Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.02 
    0.016114645 = product of:
  0.03222929 = sum of:
    0.03222929 = sum of:
      0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0073292386 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045945734 = queryNorm
          0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.024900049 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024900049 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045945734 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 6(2000) no.10, xx S
  2. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.01 
    0.007781266 = product of:
  0.015562532 = sum of:
    0.015562532 = product of:
      0.031125063 = sum of:
        0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031125063 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  3. Weibel, S.L.: Border crossings : reflections on a decade of metadata consensus building (2005) 0.01 
    0.0051214616 = product of:
  0.010242923 = sum of:
    0.010242923 = product of:
      0.020485846 = sum of:
        0.020485846 = weight(_text_:d in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020485846 = score(doc=1187,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.23468448 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In June of this year, I performed my final official duties as part of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative management team. It is a happy irony to affix a seal on that service in this journal, as both D-Lib Magazine and the Dublin Core celebrate their tenth anniversaries. This essay is a personal reflection on some of the achievements and lessons of that decade. The OCLC-NCSA Metadata Workshop took place in March of 1995, and as we tried to understand what it meant and who would care, D-Lib magazine came into being and offered a natural venue for sharing our work. I recall a certain skepticism when Bill Arms said "We want D-Lib to be the first place people look for the latest developments in digital library research." These were the early days in the evolution of electronic publishing, and the goal was ambitious. By any measure, a decade of high-quality electronic publishing is an auspicious accomplishment, and D-Lib (and its host, CNRI) deserve congratulations for having achieved their goal. I am grateful to have been a contributor. That first DC workshop led to further workshops, a community, a variety of standards in several countries, an ISO standard, a conference series, and an international consortium. Looking back on this evolution is both satisfying and wistful. While I am pleased that the achievements are substantial, the unmet challenges also provide a rich till in which to cultivate insights on the development of digital infrastructure.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 11(2005) nos.7/8, x S
  4. Wen, D.; Sakaguchi, T.; Sugimoto, S.; Tabata, K.: Multilingual Access to Dublin Core Metadata of ULIS Library (2002) 0.00 
    0.004580774 = product of:
  0.009161548 = sum of:
    0.009161548 = product of:
      0.018323096 = sum of:
        0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323096 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. McClelland, M.; McArthur, D.; Giersch, S.; Geisler, G.: Challenges for service providers when importing metadata in digital libraries (2002) 0.00 
    0.0045347353 = product of:
  0.009069471 = sum of:
    0.009069471 = product of:
      0.018138941 = sum of:
        0.018138941 = weight(_text_:d in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018138941 = score(doc=565,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 8(2002) no.4, x S
  6. Lightle, K.S.; Ridgway, J.S.: Generation of XML records across multiple metadata standards (2003) 0.00 
    0.0036646193 = product of:
  0.0073292386 = sum of:
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014658477 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 9(2003) no.9, x S
  7. Patton, M.; Reynolds, D.; Choudhury, G.S.; DiLauro, T.: Toward a metadata generation framework : a case study at Johns Hopkins University (2004) 0.00 
    0.0036646193 = product of:
  0.0073292386 = sum of:
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014658477 = score(doc=1192,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In the June 2003 issue of D-Lib Magazine, Kenney et al. (2003) discuss a comparative study between Cornell's email reference staff and Google's Answers service. This interesting study provided insights on the potential impact of "computing and simple algorithms combined with human intelligence" for library reference services. As mentioned in the Kenney et al. article, Bill Arms (2000) had discussed the possibilities of automated digital libraries in an even earlier D-Lib article. Arms discusses not only automating reference services, but also another library function that seems to inspire lively debates about automation-metadata creation. While intended to illuminate, these debates sometimes generate more heat than light. In an effort to explore the potential for automating metadata generation, the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) of the Sheridan Libraries at The Johns Hopkins University developed and tested an automated name authority control (ANAC) tool. ANAC represents a component of a digital workflow