-
Metadata and semantics research : 9th Research Conference, MTSR 2015, Manchester, UK, September 9-11, 2015, Proceedings (2015)
0.04
0.03731085 = product of:
0.0746217 = sum of:
0.050323877 = weight(_text_:management in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050323877 = score(doc=3274,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
0.024297824 = product of:
0.04859565 = sum of:
0.04859565 = weight(_text_:science in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04859565 = score(doc=3274,freq=10.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.39046016 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- LCSH
- Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 544
- Subject
- Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)
-
Metadata and semantics research : 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings (2014)
0.03
0.032947272 = product of:
0.065894544 = sum of:
0.041936565 = weight(_text_:management in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041936565 = score(doc=2192,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
0.023957977 = product of:
0.047915954 = sum of:
0.047915954 = weight(_text_:science in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047915954 = score(doc=2192,freq=14.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38499892 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 8th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2014, held in Karlsruhe, Germany, in November 2014. The 23 full papers and 9 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 57 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks. They cover the following topics: metadata and linked data: tools and models; (meta) data quality assessment and curation; semantic interoperability, ontology-based data access and representation; big data and digital libraries in health, science and technology; metadata and semantics for open repositories, research information systems and data infrastructure; metadata and semantics for cultural collections and applications; semantics for agriculture, food and environment.
- Content
- Metadata and linked data.- Tools and models.- (Meta)data quality assessment and curation.- Semantic interoperability, ontology-based data access and representation.- Big data and digital libraries in health, science and technology.- Metadata and semantics for open repositories, research information systems and data infrastructure.- Metadata and semantics for cultural collections and applications.- Semantics for agriculture, food and environment.
- LCSH
- Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 478
- Subject
- Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)
-
Desconnets, J.-C.; Chahdi, H.; Mougenot, I.: Application profile for earth observation images (2014)
0.03
0.027096223 = product of:
0.054192446 = sum of:
0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 1573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04151508 = score(doc=1573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1573)
0.01267737 = product of:
0.02535474 = sum of:
0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 1573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02535474 = score(doc=1573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1573)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Based on the concept of an application profile as proposed by the Dublin Core initiative, the work presented in this manuscript attempts to propose an application profile for the Earth Observation images. This approach aims to provide an open and extensible model facilitating the sharing and management of distributed images within decentralized architectures. It is intended to eventually cover the needs of discovery, localization, consulting, preservation and processing of data for decision support. We are using the Singapore framework recommendations to build the application profile. A particular focus on the formalization and representation of Description Set Profile (DSP) in RDF is proposed.
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 478
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.03
0.025058959 = product of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036221053 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06401478 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.03
0.025058959 = product of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036221053 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06401478 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.03
0.025058959 = product of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036221053 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06401478 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Managing metadata in web-scale discovery systems (2016)
0.02
0.024166744 = product of:
0.04833349 = sum of:
0.041089278 = weight(_text_:management in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041089278 = score(doc=3336,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.0072442107 = product of:
0.014488421 = sum of:
0.014488421 = weight(_text_:science in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488421 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This book shows you how to harness the power of linked data and web-scale discovery systems to manage and link widely varied content across your library collection. Libraries are increasingly using web-scale discovery systems to help clients find a wide assortment of library materials, including books, journal articles, special collections, archival collections, videos, music and open access collections. Depending on the library material catalogued, the discovery system might need to negotiate different metadata standards, such as AACR, RDA, RAD, FOAF, VRA Core, METS, MODS, RDF and more. In Managing Metadata in Web-Scale Discovery Systems, editor Louise Spiteri and a range of international experts show you how to: * maximize the effectiveness of web-scale discovery systems * provide a smooth and seamless discovery experience to your users * help users conduct searches that yield relevant results * manage the sheer volume of items to which you can provide access, so your users can actually find what they need * maintain shared records that reflect the needs, languages, and identities of culturally and ethnically varied communities * manage metadata both within, across, and outside, library discovery tools by converting your library metadata to linked open data that all systems can access * manage user generated metadata from external services such as Goodreads and LibraryThing * mine user generated metadata to better serve your users in areas such as collection development or readers' advisory. The book will be essential reading for cataloguers, technical services and systems librarians and library and information science students studying modules on metadata, cataloguing, systems design, data management, and digital libraries. The book will also be of interest to those managing metadata in archives, museums and other cultural heritage institutions.
