-
Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002)
0.07
0.07198863 = product of:
0.14397725 = sum of:
0.14397725 = sum of:
0.04608324 = weight(_text_:data in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04608324 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.09789401 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09789401 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper suggests a framework and systematic definitions for 6 words commonly used in dthe field of information science: data, information, knowledge, wisdom, inspiration, and intelligence. We intend these definitions to lead to a quantification of information science, a quantification that will enable their measurement, manipulastion, and prediction.
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:22:13
-
Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014)
0.07
0.06980942 = product of:
0.13961884 = sum of:
0.13961884 = sum of:
0.09016461 = weight(_text_:data in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09016461 = score(doc=1296,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049454242 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
- Date
- 16. 6.2014 19:22:57
-
Infield, N.: Capitalising on knowledge : if knowledge is power, why don't librarians rule the world? (1997)
0.05
0.05130119 = product of:
0.10260238 = sum of:
0.10260238 = sum of:
0.04608324 = weight(_text_:data in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04608324 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.056519132 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056519132 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While knowledge management is seen to be the biggest thing to hit the information profession since the Internet, the concept is surrounded by confusion. Traces the progress of knowledge on the information continuum which extends from data to informed decision. The reason for which knowledge management has suddenly become inluential is that its principal proponents now are not information professionals but management consultants seeking to retain their intellectual capital. Explains the reasons for this, the practical meaning of knowledge management and what information professionals should be doing to take advantage of the vogue
- Source
- Information world review. 1997, no.130, S.22
-
Meadows, J.: Understanding information (2001)
0.04
0.04488854 = product of:
0.08977708 = sum of:
0.08977708 = sum of:
0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040322836 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049454242 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die moderne Gesellschaft leidet an Reizüberflutung durch Fernsehen, Internet, Zeitschriften aller Art. Jack Meadows, Professor für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft setzt sich mit Definitionen zu Begriffen wie 'Data', 'Information', 'Communication' oder 'Knowledge' auseinander, die für uns alläglich geworden sind. wie verarbeiten wir den Fluss von wichtigen und unwichtigen Informationen, der täglich auf uns einströmt? Welche 'Daten' sind es für uns Wert, gespeichert zu werden, welche vergessen wir nach kurzer Zeit? Wann wird aus Information Wissen oder gar Weisheit? Das Buch ist eine grundlegende Einführung in das weitläufige Thema Information und Wissensmanagement
- Date
- 15. 6.2002 19:22:01
-
Westbrook, L.: Information myths and intimate partner violence : sources, contexts, and consequences (2009)
0.04
0.04488854 = product of:
0.08977708 = sum of:
0.08977708 = sum of:
0.040322836 = weight(_text_:data in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040322836 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
0.049454242 = weight(_text_:22 in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049454242 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Survivors of intimate partner violence face more than information gaps; many face powerful barriers in the form of information myths. Triangulating data from in-depth interviews and community bulletin board postings, this study incorporates insights from survivors, police, and shelter staff to begin mapping the information landscape through which survivors move. An unanticipated feature of that landscape is a set of 28 compelling information myths that prevent some survivors from making effective use of the social, legal, economic, and support resources available to them. This analysis of the sources, contexts, and consequences of these information myths is the first step in devising strategies to counter their ill effects.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:16:44
-
Allen, B.L.: Visualization and cognitve abilities (1998)
0.04
0.03847589 = product of:
0.07695178 = sum of:
0.07695178 = sum of:
0.03456243 = weight(_text_:data in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456243 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238935 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Malsburg, C. von der: Concerning the neuronal code (2018)
0.04
0.03847589 = product of:
0.07695178 = sum of:
0.07695178 = sum of:
0.03456243 = weight(_text_:data in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03456243 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
0.04238935 = weight(_text_:22 in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238935 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The central problem with understanding brain and mind is the neural code issue: understanding the matter of our brain as basis for the phenomena of our mind. The richness with which our mind represents our environment, the parsimony of genetic data, the tremendous efficiency with which the brain learns from scant sensory input and the creativity with which our mind constructs mental worlds all speak in favor of mind as an emergent phenomenon. This raises the further issue of how the neural code supports these processes of organization. The central point of this communication is that the neural code has the form of structured net fragments that are formed by network self-organization, activate and de-activate on the functional time scale, and spontaneously combine to form larger nets with the same basic structure.
