Search (34 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.01 
    0.006627898 = product of:
  0.03976739 = sum of:
    0.03976739 = product of:
      0.07953478 = sum of:
        0.07953478 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07953478 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  2. Lipetz, B.-A.: ¬The usefulness of indexes (1989) 0.01 
    0.0058152988 = product of:
  0.03489179 = sum of:
    0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03489179 = score(doc=812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  3. Evans, R.: Indexing computer books : getting started (2007) 0.01 
    0.0058152988 = product of:
  0.03489179 = sum of:
    0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03489179 = score(doc=745,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 745, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=745)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Sie wollen Ihr Indexing-Business erweitern? Sie erwägen ein weiteres Fachgebiet, wie z. B. Computer-Bücher? Indexer, die neu im Bereich Computer-Bücher sind, haben wahrscheinlich mehrere Fragen: Was sind Computer-Bücher? Wie unterscheiden sie sich von akademischen Werken? Wo ist der Markt für diesen Bereich? Wer ist die Leserschaft? Wie anspruchsvoll sind sie? Habe ich das nötige technische Fachwissen, um diese Bücher zu verstehen und dafür Register zu erstellen? Gibt es Tipps und Tricks für das Indexieren? Was sind die besten Programme? Wie viel kann man verdienen? Welche Ressourcen sind verfügbar? Dieser Artikel beschreibt den Prozess des Indexierens von Computer-Büchern, der einen Mittelweg zwischen Kosten und Qualität findet, was dem Indexierer erlaubt, mit oft technischem und unvertrautem Material umzugehen und es in einer planmäßigen und logischen Weise zu indexieren.
  4. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.01 
    0.005356151 = product of:
  0.032136906 = sum of:
    0.032136906 = product of:
      0.06427381 = sum of:
        0.06427381 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06427381 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  5. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.01 
    0.005356151 = product of:
  0.032136906 = sum of:
    0.032136906 = product of:
      0.06427381 = sum of:
        0.06427381 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06427381 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  6. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.00 
    0.0047342135 = product of:
  0.028405279 = sum of:
    0.028405279 = product of:
      0.056810558 = sum of:
        0.056810558 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056810558 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  7. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.00 
    0.0037873704 = product of:
  0.022724222 = sum of:
    0.022724222 = product of:
      0.045448445 = sum of:
        0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045448445 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
  8. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.00 
    0.0037873704 = product of:
  0.022724222 = sum of:
    0.022724222 = product of:
      0.045448445 = sum of:
        0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045448445 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  9. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.00 
    0.0037873704 = product of:
  0.022724222 = sum of:
    0.022724222 = product of:
      0.045448445 = sum of:
        0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045448445 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  10. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.00 
    0.0037873704 = product of:
  0.022724222 = sum of:
    0.022724222 = product of:
      0.045448445 = sum of:
        0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045448445 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  11. Fassbender, J.: Professionelle Registererstellung : Das DNI informierte auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2006 (2007) 0.00 
    0.0033922575 = product of:
  0.020353545 = sum of:
    0.020353545 = weight(_text_:b in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020353545 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.13700598 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    4. Ferner wurde darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass mit dem DNI auch im deutschsprachigen Raum eine Plattform für professionelles Indexing vorhanden ist, die sowohl hervorragende Kontakte zu den weltweit führenden angloamerikanischen Fachverbänden unterhält als auch Indexerinnen und Indexer für die Registererstellung für Fach- und Sachbücher als auch Periodika und Online-Medien bereitstellt. Maureen MacGlashan von der britischen Society of Indexers (SI) hielt einen Vortrag über die Fachzeitschrift The Indexer, das internationale Fachblatt der Indexing-Szene schlechthin. Maureen MacGlashan ist die derzeitige Hauptherausgeberin und erläuterte die Entstehungsgeschichte und Inhalte dieser bereits 1958 gegründeten Zeitschrift sowie deren Website www. theindexer.org, auf der ein Online-Index zur Verfügung steht. Ferner machte sie auf die im Oktober 2006 erscheinende Ausgabe aufmerksam, die als Schwerpunkt viele Aspekte des Indexing außerhalb des englischen Sprachraums beinhaltet. An dieser Ausgabe hatte auch das DNI als Gastherausgeber mitgearbeitet. Ein absolutes Debüt auf der Buchmesse war der Vortrag von Frances Lennie aus den USA, die mit CINDEX erstmals eine Dedicated Indexing Software vorstellte. Jede Person, die derartige Software kennen gelernt hat, weiß um den großen Unterschied zu der mühseligen Indexerstellung in Word. Frances Lennie zeigte, wie leicht und elegant Haupt- und Untereinträge sowie Querverweise mit CINDEX erstellt werden können. Die mit dieser Software viel effizienter erstellten Registereinträge lassen sich anschließend sogar in Word-Dokumente einbetten. Ein reichlich gedeckter Tisch mit InfoMaterial (z. B. Hefte von The Indexer, CDs mit einer Demo-Version von CINDEX) und der Hinweis, dass sowohl Mitglieder des DNI als auch die Society of Indexers Seminare zum professionellen Indexing anbieten, rundete die gelungene Veranstaltung ab. Weitere Informationen zum DNI und zur Registererstellung finden sich auf der DNI-Website www.d-indexer.org."
  12. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.00 
    0.003313949 = product of:
  0.019883694 = sum of:
    0.019883694 = product of:
      0.03976739 = sum of:
        0.03976739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03976739 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  13. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.00 
    0.003313949 = product of:
  0.019883694 = sum of:
    0.019883694 = product of:
      0.03976739 = sum of:
        0.03976739 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03976739 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  14. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.00 
    0.0023671067 = product of:
  0.014202639 = sum of:
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.

Authors

Years

Themes