in our case, the use of the word information points to a specific perspective from which the concept of knowledge communication has been defined. This perspective includes such characteristics as novelty and relevante; i.e., it refers to the process of knowledge transformation, and particularly to selection and interpretation within a specific context. The discussion leads to the questions of why and when this meaning was designated with the word information. We will explore this history, and we believe that our results may help readers better understand the complexity of the concept with regard to its scientific definitions.
  6. Pirolli, P.: Information foraging theory : adaptive interaction with information (2007) 0.01
    0.012330431 = product of:
      0.061652154 = sum of:
        0.061652154 = product of:
          0.12330431 = sum of:
            0.12330431 = weight(_text_:informationstheorie in 4005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12330431 = score(doc=4005,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26637253 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.46290174 = fieldWeight in 4005, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4005)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    RSWK
    Informationstheorie / Informationsbeschaffung
    Subject
    Informationstheorie / Informationsbeschaffung
  7. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.01
    0.0077964277 = product of:
      0.038982138 = sum of:
        0.038982138 = product of:
          0.077964276 = sum of:
            0.077964276 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077964276 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  8. Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002) 0.01
    0.0067519047 = product of:
      0.033759523 = sum of:
        0.033759523 = product of:
          0.06751905 = sum of:
            0.06751905 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06751905 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    22. 2.2007 19:22:13
  9. Time, quantum and information (2003) 0.01
    0.005449332 = product of:
      0.02724666 = sum of:
        0.02724666 = product of:
          0.05449332 = sum of:
            0.05449332 = weight(_text_:informationstheorie in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05449332 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26637253 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.2045756 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Einen interessanten Vorschlag machen schließlich Ceslav Brukner und Anton Zeilinger von der Universität Wien. Ganz in von Weizsäckers Sinn, die Naturwissenschaft auf Ja-Nein-Aussagen zurückzuführen, streben sie nach einer Herleitung der Quantentheorie aus der Informationstheorie. Ihr Ausgangspunkt ist die Annahme, dass jedes physikalische Objekt einen endlichen Informationsgehalt hat. Da diese Information aber nicht ausreiche, um die Resultate aus allen möglichen Messungen festzulegen, könne eine bestimmte Messung nicht mehr mit Sicherheit vorhergesagt werden. Der Indeterminismus der Quantentheorie ist damit auf ein fundamentaleres Prinzip zurückgeführt. Viele Autoren heben die Bedeutung von Weizsäckers Fragen und Antworten als Quelle der Inspiration und als Herausforderung an die etablierte Wissen schaft hervor, die in ihrer Vorausschau noch nicht an ihr Ende gekommen sei. Dem ist wenig hinzuzufügen."
  10. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.00
    0.0048727677 = product of:
      0.024363838 = sum of:
        0.024363838 = product of:
          0.048727676 = sum of:
            0.048727676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048727676 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
  11. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.00
    0.004823794 = product of:
      0.02411897 = sum of:
        0.02411897 = product of:
          0.04823794 = sum of:
            0.04823794 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04823794 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  12. Meadows, J.: Understanding information (2001) 0.00
    0.0034109373 = product of:
      0.017054686 = sum of:
        0.017054686 = product of:
          0.034109373 = sum of:
            0.034109373 = weight(_text_:22 in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034109373 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    15. 6.2002 19:22:01
  13. Westbrook, L.: Information myths and intimate partner violence : sources, contexts, and consequences (2009) 0.00
    0.0034109373 = product of:
      0.017054686 = sum of:
        0.017054686 = product of:
          0.034109373 = sum of:
            0.034109373 = weight(_text_:22 in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034109373 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:16:44
  14. Atran, S.; Medin, D.L.; Ross, N.: Evolution and devolution of knowledge : a tale of two biologies (2004) 0.00
    0.0029236604 = product of:
      0.014618302 = sum of:
        0.014618302 = product of:
          0.029236604 = sum of:
            0.029236604 = weight(_text_:22 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029236604 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    23. 1.2022 10:22:18
  15. Eiriksson, J.M.; Retsloff, J.M.: Librarians in the 'information age' : promoter of change or provider of stability? (2005) 0.00
    0.0027564536 = product of:
      0.013782267 = sum of:
        0.013782267 = product of:
          0.027564535 = sum of:
            0.027564535 = weight(_text_:22 in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027564535 = score(doc=3012,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:23:22
  16. Raban, D.R.; Rafaeli, S.: ¬The effect of source nature and status on the subjective value of information (2006) 0.00
    0.0024363839 = product of:
      0.012181919 = sum of:
        0.012181919 = product of:
          0.024363838 = sum of:
            0.024363838 = weight(_text_:22 in 5268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024363838 = score(doc=5268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:09:35
  17. San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004) 0.00
    0.0019491069 = product of:
      0.0097455345 = sum of:
        0.0097455345 = product of:
          0.019491069 = sum of:
            0.019491069 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019491069 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 1.2005 18:22:25
  18. Benkowsky, J.; Bühring, B.; Georgy, U.; Linde, F.: Information pricing : the development of a product- and pricing concept for the research centre of the Public Library Cologne (2005) 0.00
    0.0019491069 = product of:
      0.0097455345 = sum of:
        0.0097455345 = product of:
          0.019491069 = sum of:
            0.019491069 = weight(_text_:22 in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019491069 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 9:24:59
  19. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00
    0.0012181919 = product of:
      0.0060909595 = sum of:
        0.0060909595 = product of:
          0.012181919 = sum of:
            0.012181919 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012181919 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12594347 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035965048 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27