- Date
- 27.12.2020 16:56:22
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.03
0.03450819 = product of:
0.06901638 = sum of:
0.06901638 = product of:
0.20704915 = sum of:
0.20704915 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20704915 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44208363 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020)
0.03
0.030422669 = product of:
0.060845338 = sum of:
0.060845338 = sum of:
0.032585774 = weight(_text_:data in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032585774 = score(doc=5655,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.19762816 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.028259566 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259566 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to lay a theoretical foundation for identifying operational information units for library and information professional activities in the context of scholarly communication. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a deduction-verification approach to formulate a typology of units for scholarly information. It first deduces possible units from an existing conceptualization of information, which defines information as the combined product of data and meaning, and then tests the usefulness of these units via two empirical investigations, one with a group of scholarly papers and the other with a sample of scholarly information users. Findings The results show that, on defining an information unit as a piece of information that is complete in both data and meaning, to such an extent that it remains meaningful to its target audience when retrieved and displayed independently in a database, it is then possible to formulate a hierarchical typology of units for scholarly information. The typology proposed in this study consists of three levels, which in turn, consists of 1, 5 and 44 units, respectively. Research limitations/implications The result of this study has theoretical implications on both the philosophical and conceptual levels: on the philosophical level, it hinges on, and reinforces the objective view of information; on the conceptual level, it challenges the conceptualization of work by IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Library Reference Model but endorses that by Library of Congress's BIBFRAME 2.0 model. Practical implications It calls for reconsideration of existing operational units in a variety of library and information activities. Originality/value The study strengthens the conceptual foundation of operational information units and brings to light the primacy of "one work" as an information unit and the possibility for it to be supplemented by smaller units.
- Date
- 14. 1.2020 11:15:22
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.03
0.028259566 = product of:
0.056519132 = sum of:
0.056519132 = product of:
0.113038264 = sum of:
0.113038264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113038264 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
-
San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004)
0.03
0.025650594 = product of:
0.05130119 = sum of:
0.05130119 = sum of:
0.02304162 = weight(_text_:data in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02304162 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
0.028259566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259566 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The new term Representation of knowledge, applied to the framework of electronic segments of information, with comprehension of new material support for information, and a review and total conceptualisation of the terminology which is being applied, entails a review of all traditional documentary practices. Therefore, a definition of the concept of Representation of knowledge is indispensable. The term representation has been used in westere cultural and intellectual tradition to refer to the diverse ways that a subject comprehends an object. Representation is a process which requires the structure of natural language and human memory whereby it is interwoven in a subject and in conscience. However, at the present time, the term Representation of knowledge is applied to the processing of electronic information, combined with the aim of emulating the human mind in such a way that one has endeavoured to transfer, with great difficulty, the complex structurality of the conceptual representation of human knowledge to new digital information technologies. Thus, nowadays, representation of knowledge has taken an diverse meanings and it has focussed, for the moment, an certain structures and conceptual hierarchies which carry and transfer information, and has initially been based an the current representation of knowledge using artificial intelligence. The traditional languages of documentation, also referred to as languages of representation, offer a structured representation of conceptual fields, symbols and terms of natural and notational language, and they are the pillars for the necessary correspondence between the object or text and its representation. These correspondences, connections and symbolisations will be established within the electronic framework by means of different models and of the "goal" domain, which will give rise to organisations, structures, maps, networks and levels, as new electronic documents are not compact units but segments of information. Thus, the new representation of knowledge refers to data, images, figures and symbolised, treated, processed and structured ideas which replace or refer to documents within the framework of technical processing and the recuperation of electronic information.
