Search (125 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Holbert, S.: How to index Windows-based online help (2000) 0.04
    0.04125583 = product of:
      0.13201866 = sum of:
        0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022169823 = score(doc=224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
        0.028758926 = product of:
          0.057517853 = sum of:
            0.057517853 = weight(_text_:online in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057517853 = score(doc=224,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.6035623 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015712982 = weight(_text_:information in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015712982 = score(doc=224,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
        0.01904665 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01904665 = score(doc=224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
        0.04633028 = weight(_text_:software in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04633028 = score(doc=224,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Abstract
    Today, more and more software packages come with online documentation. Some have complete manuals as well. Others have basic documentation on paper and more advanced information online. I recently purchased a computer that came with 20 software programs and not one page of written documentation. More and more, users have to find information by searching online. Most documentation teams focus on writing and ignore the problems of information retrieval, making information in printed documents difficult to find, and online information impossible to find. With online Help, you cannot browse the documentation. You cannot even browse more than a couple of inches of the index at a time. If online users do not get superb guidance into the jungle of online Help, they go away like the hero of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, saying "Oh, the horror! The horror!" How does an online Help index work? The following examples are based on the Windows 95 Help-type system, but do not represent actual Help screens
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  2. Moncrief, L.: Indexing computer-related documents (2000) 0.03
    0.031548023 = product of:
      0.1261921 = sum of:
        0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040864702 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.022169823 = weight(_text_:web in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022169823 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006414798 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.05674277 = weight(_text_:software in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05674277 = score(doc=214,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    The explosion in personal computing and in computer technology has brought a wealth of opportunities for indexers. Annually, traditional publishers produce numerous books on computer topics, while software and hardware companies constantly issue new products with manuals that require indexes. Indexers can find work with these high-technology publishers or can subcontract with technical documentation firms or with freelance technical writers. The range of audiences for computer-related documents is wide and varied, as is the range of topics. These documents are not limited to end-user software manuals, but include programming, Internet, and networking topics among others. Hardware companies, in addition to computer manufacturers, are also a good potential source of clients. Many hardware products have a sizeable software component that requires its own set of indexed manuals. There are advantages and disadvantages to working with high-technology companies (and their contractors) vs. working with traditional publishers. It is simply a matter of personal taste which type of client you prefer. I have truly enjoyed working with both.
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  3. Craven, T.C.: Adapting of string indexing systems for retrieval using proximity operators (1988) 0.03
    0.025232531 = product of:
      0.100930125 = sum of:
        0.012781745 = product of:
          0.02556349 = sum of:
            0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02556349 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008553064 = weight(_text_:information in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008553064 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
        0.035914708 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035914708 = score(doc=705,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
        0.043680605 = weight(_text_:software in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043680605 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the idea of using a conventional string indexing source description, together with a special phrase generator, to generate multiple descriptor phrases for inclusion in a database record for online retrieval. For use with proximity operators, these multiple descriptor phrases should attempt to meet such objectives as bringing together groups of syntactically related words. Software for generating multiple descriptor phrases from source descriptions in a specific existing string indexing system is briefly described
    Source
    Information processing and management. 24(1988), S.133-140
  4. Fetters, L.: ¬A book-style index for the web : the University of Texas policies and procedures website (1998) 0.02
    0.023031132 = product of:
      0.12283271 = sum of:
        0.052254777 = weight(_text_:web in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052254777 = score(doc=3766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
        0.01597718 = product of:
          0.03195436 = sum of:
            0.03195436 = weight(_text_:online in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03195436 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.054600753 = weight(_text_:software in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054600753 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the process of creating a web index for an online index of printed documents. Includes practical examples of HTML linking, and the use of named software
  5. Broccoli, K.; Ravenswaay, G.V.: Web indexing : anchors away! (2000) 0.02
    0.022009995 = product of:
      0.11738664 = sum of:
        0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040864702 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
        0.07010714 = weight(_text_:web in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07010714 = score(doc=219,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
        0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006414798 = score(doc=219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    In this chapter we turn to embedded indexing for the Internet, frequently called Web indexing. We will define Web indexes; describe the structure of entries for Web indexes; present some of the challenges that Web indexers face; and compare Web indexes to search engines. One of the difficulties in defining Web indexes is their relative newness. The first pages were placed on the World Wide Web in 1991 when Tim Berners Lee, its founder, uploaded four files. We are in a period of transition, moving from using well-established forms of writing and communications to others that are still in their infancy. Paramount among these is the Web. For indexers, this is an uncharted voyage where we must jettison firmly established ideas while developing new ones. Where the voyage will end is anyone's guess.
