Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Chylkowska, E.: Implementation of information exchange : online dictionaries (2005) 0.04
    0.04214637 = product of:
      0.08429274 = sum of:
        0.08429274 = sum of:
          0.049313232 = weight(_text_:56 in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049313232 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051635534 = queryNorm
              0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
          0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03497951 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051635534 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:05:56
  2. Fallis, D.: Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia (2008) 0.03
    0.033717096 = product of:
      0.06743419 = sum of:
        0.06743419 = sum of:
          0.039450586 = weight(_text_:56 in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039450586 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051635534 = queryNorm
              0.18375319 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
          0.027983608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027983608 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051635534 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Wikipedia (the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit) is having a huge impact on how a great many people gather information about the world. So, it is important for epistemologists and information scientists to ask whether people are likely to acquire knowledge as a result of having access to this information source. In other words, is Wikipedia having good epistemic consequences? After surveying the various concerns that have been raised about the reliability of Wikipedia, this article argues that the epistemic consequences of people using Wikipedia as a source of information are likely to be quite good. According to several empirical studies, the reliability of Wikipedia compares favorably to the reliability of traditional encyclopedias. Furthermore, the reliability of Wikipedia compares even more favorably to the reliability of those information sources that people would be likely to use if Wikipedia did not exist (viz., Web sites that are as freely and easily accessible as Wikipedia). In addition, Wikipedia has a number of other epistemic virtues (e.g., power, speed, and fecundity) that arguably outweigh any deficiency in terms of reliability. Even so, epistemologists and information scientists should certainly be trying to identify changes (or alternatives) to Wikipedia that will bring about even better epistemic consequences. This article suggests that to improve Wikipedia, we need to clarify what our epistemic values are and to better understand why Wikipedia works as well as it does. Somebody who reads Wikipedia is rather in the position of a visitor to a public restroom, says Mr. McHenry, Britannica's former editor. It may be obviously dirty, so that he knows to exercise great care, or it may seem fairly clean, so that he may be lulled into a false sense of security. What he certainly does not know is who has used the facilities before him. One wonders whether people like Mr. McHenry would prefer there to be no public lavatories at all. The Economist (Vol. 379, April 22, 2006, pp. 14-15)
    Date
    27. 7.2008 19:04:56
  3. Vizine-Goetz, D.: Spectrum: A Web-Tool for Describing Internet Resources (2001) 0.03
    0.02958794 = product of:
      0.05917588 = sum of:
        0.05917588 = product of:
          0.11835176 = sum of:
            0.11835176 = weight(_text_:56 in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11835176 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.5512596 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of library administration. 34(2001) nos.1/2, S.49-56
  4. Bazler, J.A.: Biology resources in the electronic age (2003) 0.03
    0.02958794 = product of:
      0.05917588 = sum of:
        0.05917588 = product of:
          0.11835176 = sum of:
            0.11835176 = weight(_text_:56 in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11835176 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.5512596 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 17:56:39
  5. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02
    0.024734247 = product of:
      0.049468495 = sum of:
        0.049468495 = product of:
          0.09893699 = sum of:
            0.09893699 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09893699 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  6. Holt, C.: Guide to information sources in the forensic sciences : a guide to the literature (2005) 0.02
    0.024656616 = product of:
      0.049313232 = sum of:
        0.049313232 = product of:
          0.098626465 = sum of:
            0.098626465 = weight(_text_:56 in 4571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098626465 = score(doc=4571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.45938298 = fieldWeight in 4571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4571)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:06:56
  7. Subject gateways (2000) 0.02
    0.024485657 = product of:
      0.048971314 = sum of:
        0.048971314 = product of:
          0.09794263 = sum of:
            0.09794263 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09794263 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01
  8. Lipow, A.G.: ¬The virtual reference librarian's handbook (2003) 0.02
    0.021073185 = product of:
      0.04214637 = sum of:
        0.04214637 = sum of:
          0.024656616 = weight(_text_:56 in 3992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024656616 = score(doc=3992,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051635534 = queryNorm
              0.114845745 = fieldWeight in 3992, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3992)
          0.017489756 = weight(_text_:22 in 3992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017489756 = score(doc=3992,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051635534 = queryNorm
              0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 3992, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2004 14:46:50
    Footnote
