Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Detlor, B.; Julien, H.; Willson, R.; Serenko, A.; Lavallee, M.: Learning outcomes of information literacy instruction at business schools (2011) 0.02 
    0.018268304 = product of:
  0.073073216 = sum of:
    0.073073216 = product of:
      0.14614643 = sum of:
        0.14614643 = weight(_text_:instruction in 4356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14614643 = score(doc=4356,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.5563909 = fieldWeight in 4356, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4356)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper reports results from an exploratory study investigating the factors affecting student learning outcomes of information literacy instruction (ILI) given at business schools. Specifically, the potential influence of student demographics, learning environment factors, and information literacy program components on behavioral, psychological, and benefit outcomes were examined. In total, 79 interviews with library administrators, librarians, teaching faculty, and students were conducted at three business schools with varying ILI emphases and characteristics. During these interviews, participants discussed students' ILI experiences and the outcomes arising from those experiences. Data collection also involved application of a standardized information literacy testing instrument that measures student information literacy competency. Analysis yielded the generation of a new holistic theoretical model based on information literacy and educational assessment theories. The model identifies potential salient factors of the learning environment, information literacy program components, and student demographics that may affect ILI student learning outcomes. Recommendations for practice and implications for future research are also made.
  2. Serenko, A.; Detlor, B.; Julien, H.; Booker, L.D.: ¬A model of student learning outcomes of information literacy instruction in a business school (2012) 0.02 
    0.018268304 = product of:
  0.073073216 = sum of:
    0.073073216 = product of:
      0.14614643 = sum of:
        0.14614643 = weight(_text_:instruction in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14614643 = score(doc=62,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.5563909 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This study presents and tests a research model of the outcomes of information literacy instruction (ILI) given to undergraduate business students. This model is based on expectation disconfirmation theory and insights garnered from a recent qualitative investigation of student learning outcomes from ILI given at three business schools. The model was tested through a web survey administered to 372 students. The model represents psychological, behavioral, and benefit outcomes as second-order molecular constructs. Results from a partial least squares (PLS) analysis reveal that expectation disconfirmation influences perceived quality and student satisfaction. These in turn affect student psychological outcomes. Further, psychological outcomes influence student behaviors, which in turn affect benefit outcomes. Based on the study's findings, several recommendations are made.
  3. Booker, L.D.; Detlor, B.; Serenko, A.: Factors affecting the adoption of online library resources by business students (2012) 0.02 
    0.018268304 = product of:
  0.073073216 = sum of:
    0.073073216 = product of:
      0.14614643 = sum of:
        0.14614643 = weight(_text_:instruction in 519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14614643 = score(doc=519,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.5563909 = fieldWeight in 519, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=519)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The overall goal of this study is to explain how information literacy instruction (ILI) influences the adoption of online library resources (OLR) by business students. A theoretical model was developed that integrates research on ILI outcomes and technology adoption. To test this model, a web-based survey, which included both closed and open-ended questions, was administered to 337 business students. Findings indicate that the ILI received by students is beneficial in the initial or early stages of OLR use; however, students quickly reach a saturation point where more instruction contributes little, if anything, to the final outcome, such as reduced OLR anxiety and increased OLR self-efficacy. Rather, it is the independent, continuous use of OLR after receiving initial, formal ILI that creates continued positive effects. Importantly, OLR self-efficacy and anxiety were found to be important antecedents to OLR adoption. OLR anxiety also partially mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and perceived ease of use. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
  4. Smith, C.L.: Domain-independent search expertise : a description of procedural knowledge gained during guided instruction (2015) 0.02 
    0.018268304 = product of:
  0.073073216 = sum of:
    0.073073216 = product of:
      0.14614643 = sum of:
        0.14614643 = weight(_text_:instruction in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14614643 = score(doc=2034,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.5563909 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This longitudinal study examined the search behavior of 10 students as they completed assigned exercises for an online professional course in expert searching. The research objective was to identify, describe, and hypothesize about features of the behavior that are indicative of procedural knowledge gained during guided instruction. Log-data of search interaction were coded using a conceptual framework focused on components of search practice hypothesized to organize an expert searcher's attention during search. The coded data were analyzed using a measure of pointwise mutual information and state-transition analysis. Results of the study provide important insight for future investigation of domain-independent search expertise and for the design of systems that assist searchers in gaining expertise.