- LCSH
- Metadata / Management
- Subject
- Metadata / Management
-
Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013)
0.02
0.021229852 = product of:
0.042459704 = sum of:
0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029653627 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
0.012806077 = product of:
0.025612153 = sum of:
0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025612153 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
- Series
- Advances in information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.651-662
-
Handbook of metadata, semantics and ontologies (2014)
0.02
0.020396732 = product of:
0.040793464 = sum of:
0.033549253 = weight(_text_:management in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033549253 = score(doc=5134,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.21066327 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
0.0072442107 = product of:
0.014488421 = sum of:
0.014488421 = weight(_text_:science in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488421 = score(doc=5134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata research has emerged as a discipline cross-cutting many domains, focused on the provision of distributed descriptions (often called annotations) to Web resources or applications. Such associated descriptions are supposed to serve as a foundation for advanced services in many application areas, including search and location, personalization, federation of repositories and automated delivery of information. Indeed, the Semantic Web is in itself a concrete technological framework for ontology-based metadata. For example, Web-based social networking requires metadata describing people and their interrelations, and large databases with biological information use complex and detailed metadata schemas for more precise and informed search strategies. There is a wide diversity in the languages and idioms used for providing meta-descriptions, from simple structured text in metadata schemas to formal annotations using ontologies, and the technologies for storing, sharing and exploiting meta-descriptions are also diverse and evolve rapidly. In addition, there is a proliferation of schemas and standards related to metadata, resulting in a complex and moving technological landscape - hence, the need for specialized knowledge and skills in this area. The Handbook of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies is intended as an authoritative reference for students, practitioners and researchers, serving as a roadmap for the variety of metadata schemas and ontologies available in a number of key domain areas, including culture, biology, education, healthcare, engineering and library science.
- LCSH
- Database management
- Subject
- Database management
-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.02
0.020047165 = product of:
0.08018866 = sum of:
0.08018866 = sum of:
0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028976843 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.051211823 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051211823 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Scientific repositories create a new environment for studying traditional information science issues. The interaction between indexing terms provided by users and controlled vocabularies continues to be an area of debate and study. This article reports and analyzes findings from a study that mapped the relationships between free text keywords and controlled vocabulary terms used in the sciences. Based on this study's findings recommendations are made about which vocabularies may be better to use in scientific data repositories.
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
-
Rousidis, D.; Garoufallou, E.; Balatsoukas, P.; Sicilia, M.-A.: Evaluation of metadata in research data repositories : the case of the DC.Subject Element (2015)
0.02
0.019354446 = product of:
0.03870889 = sum of:
0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029653627 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.009055263 = product of:
0.018110527 = sum of:
0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018110527 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Research Data repositories are growing in terms of volume rapidly and exponentially. Their main goal is to provide scientists the essential mechanism to store, share, and re-use datasets generated at various stages of the research process. Despite the fact that metadata play an important role for research data management in the context of these repositories, several factors - such as the big volume of data and its complex lifecycles, as well as operational constraints related to financial resources and human factors - may impede the effectiveness of several metadata elements. The aim of the research reported in this paper was to perform a descriptive analysis of the DC.Subject metadata element and to identify its data quality problems in the context of the Dryad research data repository. In order to address this aim a total of 4.557 packages and 13.638 data files were analysed following a data-preprocessing method. The findings showed emerging trends about the subject coverage of the repository (e.g. the most popular subjects and the authors that contributed the most for these subjects). Also, quality problems related to the lack of controlled vocabulary and standardisation were very common. This study has implications for the evaluation of metadata and the improvement of the quality of the research data annotation process.
