-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.01
0.01092404 = product of:
0.03823414 = sum of:
0.00878854 = product of:
0.0439427 = sum of:
0.0439427 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0439427 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0294456 = product of:
0.0588912 = sum of:
0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0588912 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006)
0.01
0.010567299 = product of:
0.036985546 = sum of:
0.022262746 = product of:
0.055656865 = sum of:
0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02197135 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
0.033685513 = weight(_text_:system in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033685513 = score(doc=769,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification (HILCC) is a system developed by the Columbia University Library to leverage call number data from the MARC holdings records in Columbia's online catalog to create a structured, hierarchical menuing system that provides subject access to the library's electronic resources. In this paper, the authors describe a research initiative at the Cornell University Library to discover if the Columbia HILCC scheme can be used as developed or in modified form to create a virtual undergraduate print collection outside the context of the traditional online catalog. Their results indicate that, with certain adjustments, an HILCC model can indeed, be used to represent the holdings of a large research library's undergraduate collection of approximately 150,000 titles, but that such a model is not infinitely scalable and may require a new approach to browsing such a large information space.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.01
0.007976091 = product of:
0.027916316 = sum of:
0.008285915 = product of:
0.04142957 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=4869,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0196304 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392608 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.01
0.007282694 = product of:
0.025489427 = sum of:
0.0058590267 = product of:
0.029295133 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0196304 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392608 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.01
0.007282694 = product of:
0.025489427 = sum of:
0.0058590267 = product of:
0.029295133 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0196304 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392608 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Alex, H.; Heiner-Freiling, M.: Melvil (2005)
0.01
0.0063723573 = product of:
0.02230325 = sum of:
0.0051266486 = product of:
0.025633242 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Ab Januar 2006 wird Die Deutsche Bibliothek ein neues Webangebot mit dem Namen Melvil starten, das ein Ergebnis ihres Engagements für die DDC und das Projekt DDC Deutsch ist. Der angebotene Webservice basiert auf der Übersetzung der 22. Ausgabe der DDC, die im Oktober 2005 als Druckausgabe im K. G. Saur Verlag erscheint. Er bietet jedoch darüber hinausgehende Features, die den Klassifizierer bei seiner Arbeit unterstützen und erstmals eine verbale Recherche für Endnutzer über DDCerschlossene Titel ermöglichen. Der Webservice Melvil gliedert sich in drei Anwendungen: - MelvilClass, - MelvilSearch und - MelvilSoap.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006)
0.01
0.0063723573 = product of:
0.02230325 = sum of:
0.0051266486 = product of:
0.025633242 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.01
0.00546202 = product of:
0.01911707 = sum of:
0.00439427 = product of:
0.02197135 = sum of:
0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02197135 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing application for organizing and accessing internet resources (2003)
0.00
0.0044592395 = product of:
0.031214675 = sum of:
0.031214675 = product of:
0.07803669 = sum of:
0.02537033 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02537033 = score(doc=3966,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23154683 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.05266636 = weight(_text_:system in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05266636 = score(doc=3966,freq=22.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46164727 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the WWW. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing System of Ranganathan. A prototype software system has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and URL of the Web document, the record is stored in the system. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The system stores the surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. Search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using chain indexing technique. If a single term is input, the system searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved headings is too large (running into more than a page) then the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The system searches subject headings already retrieved and look for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed under Windows NT environment using ASP and web server is under rigorous testing. The database and indexes management routines need further development.
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001)
0.00
0.0044006743 = product of:
0.01540236 = sum of:
0.010494759 = product of:
0.026236897 = sum of:
0.010357393 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010357393 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.09452859 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.015879504 = weight(_text_:system in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015879504 = score(doc=2047,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.0049076 = product of:
0.0098152 = sum of:
0.0098152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0098152 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 2. 1.2004 10:35:22
- Footnote
- AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002)
0.00
0.004211641 = product of:
0.029481484 = sum of:
0.029481484 = product of:
0.073703706 = sum of:
0.018125437 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018125437 = score(doc=97,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055578265 = score(doc=97,freq=32.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the World Wide Web. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing system of Ranganathan. A prototype Software System has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and to input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the Standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and the URL of the web document, the record is stored in the System. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The System stores the Surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. The search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using the chain indexing technique. If a single term is Input, the System searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved Keadings is too large (running into more than a page) the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The System searches subject headings already retrieved and looks for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL, the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed in a Windows NT environment using ASP and a web server is under rigorous testing. The database and Index management routines need further development.