  5. Shenton, A.K.; Hay-Gibson, N.V.: Modelling the information-seeking behaviour of children and young people : Inspiration from beyond LIS (2011) 0.01 
    0.010764702 = product of:
  0.04305881 = sum of:
    0.04305881 = product of:
      0.08611762 = sum of:
        0.08611762 = weight(_text_:instruction in 4174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08611762 = score(doc=4174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.32785648 = fieldWeight in 4174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper seeks to draw on Sice's systems model, itself based on Senge's "fixes that fail" archetype, and on data from two previous research projects conducted by one of the authors. The purpose of this paper is to synthesise a new model that portrays the information-seeking behaviour of children and young people. Design/methodology/approach - The systems model provides the backbone of the new framework but additions, accommodations and revisions were made to ensure that the version featured here represents the phenomenon of information seeking by the young as appropriately as possible in terms of the data that were gathered. Findings - One of the new model's most significant characteristics is its emphasis on problems and issues that prevent information seeking from proceeding smoothly. Information seeking is also shown to be an iterative process, with the individual often revisiting previous stages, frequently in response to difficulties. Research limitations/implications - Data were collected from pupils in just seven schools. The undertaking of research further a-field would be invaluable, if the extent to which the model is applicable to other information-seekers in different environments is to be ascertained. Practical implications - The model demonstrates the importance of the information professional's educative role, in terms of both delivering formal information literacy instruction and providing assistance at the point of need. Originality/value - Although the use of ideas and frameworks from other disciplines, with the aim of increasing understanding of phenomena within LIS, is a growing trend, this paper represents one of the first attempts to apply an existing model associated with systems thinking to information behaviour.
  6. Smith, C.L.; Matteson, M.L.: Information literacy in the age of machines that learn : desiderata for machines that teach (2018) 0.00 
    0.004497341 = product of:
  0.017989364 = sum of:
    0.017989364 = product of:
      0.035978727 = sum of:
        0.035978727 = weight(_text_:22 in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035978727 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    16. 3.2019 14:33:22
  7. Lercher, A.: Efficiency of scientific communication : a survey of world science (2010) 0.00 
    0.0037477845 = product of:
  0.014991138 = sum of:
    0.014991138 = product of:
      0.029982276 = sum of:
        0.029982276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029982276 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to measure the efficiency of the system by which scientists worldwide communicate results to each other, providing one measure of the degree to which the system, including all media, functions well. A randomly selected and representative sample of 246 active research scientists worldwide was surveyed. The main measure was the reported rate of "late finds": scientific literature that would have been useful to scientists' projects if it had been found at the beginning of these projects. The main result was that 46% of the sample reported late finds (±6.25%, p0.05). Among respondents from European Union countries or other countries classified as "high income" by the World Bank, 42% reported late finds. Among respondents from low- and middle-income countries, 56% reported late finds. The 42% rate in high-income countries in 2009 can be compared with results of earlier surveys by Martyn (1964a, b, 1987). These earlier surveys found a rate of 22% late finds in 1963-1964 and a rate of 27% in 1985-1986. Respondents were also queried about search habits, but this study failed to support any explanations for this increase in the rate of late finds. This study also permits a crude estimate of the cost in time and money of the increase in late finds.
  8. Cole, C.; Behesthi, J.; Large, A.; Lamoureux, I.; Abuhimed, D.; AlGhamdi, M.: Seeking information for a middle school history project : the concept of implicit knowledge in the students' transition from Kuhlthau's Stage 3 to Stage 4 (2013) 0.00 
    0.0037477845 = product of:
  0.014991138 = sum of:
    0.014991138 = product of:
      0.029982276 = sum of:
        0.029982276 = weight(_text_:22 in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029982276 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:41:17
  9. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016) 0.00 
    0.0037477845 = product of:
  0.014991138 = sum of:
    0.014991138 = product of:
      0.029982276 = sum of:
        0.029982276 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029982276 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:58:25
  10. Chew, S.W.; Khoo, K.S.G.: Comparison of drug information on consumer drug review sites versus authoritative health information websites (2016) 0.00 
    0.0037477845 = product of:
  0.014991138 = sum of:
    0.014991138 = product of:
      0.029982276 = sum of:
        0.029982276 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029982276 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:24:05
  11. Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017) 0.00 
    0.0037477845 = product of:
  0.014991138 = sum of:
    0.014991138 = product of:
      0.029982276 = sum of:
        0.029982276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029982276 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35
  12. Jaskolla, L.; Rugel, M.: Smart questions : steps towards an ontology of questions and answers (2014) 0.00 
    0.0037477845 = product of:
  0.014991138 = sum of:
    0.014991138 = product of:
      0.029982276 = sum of:
        0.029982276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029982276 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9. 2.2017 19:22:59
  13. Pinto, M.: Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies (2016) 0.00 
    0.0029982275 = product of:
  0.01199291 = sum of:
    0.01199291 = product of:
      0.02398582 = sum of:
        0.02398582 = weight(_text_:22 in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02398582 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04425879 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors

Themes