management system developed in connection with the digital Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music. The evaluation of ANAC followed the spirit of the Kenney et al. study that was, as they stated, "more exploratory than scientific." These ANAC evaluation results are shared with the hope of fostering constructive dialogue and discussions about the potential for semi-automated techniques or frameworks for library functions and services such as metadata creation. The DKC's research agenda emphasizes the development of tools that combine automated processes and human intervention, with the overall goal of involving humans at higher levels of analysis and decision-making. Others have looked at issues regarding the automated generation of metadata. A session at the 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries was devoted to automatic metadata creation, and a session at the 2004 conference addressed automated name disambiguation. Commercial vendors such as OCLC, Marcive, and LTI have long used automated techniques for matching names to Library of Congress authority records. We began developing ANAC as a component of a larger suite of open source tools to support workflow management for digital projects. This article describes the goals for the ANAC tool, provides an overview of the metadata records used for testing, describes the architecture for ANAC, and concludes with discussions of the methodology and evaluation of the experiment comparing human cataloging and ANAC-generated results.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 10(2004) no.11, x S
  8. Bearman, D.; Miller, E.; Rust, G.; Trant, J.; Weibel, S.: ¬A common model to support interoperable metadata : progress report on reconciling metadata requirements from the Dublin Core and INDECS/DOI communities (1999) 0.00 
    0.0032390966 = product of:
  0.006478193 = sum of:
    0.006478193 = product of:
      0.012956386 = sum of:
        0.012956386 = weight(_text_:d in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012956386 = score(doc=1249,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.1, xx S
  9. Weibel, S.: ¬The State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative April 1999 (1999) 0.00 
    0.0032065418 = product of:
  0.0064130835 = sum of:
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 6066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012826167 = score(doc=6066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 6066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6066)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.4, xx S
  10. Dekkers, M.; Weibel, S.L.: State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative April 2003 (2003) 0.00 
    0.0032065418 = product of:
  0.0064130835 = sum of:
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 2795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012826167 = score(doc=2795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 2795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2795)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 9(2003) no.4, x S
  11. Godby, C.J.; Young, J.A.; Childress, E.: ¬A repository of metadata crosswalks (2004) 0.00 
    0.0032065418 = product of:
  0.0064130835 = sum of:
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012826167 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 10(2004) no.12, x S
  12. Dekkers, M.; Weibel, S.: Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Progress Report and Workplan for 2002 (2002) 0.00 
    0.0032065418 = product of:
  0.0064130835 = sum of:
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012826167 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 8(2002) no.2, x S
  13. Blanchi, C.; Petrone, J.: Distributed interoperable metadata registry (2001) 0.00 
    0.0032065418 = product of:
  0.0064130835 = sum of:
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 1228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012826167 = score(doc=1228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 7(2001) no.12, x S
  14. Miller, E.: ¬An introduction to the Resource Description Framework (1998) 0.00 
    0.0032065418 = product of:
  0.0064130835 = sum of:
    0.0064130835 = product of:
      0.012826167 = sum of:
        0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 1231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012826167 = score(doc=1231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 4(1998) no.5, xx S
  15. Buckland, M.; Chen, A.; Chen, H.M.; Kim, Y.; Lam, B.; Larson, R.; Norgard, B.; Purat, J.; Gey, F.: Mapping entry vocabulary to unfamiliar metadata vocabularies (1999) 0.00 
    0.0027484642 = product of:
  0.0054969285 = sum of:
    0.0054969285 = product of:
      0.010993857 = sum of:
        0.010993857 = weight(_text_:d in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010993857 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.1, xx S
  16. Chan, L.M.; Zeng, M.L.: Metadata interoperability and standardization - a study of methodology, part I : achieving interoperability at the schema level (2006) 0.00 
    0.002290387 = product of:
  0.004580774 = sum of:
    0.004580774 = product of:
      0.009161548 = sum of:
        0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009161548 = score(doc=1176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 12(2006) no.6, x S
