-
Smith, K.F.: POINTER vs. Using Government publications : where's the advantage? (1989)
0.01
0.009564724 = product of:
0.114776686 = sum of:
0.114776686 = weight(_text_:205 in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114776686 = score(doc=1510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.5579419 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1989, no.23, S.191-205
-
Stevens, N.D.: ¬The importance of the verb in the reference question (1988)
0.00
0.001839732 = product of:
0.022076784 = sum of:
0.022076784 = product of:
0.044153567 = sum of:
0.044153567 = weight(_text_:22 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044153567 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.241-244
-
Nawe, J.: How significant is nonverbal communication in the reference interview? : An overview (1989)
0.00
0.001839732 = product of:
0.022076784 = sum of:
0.022076784 = product of:
0.044153567 = sum of:
0.044153567 = weight(_text_:22 in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044153567 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- Maktaba. 11(1989), no.1, S.19-22