- Date
- 2. 1.2005 18:22:25
-
Repo, A.J.: ¬The dual approach to the value of information : an appraisal of use and exchange values (1989)
0.02
0.024727121 = product of:
0.049454242 = sum of:
0.049454242 = product of:
0.098908484 = sum of:
0.098908484 = weight(_text_:22 in 5772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098908484 = score(doc=5772,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5772, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5772)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.5, S.373-383
-
Lovhoiden, H.: ¬The myth of information : rediscovering data protocols design as the key to data management (1995)
0.02
0.022541152 = product of:
0.045082305 = sum of:
0.045082305 = product of:
0.09016461 = sum of:
0.09016461 = weight(_text_:data in 4666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09016461 = score(doc=4666,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 4666, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Information researchers are more concerned with exploring myths than advancing the field. Rejects the concept of information, claiming it to be reminiscent of the pipeline metaphor of communication. This claim is based on a constructive world view, sometimes recognised as radical constructivism, sometimes as second order cybernetics, but regarded here as sensible realism. Hence redefines information resources management as data management, since the only thing that can be stored, transferred or received in information systems is data. Their design must be based on this fact. Object orientation must be recognised as a superior approach when developing systems. Common data protocol design is the single most important task for the systems designer and systems performance cannot be improved through computer-human interface design
-
Maguire, P.; Maguire, R.: Consciousness is data compression (2010)
0.02
0.019954631 = product of:
0.039909262 = sum of:
0.039909262 = product of:
0.079818524 = sum of:
0.079818524 = weight(_text_:data in 4972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079818524 = score(doc=4972,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 4972, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4972)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article we advance the conjecture that conscious awareness is equivalent to data compression. Algorithmic information theory supports the assertion that all forms of understanding are contingent on compression (Chaitin, 2007). Here, we argue that the experience people refer to as consciousness is the particular form of understanding that the brain provides. We therefore propose that the degree of consciousness of a system can be measured in terms of the amount of data compression it carries out.
-
Robertson, G.: What is information? (1996)
0.02
0.017662229 = product of:
0.035324458 = sum of:
0.035324458 = product of:
0.070648916 = sum of:
0.070648916 = weight(_text_:22 in 5735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070648916 = score(doc=5735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.22-23
-
Martin, W.J.: ¬The information society (1995)
0.02
0.017662229 = product of:
0.035324458 = sum of:
0.035324458 = product of:
0.070648916 = sum of:
0.070648916 = weight(_text_:22 in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070648916 = score(doc=1201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 7.2002 14:22:55
-
Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000)
0.02
0.017662229 = product of:
0.035324458 = sum of:
0.035324458 = product of:
0.070648916 = sum of:
0.070648916 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070648916 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2001 20:22:57
-
Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022)
0.02
0.017662229 = product of:
0.035324458 = sum of:
0.035324458 = product of:
0.070648916 = sum of:
0.070648916 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070648916 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 8.2022 19:22:57
-
Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006)
0.02
0.017484715 = product of:
0.03496943 = sum of:
0.03496943 = product of:
0.06993886 = sum of:
0.06993886 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06993886 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18260197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:15:22
-
Dervos, D.A.; Coleman, A.: ¬A common sense approach to defining data, information, and metadata (2006)
0.02
0.017460302 = product of:
0.034920603 = sum of:
0.034920603 = product of:
0.069841206 = sum of:
0.069841206 = weight(_text_:data in 227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069841206 = score(doc=227,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16488427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.052144732 = queryNorm
0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 227, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=227)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Many competing definitions for the terms data, information, metadata, and knowledge can be traced in the library and information science literature. The lack of a clear consensus in the way reference is made to the corresponding fundamental concepts is intensified if one considers additional disciplinary perspectives, e.g. database technology, data mining, etc. In the present paper, we use a common sense approach, to selectively survey the literature, and define these terms in a way that can advance the interdisciplinary development of information systems.
