-
Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000)
0.04
0.041934937 = product of:
0.083869874 = sum of:
0.083869874 = sum of:
0.04504282 = weight(_text_:i in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04504282 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038827058 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Jizba, L.; Hillmann, D.I.: Insights from Ithaca : an interview with Diane Hillmann on metadata, Dublin Core, the National Science Digital Library, and more (2004/05)
0.04
0.041934937 = product of:
0.083869874 = sum of:
0.083869874 = sum of:
0.04504282 = weight(_text_:i in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04504282 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.038827058 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038827058 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In an interview, Diane I. Hillmann, an expert in metadata for digital libraries and currently co-principal investigator for the National Science Digital Library Registry based at Cornell University, discusses her education and career, and provides overviews and insights on metadata initiatives, including standards and models such as the widely adopted Dublin Core schema. She shares her professional interests from the early part of her career with communications, cataloging, and database production services; highlights key issues; and provides ideas and resources for managing changes in metadata standards and digital projects.
- Date
- 2.12.2007 19:35:22
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.04
0.03594423 = product of:
0.07188846 = sum of:
0.07188846 = sum of:
0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03860813 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.033280335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033280335 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Margaritopoulos, T.; Margaritopoulos, M.; Mavridis, I.; Manitsaris, A.: ¬A conceptual framework for metadata quality assessment (2008)
0.04
0.03594423 = product of:
0.07188846 = sum of:
0.07188846 = sum of:
0.03860813 = weight(_text_:i in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03860813 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.033280335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033280335 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004)
0.03
0.029953526 = product of:
0.059907053 = sum of:
0.059907053 = sum of:
0.03217344 = weight(_text_:i in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03217344 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.027733613 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027733613 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000)
0.02
0.023962822 = product of:
0.047925644 = sum of:
0.047925644 = sum of:
0.025738753 = weight(_text_:i in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025738753 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.02218689 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02218689 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Dublin Core is often presented as a modern form of catalog card -- a set of elements (and now qualifiers) that describe resources in a complete package. Sometimes it is proposed as an exchange format for sharing records among multiple collections. The founding principle that "every element is optional and repeatable" reinforces the notion that a Dublin Core description is to be taken as a whole. This paper, in contrast, is based on a much different premise: Dublin Core is a language. More precisely, it is a small language for making a particular class of statements about resources. Like natural languages, it has a vocabulary of word-like terms, the two classes of which -- elements and qualifiers -- function within statements like nouns and adjectives; and it has a syntax for arranging elements and qualifiers into statements according to a simple pattern. Whenever tourists order a meal or ask directions in an unfamiliar language, considerate native speakers will spontaneously limit themselves to basic words and simple sentence patterns along the lines of "I am so-and-so" or "This is such-and-such". Linguists call this pidginization. In such situations, a small phrase book or translated menu can be most helpful. By analogy, today's Web has been called an Internet Commons where users and information providers from a wide range of scientific, commercial, and social domains present their information in a variety of incompatible data models and description languages. In this context, Dublin Core presents itself as a metadata pidgin for digital tourists who must find their way in this linguistically diverse landscape. Its vocabulary is small enough to learn quickly, and its basic pattern is easily grasped. It is well-suited to serve as an auxiliary language for digital libraries. This grammar starts by defining terms. It then follows a 200-year-old tradition of English grammar teaching by focusing on the structure of single statements. It concludes by looking at the growing dictionary of Dublin Core vocabulary terms -- its registry, and at how statements can be used to build the metadata equivalent of paragraphs and compositions -- the application profile.
- Date
- 26.12.2011 14:01:22
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.02
0.02218689 = product of:
0.04437378 = sum of:
0.04437378 = product of:
0.08874756 = sum of:
0.08874756 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08874756 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.019413529 = product of:
0.038827058 = sum of:
0.038827058 = product of:
0.077654116 = sum of:
0.077654116 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077654116 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
Weibel, S.L.; Miller, E.J.: Image Description on the Internet : Summary of CNI/OCLC Image Metadata Workshop (2001)
0.02
0.01608672 = product of:
0.03217344 = sum of:
0.03217344 = product of:
0.06434688 = sum of:
0.06434688 = weight(_text_:i in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06434688 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes: OCLC and the Internet: An Historical Overview of Research Activities, 1990-1999 - Part I
-
Weibel, S.L.: Border crossings : reflections on a decade of metadata consensus building (2005)
0.02
0.01608672 = product of:
0.03217344 = sum of:
0.03217344 = product of:
0.06434688 = sum of:
0.06434688 = weight(_text_:i in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06434688 = score(doc=1187,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In June of this year, I performed my final official duties as part of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative management team. It is a happy irony to affix a seal on that service in this journal, as both D-Lib Magazine and the Dublin Core celebrate their tenth anniversaries. This essay is a personal reflection on some of the achievements and lessons of that decade. The OCLC-NCSA Metadata Workshop took place in March of 1995, and as we tried to understand what it meant and who would care, D-Lib magazine came into being and offered a natural venue for sharing our work. I recall a certain skepticism when Bill Arms said "We want D-Lib to be the first place people look for the latest developments in digital library research." These were the early days in the evolution of electronic publishing, and the goal was ambitious. By any measure, a decade of high-quality electronic publishing is an auspicious accomplishment, and D-Lib (and its host, CNRI) deserve congratulations for having achieved their goal. I am grateful to have been a contributor. That first DC workshop led to further workshops, a community, a variety of standards in several countries, an ISO standard, a conference series, and an international consortium. Looking back on this evolution is both satisfying and wistful. While I am pleased that the achievements are substantial, the unmet challenges also provide a rich till in which to cultivate insights on the development of digital infrastructure.
