-
Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016)
0.15
0.1489765 = product of:
0.22346476 = sum of:
0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029600013 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.19386475 = sum of:
0.15791368 = weight(_text_:van in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15791368 = score(doc=2647,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.64030313 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035951063 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- "Genius work," proposed by Avramescu, refers to scientific articles whose citations grow exponentially in an extended period, for example, over 50 years. Such articles were defined as "sleeping beauties" by van Raan, who quantitatively studied the phenomenon of delayed recognition. However, the criteria adopted by van Raan at times are not applicable and may confer recognition prematurely. To revise such deficiencies, this paper proposes two new criteria, which are applicable (but not limited) to exponential citation curves. We searched for genius work among articles of Nobel Prize laureates during the period of 1901-2012 on the Web of Science, finding 25 articles of genius work out of 21,438 papers including 10 (by van Raan's criteria) sleeping beauties and 15 nonsleeping-beauties. By our new criteria, two findings were obtained through empirical analysis: (a) the awakening periods for genius work depend on the increase rate b in the exponential function, and (b) lower b leads to a longer sleeping period.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:13:32
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.08
0.084578745 = product of:
0.12686811 = sum of:
0.078933366 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078933366 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.047934752 = product of:
0.095869504 = sum of:
0.095869504 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095869504 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.08
0.084578745 = product of:
0.12686811 = sum of:
0.078933366 = weight(_text_:j in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078933366 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.047934752 = product of:
0.095869504 = sum of:
0.095869504 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095869504 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.08
0.07889666 = product of:
0.23668995 = sum of:
0.23668995 = sum of:
0.15195249 = weight(_text_:van in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15195249 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.6161319 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.084737465 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084737465 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Eijk, C.C. van der; Mulligen, E.M. van; Kors, J.A.; Mons, B.; Berg, J. van den: Constructing an associative concept space for literature-based discovery (2004)
0.07
0.07237124 = product of:
0.10855685 = sum of:
0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029600013 = score(doc=2228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.07895684 = product of:
0.15791368 = sum of:
0.15791368 = weight(_text_:van in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15791368 = score(doc=2228,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.64030313 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Eck, N.J. van; Waltman, L.; Dekker, R.; Berg, J. van den: ¬A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping : multidimensional scaling and VOS (2010)
0.06
0.062712006 = product of:
0.094068006 = sum of:
0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 4112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029600013 = score(doc=4112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4112)
0.06446799 = product of:
0.12893598 = sum of:
0.12893598 = weight(_text_:van in 4112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12893598 = score(doc=4112,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.5228053 = fieldWeight in 4112, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4112)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Waltman, L.; Calero-Medina, C.; Kosten, J.; Noyons, E.C.M.; Tijssen, R.J.W.; Eck, N.J. van; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van; Visser, M.S.; Wouters, P.: ¬The Leiden ranking 2011/2012 : data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)
0.06
0.06030936 = product of:
0.09046404 = sum of:
0.024666676 = weight(_text_:j in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024666676 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
0.065797366 = product of:
0.13159473 = sum of:
0.13159473 = weight(_text_:van in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13159473 = score(doc=514,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.5335859 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998)
0.06
0.056498915 = product of:
0.16949674 = sum of:
0.16949674 = sum of:
0.121562 = weight(_text_:van in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.121562 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.49290553 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.047934752 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047934752 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:26:54
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.05
0.05496235 = product of:
0.16488704 = sum of:
0.16488704 = sum of:
0.12893598 = weight(_text_:van in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12893598 = score(doc=2758,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.5228053 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035951063 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
-
Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009)
0.05
0.053851318 = product of:
0.16155395 = sum of:
0.16155395 = sum of:
0.13159473 = weight(_text_:van in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13159473 = score(doc=2759,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.5335859 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.02995922 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02995922 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:02:48
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system: influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.565-576.
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.05
0.047337994 = product of:
0.14201398 = sum of:
0.14201398 = sum of:
0.0911715 = weight(_text_:van in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0911715 = score(doc=5275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.36967915 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.050842483 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050842483 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Johan Bollen, J.; Van de Sompel, H.: Usage impact factor : the effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics (2008)
0.04
0.04176987 = product of:
0.0626548 = sum of:
0.024666676 = weight(_text_:j in 1346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024666676 = score(doc=1346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1346)
0.037988123 = product of:
0.075976245 = sum of:
0.075976245 = weight(_text_:van in 1346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075976245 = score(doc=1346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.30806595 = fieldWeight in 1346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Wiggers, G.; Verberne, S.; Loon, W. van; Zwenne, G.-J.: Bibliometric-enhanced legal information retrieval : combining usage and citations as flavors of impact relevance (2023)
0.04
0.04176987 = product of:
0.0626548 = sum of:
0.024666676 = weight(_text_:j in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024666676 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
0.037988123 = product of:
0.075976245 = sum of:
0.075976245 = weight(_text_:van in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075976245 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.30806595 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The ripple effect : citation chain reactions of a nobel prize (2013)
0.04
0.039890848 = product of:
0.059836272 = sum of:
0.04186074 = weight(_text_:j in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04186074 = score(doc=654,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
0.017975532 = product of:
0.035951063 = sum of:
0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035951063 = score(doc=654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the possible citation chain reactions of a Nobel Prize using the mathematician Robert J. Aumann as a case example. The results show that the award of the Nobel Prize in 2005 affected not only the citations to his work, but also affected the citations to the references in his scientific oeuvre. The results indicate that the spillover effect is almost as powerful as the effect itself. We are consequently able to document a ripple effect in which the awarding of the Nobel Prize ignites a citation chain reaction to Aumann's scientific oeuvre and to the references in its nearest citation network. The effect is discussed using innovation decision process theory as a point of departure to identify the factors that created a bandwagon effect leading to the reported observations.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 16:21:09
-
Moed, H.F.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Reedijk, J.: ¬A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors (1998)
0.03
0.033415895 = product of:
0.05012384 = sum of:
0.019733341 = weight(_text_:j in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019733341 = score(doc=4719,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
0.0303905 = product of:
0.060781 = sum of:
0.060781 = weight(_text_:van in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060781 = score(doc=4719,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.24645276 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Kreider, J.: ¬The correlation of local citation data with citation data from Journal Citation Reports (1999)
0.03
0.031717032 = product of:
0.047575545 = sum of:
0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029600013 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.017975532 = product of:
0.035951063 = sum of:
0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035951063 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.03
0.031717032 = product of:
0.047575545 = sum of:
0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029600013 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.017975532 = product of:
0.035951063 = sum of:
0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035951063 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011)
0.03
0.031717032 = product of:
0.047575545 = sum of:
0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029600013 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.017975532 = product of:
0.035951063 = sum of:
0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035951063 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
-
Hicks, D.; Wang, J.: Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists (2011)
0.03
0.031717032 = product of:
0.047575545 = sum of:
0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029600013 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
0.017975532 = product of:
0.035951063 = sum of:
0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035951063 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:21:28
-
Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014)
0.03
0.030567363 = product of:
0.045851044 = sum of:
0.024666676 = weight(_text_:j in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024666676 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.021184366 = product of:
0.042368732 = sum of:
0.042368732 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042368732 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044224758 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