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 544
-
Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016)
0.02
0.01754127 = product of:
0.07016508 = sum of:
0.07016508 = sum of:
0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02535474 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.044810344 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044810344 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
-
Kleeck, D. Van; Langford, G.; Lundgren, J.; Nakano, H.; O'Dell, A.J.; Shelton, T.: Managing bibliographic data quality in a consortial academic library : a case study (2016)
0.01
0.014677797 = product of:
0.05871119 = sum of:
0.05871119 = weight(_text_:management in 5133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05871119 = score(doc=5133,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 5133, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5133)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article presents a case study of quality management for print and electronic resource metadata, summarizing problems and solutions encountered by the Cataloging and Discovery Services Department in the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida. The authors discuss national, state, and local standards for cataloging, automated and manual record enhancements for data, user feedback, and statewide consortial factors. Findings show that adherence to standards, proactive cleanup of data via manual processes and automated tools, collaboration with vendors and stakeholders, and continual assessment of workflows are key to the management of biblio-graphic data quality in consortial academic libraries.
-
Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018)
0.01
0.0144048855 = product of:
0.057619542 = sum of:
0.057619542 = sum of:
0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025612153 = score(doc=4550,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03200739 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In 2016, the University of Waterloo began offering a mediated copyright review and deposit service to support the growth of our institutional repository UWSpace. This resulted in the need to batch import large lists of published works into the institutional repository quickly and accurately. A range of methods have been proposed for harvesting publications metadata en masse, but many technological solutions can easily become detached from a workflow that is both reproducible for support staff and applicable to a range of situations. Many repositories offer the capacity for batch upload via CSV, so our method provides a template Python script that leverages the Habanero library for populating CSV files with existing metadata retrieved from the CrossRef API. In our case, we have combined this with useful metadata contained in a TSV file downloaded from Web of Science in order to enrich our metadata as well. The appeal of this 'low-maintenance' method is that it provides more robust options for gathering metadata semi-automatically, and only requires the user's ability to access Web of Science and the Python program, while still remaining flexible enough for local customizations.
- Date
- 10.11.2018 16:27:22
-
Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012)
0.01
0.012840398 = product of:
0.05136159 = sum of:
0.05136159 = weight(_text_:management in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05136159 = score(doc=2086,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Information resource attributes - metadata for information retrieval - metadata sources and quality - economics and management of metadata - knowledge organization systems - the semantic web - books and e-books, websites and audiovisual resources - business and government documents - learning resources - the field of information/knowledge organization.
- RSWK
- Metadaten / Management (BVB)
- Subject
- Metadaten / Management (BVB)
-
Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017)
0.01
0.012529479 = product of:
0.050117917 = sum of:
0.050117917 = sum of:
0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018110527 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03200739 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:30:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.830-844
-
Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018)
0.01
0.012529479 = product of:
0.050117917 = sum of:
0.050117917 = sum of:
0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018110527 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03200739 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.5, S.633-646
-
Tani, A.; Candela, L.; Castelli, D.: Dealing with metadata quality : the legacy of digital library efforts (2013)
0.01
0.01037877 = product of:
0.04151508 = sum of:
0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 2662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04151508 = score(doc=2662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2662)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.6, S.1194-1205
-
Koch, G.; Koch, W.: Aggregation and management of metadata in the context of Europeana (2017)
0.01
0.01037877 = product of:
0.04151508 = sum of:
0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 3910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04151508 = score(doc=3910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3910)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Kopácsi, S.; Hudak, R.; Ganguly, R.: Implementation of a classification server to support metadata organization for long term preservation systems (2017)
0.01
0.01037877 = product of:
0.04151508 = sum of:
0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 3915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04151508 = score(doc=3915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3915)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In diesem Artikel beschreiben wir die Implementierung eines Klassifikationsservers für Metadatenorganisation in einem Langzeitarchivierungssystem für digitale Objekte. Nach einer kurzen Einführung in Klassifikationen und Wissensorganisationen stellen wir die Anforderungen an das zu implementierende System vor. Wir beschreiben sämtliche Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) Management Tools, die wir untersucht haben, darunter auch Skosmos, die Lösung, die wir für die Implementierung gewählt haben. Skosmos ist ein open source, webbasierter SKOS Browser, basierend auf dem Jena Fuseki SPARQL Server. Wir diskutieren einige entscheidende Schritte während der Installation der ausgewählten Tools und präsentieren sowohl die potentiell auftretenden Probleme mit den verwendeten Klassifikationen als auch mögliche Lösungen.