    Rez. in BuB 56(2004) H.3: "Auskunfts- und Informationsdienst wird in den USA als unverzichtbare und wohl wichtigste bibliothekarische Tätigkeit betrachtet. Daher verwundert nicht, dass die Popularisierung des Internet Bibliothekare und Bibliotheken frühzeitig dazu veranlasst hat, ihre Auskunftsdienstleistungen im Web anzubieten. Dies geschah zunächst durch organisierte Auskunft per E-Mail, später per Webformular und vor allem seit 2000/2001 verstärkt per Chat. Als zusammenfassende Bezeichnung für diese Varianten wird meist der Begriff digital reference verwendet. In den USA, aber auch in Australien, Großbritannien oder Skandinavien schenkt man dem Thema Digital Reference schon seit mehreren Jahren größte Aufmerksamkeit. Die Zahl der bislang dazu publizierten Fachaufsätze lag Ende 2003 bereits weit über 600, jährlich im November findet seit 1999 die »Digital Reference Conference« statt, und mit DIG_REF sowie LiveReference existieren zwei Diskussionslisten, die sich ausschließlich mit Fragen bibliothekarischer Auskunft im Internet beschäftigen. Im vergangenen Jahr sind in den USA allein vier umfangreiche Monographien zu Digital Reference erschienen, darunter das hier zu besprechende Werk von Anne Lipow. ... Gegenwärtig deutet sich an, dass das Thema Digital Reference, Online-Auskunft oder Auskunft per Chat in deutschen Bibliotheken auf mehr Interesse stößt als in den vergangenen Jahren. Nachdem bislang vorwiegend (einige wenige) wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken ChatAuskunft anbieten, haben mehrere Öffentliche Bibliotheken, darunter die ZLB Berlin und die Stadtbücherei Frankfurt am Main, angekündigt, zukünftig auchAuskunftperChatanbieten zu wollen. Eine wichtige Rolle spielt in diesem Zusammenhang der weltweite Auskunftsverbund QuestionPoint, der von OCLC gemeinsam mit der Library of Congress betrieben wird. Sowohl denjenigen, die sich noch im Unklaren sind, als auch jenen, die entsprechende Planungen bereits beschlossen haben, kann der Band von Anne Lipow nur wärmstens empfohlen werden." (H. Rösch)
  9. Metadata and organizing educational resources on the Internet (2000) 0.02
    0.019725293 = product of:
      0.039450586 = sum of:
        0.039450586 = product of:
          0.07890117 = sum of:
            0.07890117 = weight(_text_:56 in 1473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07890117 = score(doc=1473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.36750638 = fieldWeight in 1473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1473)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 3.2003 12:13:56
  10. Fels, G.: Elektronische Medien in der Chemie Chemieinformation gestern, heute, morgen (2007) 0.02
    0.019725293 = product of:
      0.039450586 = sum of:
        0.039450586 = product of:
          0.07890117 = sum of:
            0.07890117 = weight(_text_:56 in 777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07890117 = score(doc=777,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.36750638 = fieldWeight in 777, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=777)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.1, S.51-56
  11. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.02
    0.017489756 = product of:
      0.03497951 = sum of:
        0.03497951 = product of:
          0.06995902 = sum of:
            0.06995902 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06995902 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  12. Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000) 0.01
    0.013991804 = product of:
      0.027983608 = sum of:
        0.027983608 = product of:
          0.055967215 = sum of:
            0.055967215 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055967215 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:16
  13. Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000) 0.01
    0.013991804 = product of:
      0.027983608 = sum of:
        0.027983608 = product of:
          0.055967215 = sum of:
            0.055967215 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055967215 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:36:13
  14. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D; Gunter, B.; Russell, C.; Withey, R.; Polydoratou, P.: Consumer trust in health information on the web (2004) 0.01
    0.012328308 = product of:
      0.024656616 = sum of:
        0.024656616 = product of:
          0.049313232 = sum of:
            0.049313232 = weight(_text_:56 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049313232 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 56(2004) no.6, S.373-382
  15. Price, A.: NOVAGate : a Nordic gateway to electronic resources in the forestry, veterinary and agricultural sciences (2000) 0.01
    0.0122428285 = product of:
      0.024485657 = sum of:
        0.024485657 = product of:
          0.048971314 = sum of:
            0.048971314 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048971314 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:00
  16. Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000) 0.01
    0.0122428285 = product of:
      0.024485657 = sum of:
        0.024485657 = product of:
          0.048971314 = sum of:
            0.048971314 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048971314 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:37:55
  17. Fischer, T.; Neuroth, H.: SSG-FI - special subject gateways to high quality Internet resources for scientific users (2000) 0.01
    0.010493852 = product of:
      0.020987704 = sum of:
        0.020987704 = product of:
          0.04197541 = sum of:
            0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04197541 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:42
  18. Bargheer, M.: Quality control and evaluation of scientific Web resources (2003) 0.01
    0.010493852 = product of:
      0.020987704 = sum of:
        0.020987704 = product of:
          0.04197541 = sum of:
            0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 1767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04197541 = score(doc=1767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:43:38
  19. Geisselmann, F.: Access methods in a database of e-journals (2003) 0.01
    0.009862646 = product of:
      0.019725293 = sum of:
        0.019725293 = product of:
          0.039450586 = sum of:
            0.039450586 = weight(_text_:56 in 3819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039450586 = score(doc=3819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.18375319 = fieldWeight in 3819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 8.2005 21:56:38
  20. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.008744878 = product of:
      0.017489756 = sum of:
        0.017489756 = product of:
          0.03497951 = sum of:
            0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03497951 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.