An interesting but somewhat confusing article telling how the writers described web pages with Dublin Core metadata, including a faceted classification, and built a system that lets users browse the collection through the facets. They seem to want to cover too much in a short article, and unnecessary space is given over to screen shots showing how Dublin Core metadata was entered. The screen shots of the resulting browsable system are, unfortunately, not as enlightening as one would hope, and there is no discussion of how the system was actually written or the technology behind it. Still, it could be worth reading as an example of such a system and how it is treated in journals.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Facets and controlled vocabularies : an annotated bibliography (2003)
0.00
0.0041822046 = product of:
0.029275432 = sum of:
0.029275432 = product of:
0.07318858 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=2900,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: All about facets and controlled vocabularies (2002)
0.00
0.0041822046 = product of:
0.029275432 = sum of:
0.029275432 = product of:
0.07318858 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=5141,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: What is a controlled vocabulary? (2002)
0.00
0.0041822046 = product of:
0.029275432 = sum of:
0.029275432 = product of:
0.07318858 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=2417,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Creating a controlled vocabulary (2003)
0.00
0.0041822046 = product of:
0.029275432 = sum of:
0.029275432 = product of:
0.07318858 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=2461,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Synonym rings and authority files (2003)
0.00
0.0041822046 = product of:
0.029275432 = sum of:
0.029275432 = product of:
0.07318858 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=2468,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2468, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2468)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 2468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=2468,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2468, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2468)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Controlled vocabularies : a glosso-thesaurus (2003)
0.00
0.0041822046 = product of:
0.029275432 = sum of:
0.029275432 = product of:
0.07318858 = sum of:
0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142957 = score(doc=2469,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2469, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2469)
0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 2469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03175901 = score(doc=2469,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2469, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2469)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.: DeweyBrowser (2006)
0.00
0.003710458 = product of:
0.025973205 = sum of:
0.025973205 = product of:
0.06493301 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=5774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
0.039299767 = weight(_text_:system in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039299767 = score(doc=5774,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The DeweyBrowser allows users to search and browse collections of library resources organized by the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system. The visual interface provides access to several million records from the OCLC WorldCat database and to a collection of records derived from the abridged edition of DDC. The prototype was developed out of a desire to make the most of Dewey numbers assigned to library materials and to explore new ways of providing access to the DDC.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System"
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003)
0.00
0.003696582 = product of:
0.025876073 = sum of:
0.025876073 = product of:
0.06469018 = sum of:
0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03661892 = score(doc=2703,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.028071264 = weight(_text_:system in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028071264 = score(doc=2703,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses two inter-related themes: the retrieval potential of faceted thesauri and XML representations of fundamental facets. Initial findings are discussed from the ongoing 'FACET' project, in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry. The work discussed seeks to take advantage of the structure afforded by faceted systems for multi-term queries and flexible matching, focusing in this paper an the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A multi-term matching function yields ranked results with partial matches via semantic term expansion, based an a measure of distance over the semantic index space formed by thesaurus relationships. Our intention is to drive the system from general representations and a common query structure and interface. To this end, we are developing an XML representation based an work by the Classification Research Group an fundamental facets or categories. The XML representation maps categories to particular thesauri and hierarchies. The system interface, which is configured by the mapping, incorporates a thesaurus browser with navigation history together with a term search facility and drag and drop query builder.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages (2006)
0.00
0.0036594293 = product of:
0.025616003 = sum of:
0.025616003 = product of:
0.064040005 = sum of:
0.036250874 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036250874 = score(doc=232,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027789133 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This paper examines some traditional information searching methods and their role in Hungarian OPACs. What challenges are there in the digital and online environment? How do users work with them and do they give users satisfactory results? What kinds of techniques are users employing? In this paper I examine the user interfaces of UDC, thesauri, subject headings etc. in the Hungarian library. The key question of the paper is whether a universal system or local solutions is the best approach for searching in the digital environment.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