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.015688501 = product of:
0.031377003 = sum of:
0.031377003 = product of:
0.062754005 = sum of:
0.062754005 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062754005 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.015688501 = product of:
0.031377003 = sum of:
0.031377003 = product of:
0.062754005 = sum of:
0.062754005 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062754005 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.01
0.013866806 = product of:
0.027733613 = sum of:
0.027733613 = product of:
0.055467226 = sum of:
0.055467226 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055467226 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.01
0.013866806 = product of:
0.027733613 = sum of:
0.027733613 = product of:
0.055467226 = sum of:
0.055467226 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055467226 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.01
0.013866806 = product of:
0.027733613 = sum of:
0.027733613 = product of:
0.055467226 = sum of:
0.055467226 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055467226 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14336278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metadata education : asserting a central role in information organization (2002)
0.01
0.0136500355 = product of:
0.027300071 = sum of:
0.027300071 = product of:
0.054600142 = sum of:
0.054600142 = weight(_text_:i in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054600142 = score(doc=5457,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part I
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Content metadata : an analysis of Etruscan artifacts in a museum of archeology (2005)
0.01
0.0136500355 = product of:
0.027300071 = sum of:
0.027300071 = product of:
0.054600142 = sum of:
0.054600142 = weight(_text_:i in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054600142 = score(doc=176,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata schemes target resources as information-packages, without attention to the distinction between content and carrier. Most schema are derived without empirical understanding of the concepts that need to be represented, the ways in which terms representing the central concepts might best be derived, and how metadata descriptions will be used for retrieval. Research is required to resolve this dilemma, and much research will be required if the plethora of schemes that already exist are to be made efficacious for resource description and retrieval. Here I report the results of a preliminary study, which was designed to see whether the bibliographic concept of "the work" could be of any relevance among artifacts held by a museum. I extend the "works metaphor" from the bibliographic to the artifactual domain, by altering the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. Case studies of Etruscan artifacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in non-documentary artifacts.
-
Hopkins, J.: USMARC as metadata shell (1999)
0.01
0.012869377 = product of:
0.025738753 = sum of:
0.025738753 = product of:
0.051477507 = sum of:
0.051477507 = weight(_text_:i in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051477507 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper introduces the two concepts of Content and Coding which together define Metadata. The encoding scheme used to hold the data content is referred to as a shell. One such shell is the MARC format. In this paper I describe the MARC format and its application to Internet resources, primarily through the OCLC-sponsored Intercat Project
-
Chan, L.M.; Zeng, M.L.: Metadata interoperability and standardization - a study of methodology, part I : achieving interoperability at the schema level (2006)
0.01
0.01137503 = product of:
0.02275006 = sum of:
0.02275006 = product of:
0.04550012 = sum of:
0.04550012 = weight(_text_:i in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04550012 = score(doc=1176,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The rapid growth of Internet resources and digital collections has been accompanied by a proliferation of metadata schemas, each of which has been designed based on the requirements of particular user communities, intended users, types of materials, subject domains, project needs, etc. Problems arise when building large digital libraries or repositories with metadata records that were prepared according to diverse schemas. This article (published in two parts) contains an analysis of the methods that have been used to achieve or improve interoperability among metadata schemas and applications, for the purposes of facilitating conversion and exchange of metadata and enabling cross-domain metadata harvesting and federated searches. From a methodological point of view, implementing interoperability may be considered at different levels of operation: schema level, record level, and repository level. Part I of the article intends to explain possible situations in which metadata schemas may be created or implemented, whether in individual projects or in integrated repositories. It also discusses approaches used at the schema level. Part II of the article will discuss metadata interoperability efforts at the record and repository levels.
-
Madsen, M.S.; Fogg, I.; Ruggles, C.: Metadata systems : integrative information technologies (1994)
0.01
0.011260705 = product of:
0.02252141 = sum of:
0.02252141 = product of:
0.04504282 = sum of:
0.04504282 = weight(_text_:i in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04504282 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15441231 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04093939 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