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  6. Connolly, D.A.: ¬The many uses of Email discussion lists (2000) 0.02
    0.01904705 = product of:
      0.10158426 = sum of:
        0.040864702 = weight(_text_:wide in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040864702 = score(doc=216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13912784 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
        0.05430476 = weight(_text_:web in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05430476 = score(doc=216,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
        0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006414798 = score(doc=216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    If you want to let other indexers know about a great new medical dictionary, discuss the pros and cons of using prepositions in subentries, find an indexer in Phoenix, or maybe share some marketing tips, then consider joining an email discussion list. Email discussion lists provide numerous tools and opportunities for indexers, especially for freelancers. Despite the rapid growth of Web- and graphical-based communication, email remains the linchpin of electronic communication. While the World Wide Web has become ubiquitous in our society, email remains the most reliable form of electronic communication. Email access is more prevalent than Web access, less cumbersome, and some would say, more egalitarian. Despite improvements over time, Web access is not available in equal quality or proportion to email access, especially in poorer or developing areas. Indeed, many users who have access to both restrict their use of the Web for important research efforts, and maintain nearconstant connection with their email servers for daily business
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  7. Hert, C.A.; Jacob, E.K.; Dawson, P.: ¬A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment (2000) 0.02
    0.018615106 = product of:
      0.074460424 = sum of:
        0.045253962 = weight(_text_:web in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045253962 = score(doc=5158,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
        0.00798859 = product of:
          0.01597718 = sum of:
            0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01597718 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005345665 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
        0.015872208 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015872208 = score(doc=5158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    Usability of Web sites has become an increasingly important area of research as Web sites proliferate and problems with use are noted. Generally, aspects of Web sites that have been investigated focus on such areas as overall design and navigation. The exploratory study reported on here investigates one specific component of a Web site-the index structure. By employing index usability metrics developed by Liddy and Jörgensen (1993; Jörgensen & Liddy, 1996) and modified to accommodate a hypertext environment, the study compared the effectiveness and efficiency of 20 subjects who used one existing index (the A-Z index on the FedStats Web site at http://www.fedstats.gov) and three experimental variants to complete five researcher-generated tasks. User satisfaction with the indexes was also evaluated. The findings indicate that a hypertext index with multiple access points for each concept, all linked to the same resource, led to greater effectiveness and efficiency of retrieval on almost all measures. Satisfaction measures were more variable. The study offers insight into potential improvements in the design of Web-based indexes and provides preliminary assessment of the validity of the measures employed
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.11, S.971-988
  8. Fetters, L.K.: Progress in indexing software (1988) 0.02
    0.017644484 = product of:
      0.14115587 = sum of:
        0.03195436 = product of:
          0.06390872 = sum of:
            0.06390872 = weight(_text_:online in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06390872 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.67062473 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.109201506 = weight(_text_:software in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109201506 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.87662494 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Online. 12(1988), S.116-123
  9. Rowland, M.J.: Plunging in : creating a Web site index for an online newsletter (2000) 0.02
    0.016487788 = product of:
      0.087934874 = sum of:
        0.06661203 = weight(_text_:web in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06661203 = score(doc=221,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.65002745 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
        0.01597718 = product of:
          0.03195436 = sum of:
            0.03195436 = weight(_text_:online in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03195436 = score(doc=221,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005345665 = score(doc=221,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Creating an online index for a Web site is not a job for the timid. Those contemplating this form of Web indexing should already be accomplished indexers and should have strong experience in Web page creation. Knowledge of HTML is essential. In fact, depending on the nature of a Web indexing job, you may find that it requires more HTML knowledge than indexing skill. Like embedded indexing, Web site indexing is far more work than traditional indexing: the choice of terms is constrained, and the indexing process itself is slower and more challenging. Entries must be carefully chosen because the editing process can be tedious and time-consuming, sometimes more time-consuming than making the original entries. Hypertext links and anchors must be added, and the index itself must be tested to make sure that links work as intended. Adequate compensation for your project is imperative. Web indexing does have its rewards, though, especially for indexers who are intrigued by the Web and Web page design, for those who like a challenge, and, of course, for those who like to have their work online for all the world to see. This article provides a look at the process of creating a Web index for an online newsletter. It is also applicable to other forms of Web site indexing, and should give the beginning Web site indexer an idea of what to expect on that first job
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  10. Browne, G.: Changes in website indexing (2007) 0.02
    0.016387634 = product of:
      0.08740072 = sum of:
        0.025864797 = weight(_text_:web in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025864797 = score(doc=747,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
        0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074839313 = score(doc=747,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
