Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.04 
    0.0410558 = product of:
  0.0821116 = sum of:
    0.0821116 = sum of:
      0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007219314 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.07489228 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07489228 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.3, S.45-48
  2. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.03 
    0.027370533 = product of:
  0.054741066 = sum of:
    0.054741066 = sum of:
      0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004812876 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04992819 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
    Source
    The Gilbane report. 11(2003) no. 2, March. S.2-13
  3. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.03 
    0.027370533 = product of:
  0.054741066 = sum of:
    0.054741066 = sum of:
      0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004812876 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04992819 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
  4. Alex, H.; Heiner-Freiling, M.: Melvil (2005) 0.02 
    0.023949215 = product of:
  0.04789843 = sum of:
    0.04789843 = sum of:
      0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0042112665 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
      0.043687165 = weight(_text_:22 in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043687165 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ab Januar 2006 wird Die Deutsche Bibliothek ein neues Webangebot mit dem Namen Melvil starten, das ein Ergebnis ihres Engagements für die DDC und das Projekt DDC Deutsch ist. Der angebotene Webservice basiert auf der Übersetzung der 22. Ausgabe der DDC, die im Oktober 2005 als Druckausgabe im K. G. Saur Verlag erscheint. Er bietet jedoch darüber hinausgehende Features, die den Klassifizierer bei seiner Arbeit unterstützen und erstmals eine verbale Recherche für Endnutzer über DDCerschlossene Titel ermöglichen. Der Webservice Melvil gliedert sich in drei Anwendungen: - MelvilClass, - MelvilSearch und - MelvilSoap.
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 17(2005) H.3, S.14-17
  5. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.02 
    0.023949215 = product of:
  0.04789843 = sum of:
    0.04789843 = sum of:
      0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0042112665 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.043687165 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043687165 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.2, S.129-137
  6. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.02 
    0.0205279 = product of:
  0.0410558 = sum of:
    0.0410558 = sum of:
      0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.003609657 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
      0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03744614 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.3, S.157-165
  7. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.02 
    0.0205279 = product of:
  0.0410558 = sum of:
    0.0410558 = sum of:
      0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.003609657 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03744614 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046063907 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
    Source
    El profesional de la información, 2007, noviembre-diciembre, v.16, no.6, S.580-589
  8. Dumais, S.; Chen, H.: Hierarchical classification of Web content (2000) 0.00 
    0.0025524131 = product of:
  0.0051048263 = sum of:
    0.0051048263 = product of:
      0.010209653 = sum of:
        0.010209653 = weight(_text_:s in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010209653 = score(doc=492,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.256-263
  9. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.00 
    0.0021056333 = product of:
  0.0042112665 = sum of:
    0.0042112665 = product of:
      0.008422533 = sum of:
        0.008422533 = weight(_text_:s in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008422533 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 35(2001), S.249-298
  10. Lin, Z.Y.: Classification practice and implications for subject directories of the Chinese language Web-based digital library (2000) 0.00 
    0.0018048285 = product of:
  0.003609657 = sum of:
    0.003609657 = product of:
      0.007219314 = sum of:
        0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007219314 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 3(2000) no.4, S.29-50
  11. Hickey, T.B.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: ¬The Role of Classification in CORC (2001) 0.00 
    0.0015040238 = product of:
  0.0030080476 = sum of:
    0.0030080476 = product of:
      0.006016095 = sum of:
        0.006016095 = weight(_text_:s in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006016095 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of library administration. 34(2001) nos.3/4, S.421-430
  12. Wheatley, A.: Subject trees on the Internet : a new role for bibliographic classification? (2000) 0.00 
    0.001203219 = product of:
  0.002406438 = sum of:
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 6108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004812876 = score(doc=6108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(2000) nos.3/4, S.115-141
  13. Saeed, H.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Using Dewey decimal classification scheme (DDC) for building taxonomies for knowledge organisation (2002) 0.00 
    0.001203219 = product of:
  0.002406438 = sum of:
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 4461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004812876 = score(doc=4461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4461)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.5, S.575-583
  14. Dunsire, G.: Digital decimals : Dewey and online libraries (2008) 0.00 
    0.001203219 = product of:
  0.002406438 = sum of:
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004812876 = score(doc=2164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.105-114
  15. Zaytseva, E.: Classification tools for librarians and users : the Russian experience (2008) 0.00 
    0.001203219 = product of:
  0.002406438 = sum of:
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 2179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004812876 = score(doc=2179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2179)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.101-103
  16. Sparck Jones, K.: Some thoughts on classification for retrieval (2005) 0.00 
    0.0010635054 = product of:
  0.0021270108 = sum of:
    0.0021270108 = product of:
      0.0042540217 = sum of:
        0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042540217 = score(doc=4392,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper was originally published in 1970 (Journal of documentation. 26(1970), S.89-101), considered the suggestion that classifications for retrieval should be constructed automatically and raised some serious problems concerning the sorts of classification which were required, and the way in which formal classification theories should be exploited, given that a retrieval classification is required for a purpose. These difficulties had not been sufficiently considered, and the paper, therefore, aims to attempt an analysis of them, though no solutions of immediate application could be suggested. Design/methodology/approach - Starting with the illustrative proposition that a polythetic, multiple, unordered classification is required in automatic thesaurus construction, this is considered in the context of classification in general, where eight sorts of classification can be distinguished, each covering a range of class definitions and class-finding algorithms. Findings - Since there is generally no natural or best classification of a set of objects as such, the evaluation of alternative classifications requires either formal criteria of goodness of fit, or, if a classification is required for a purpose, a precise statement of that purpose. In any case a substantive theory of classification is needed, which does not exist; and, since sufficiently precise specifications of retrieval requirements are also lacking, the only currently available approach to automatic classification experiments for information retrieval is to do enough of them. Originality/value - Gives insights into the classification of material for information retrieval.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.5, S.571-581
  17. Hjoerland, B.; Pedersen, K.N.: ¬A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval (2005) 0.00 
    0.0010635054 = product of:
  0.0021270108 = sum of:
    0.0021270108 = product of:
      0.0042540217 = sum of:
        0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042540217 = score(doc=1892,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - To suggest that a theory of classification for information retrieval (IR), asked for by Spärck Jones in a 1970 paper, presupposes a full implementation of a pragmatic understanding. Part of the Journal of Documentation celebration, "60 years of the best in information research". Design/methodology/approach - Literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Sparck Jones as its starting-point. Analysis involves distinctions between "positivism" and "pragmatism" and "classical" versus Kuhnian understandings of concepts. Findings - Classification, both manual and automatic, for retrieval benefits from drawing upon a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques, a consideration of theories of meaning, and the adding of top-down approaches to IR in which divisions of labour, domains, traditions, genres, document architectures etc. are included as analytical elements and in which specific IR algorithms are based on the examination of specific literatures. Introduces an example illustrating the consequences of a full implementation of a pragmatist understanding when handling homonyms. Practical implications - Outlines how to classify from a pragmatic-philosophical point of view. Originality/value - Provides, emphasizing a pragmatic understanding, insights of importance to classification for retrieval, both manual and automatic. - Vgl. auch: Szostak, R.: Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science. In: Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.319-332.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.5, S.582-597
  18. Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: ¬A faceted approach to subject data in the Dublin Core metadata record (2001) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 4(2001) nos.1/2, S.35-47
  19. Adcock, L.: Building a virtual music library : towards a convergence of classification within Internet-based catalogues (2001) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 6955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=6955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6955)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 28(2001) no.2, S.66-74
  20. LaBarre, K.: Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? (2004) 0.00 
    0.0010528166 = product of:
  0.0021056333 = sum of:
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042112665 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.79-84

Authors

Themes