  17. Weibel, S.L.; Koch, T.: ¬The Dublin Core Metatdata Initiative : mission, current activities, and future directions (2000) 0.00 
    0.002290387 = product of:
  0.004580774 = sum of:
    0.004580774 = product of:
      0.009161548 = sum of:
        0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 1237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009161548 = score(doc=1237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1237)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 6(2000) no.12, xx S
  18. Baker, T.: Languages for Dublin Core (1998) 0.00 
    0.0022673677 = product of:
  0.0045347353 = sum of:
    0.0045347353 = product of:
      0.009069471 = sum of:
        0.009069471 = weight(_text_:d in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009069471 = score(doc=1257,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.10389925 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Over the past three years, the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative has achieved a broad international consensus on the semantics of a simple element set for describing electronic resources. Since the first workshop in March 1995, which was reported in the very first issue of D-Lib Magazine, Dublin Core has been the topic of perhaps a dozen articles here. Originally intended to be simple and intuitive enough for authors to tag Web pages without special training, Dublin Core is being adapted now for more specialized uses, from government information and legal deposit to museum informatics and electronic commerce. To meet such specialized requirements, Dublin Core can be customized with additional elements or qualifiers. However, these refinements can compromise interoperability across applications. There are tradeoffs between using specific terms that precisely meet local needs versus general terms that are understood more widely. We can better understand this inevitable tension between simplicity and complexity if we recognize that metadata is a form of human language. With Dublin Core, as with a natural language, people are inclined to stretch definitions, make general terms more specific, specific terms more general, misunderstand intended meanings, and coin new terms. One goal of this paper, therefore, will be to examine the experience of some related ways to seek semantic interoperability through simplicity: planned languages, interlingua constructs, and pidgins. The problem of semantic interoperability is compounded when we consider Dublin Core in translation. All of the workshops, documents, mailing lists, user guides, and working group outputs of the Dublin Core Initiative have been in English. But in many countries and for many applications, people need a metadata standard in their own language. In principle, the broad elements of Dublin Core can be defined equally well in Bulgarian or Hindi. Since Dublin Core is a controlled standard, however, any parallel definitions need to be kept in sync as the standard evolves. Another goal of the paper, then, will be to define the conceptual and organizational problem of maintaining a metadata standard in multiple languages. In addition to a name and definition, which are meant for human consumption, each Dublin Core element has a label, or indexing token, meant for harvesting by search engines. For practical reasons, these machine-readable tokens are English-looking strings such as Creator and Subject (just as HTML tags are called HEAD, BODY, or TITLE). These tokens, which are shared by Dublin Cores in every language, ensure that metadata fields created in any particular language are indexed together across repositories. As symbols of underlying universal semantics, these tokens form the basis of semantic interoperability among the multiple Dublin Cores. As long as we limit ourselves to sharing these indexing tokens among exact translations of a simple set of fifteen broad elements, the definitions of which fit easily onto two pages, the problem of Dublin Core in multiple languages is straightforward. But nothing having to do with human language is ever so simple. Just as speakers of various languages must learn the language of Dublin Core in their own tongues, we must find the right words to talk about a metadata language that is expressable in many discipline-specific jargons and natural languages and that inevitably will evolve and change over time.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 4(1998) no.12, xx S
  19. Chan, L.M.; Zeng, M.L.: Metadata interoperability and standardization - a study of methodology, part II : achieving interoperability at the record and repository levels (2006) 0.00 
    0.0018323096 = product of:
  0.0036646193 = sum of:
    0.0036646193 = product of:
      0.0073292386 = sum of:
        0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073292386 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 12(2006) no.6, x S
  20. Baker, T.; Dekkers, M.: Identifying metadata elements with URIs : The CORES resolution (2003) 0.00 
    0.0018323096 = product of:
  0.0036646193 = sum of:
    0.0036646193 = product of:
      0.0073292386 = sum of:
        0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073292386 = score(doc=1199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 9(2003) no.7/8, x S

Authors

Years

Themes