        0.05405199 = weight(_text_:software in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05405199 = score(doc=747,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Website-Indexing wurde in den 1990er Jahren wichtig, als Indexierer, Bibliothekare und Web-Manager mit verschiedenen Ansätzen experimentierten, einen besseren Zugang zu Informationen zu schaffen, die sie über das Internet anboten. Die Tools, mit denen Register erstellt werden, reichten von simpler HTML-Codierung bis zu HTML Indexer und anderer spezieller Software. Neue Indexe und Software-Produkte entstanden, aber viele Website-Register sind auch wieder verschwunden. Es werden die Gründe für die Erstellung von Website-Indexen dargestellt und Beispiele von Website-Indexen und anderen Zugangsoptionen erläutert, die in den letzten 15 Jahren entstanden, die aber nicht mehr zur Verfügung stehen. Es werden einige Vermutungen über die Gründe für diese Veränderungen angestellt.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.437-440
  11. Walker, D.: Subject-oriented Web indexing (2000) 0.01
    0.014757534 = product of:
      0.078706846 = sum of:
        0.06270573 = weight(_text_:web in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06270573 = score(doc=218,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
        0.009586309 = product of:
          0.019172618 = sum of:
            0.019172618 = weight(_text_:online in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019172618 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006414798 = weight(_text_:information in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006414798 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    My goal in this short article is to bring you up to speed on Web indexing. I assume you are a person with good word skills and an inquisitive mind. Also, I assume you have good keyboard skills, access to the Internet, and have already created some HTML pages using, say, Netscape Composer. You may need help from your Internet Service Provider (ISP) to upload pages onto your Web site. This article is based on my experience teaching an online interactive course in Web indexing for my company, WWWalker Web Development, in 1998. We develop Web sites, support Linux and Windows NT, write technical articles, and specialize in Web indexing.
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  12. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01
    0.01298456 = product of:
      0.069250986 = sum of:
        0.008553064 = weight(_text_:information in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008553064 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
        0.043680605 = weight(_text_:software in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043680605 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
        0.017017314 = product of:
          0.03403463 = sum of:
            0.03403463 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03403463 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10995905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Recycling eines Buchregisters Eine Index-Revision liegt dann vor, wenn das Register zu einer vorhergehenden Auflage eines Buches für die Neuauflage überarbeitet wird. Es gibt Vor- und Nachteile beim Versuch, einen Index zu überarbeiten - sowie verschiedene Erfolgsmaßstäbe. Eine detaillierte Fallstudie wir vorgestellt und die benutzte Software-Methode beschrieben.
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.394-398
  13. Rowland, M.J.: Web site design for indexers (2000) 0.01
    0.012297943 = product of:
      0.06558903 = sum of:
        0.052254777 = weight(_text_:web in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052254777 = score(doc=225,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
        0.00798859 = product of:
          0.01597718 = sum of:
            0.01597718 = weight(_text_:online in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01597718 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005345665 = weight(_text_:information in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005345665 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Do indexers really need Web sites? No, they do not. Indexers do not need computers either. Indexes can be done on cards; networking can be done at conferences; and marketing can be done with cold calls. But, just as email has become indispensable to communication, and computers have become essential to indexing, so Web sites have become more and more necessary for all types of businesses, particularly small companies with small advertising budgets, like indexing businesses. The amount of business being conducted on the Web is increasing exponentially. Publishers, packagers, and other potential clients are beginning to search the Web for indexers. Why not participate in e-commerce, the newest way of doing business? A good Web site not only helps you obtain work, it increases your professional reputation and helps you influence the future of indexing. You can use your site as an online resume, to display a list of all the books you have indexed in the past year, to provide examples of your work, and to network with others. You can use it to express your philosophy of indexing, to teach others about indexing, and to make your voice heard on issues affecting the indexing profession. Not all indexers need Web sites, but active, involved, and far-sighted indexers, like you, do!
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  14. Walker, D.: Web indexing prize 1997 (1998) 0.01
    0.011996393 = product of:
      0.095971145 = sum of:
        0.07679853 = weight(_text_:web in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07679853 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.7494315 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
        0.019172618 = product of:
          0.038345236 = sum of:
            0.038345236 = weight(_text_:online in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038345236 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the 20 entries to the 1997 AusSI web indexing prize, with a discussion of trends in web and online indexing
  15. Wright, J.C.: ¬The world of embedded indexing (2000) 0.01
    0.011763191 = product of:
      0.06273702 = sum of:
        0.0147798825 = weight(_text_:web in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0147798825 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
        0.004276532 = weight(_text_:information in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004276532 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
        0.043680605 = weight(_text_:software in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043680605 = score(doc=217,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Here's the scenario: Your favorite client calls to tell you they are changing their processes. "We've decided to go completely electronic and embed the indexing in the files. Can you do that?" It looks like your life and the way you do your work is going to change if you say yes. But before you do, make sure you know enough about the new process to know whether you want to take on the project. Embedded indexing brings a whole new level of complexity to the indexing process. You will need to incorporate new software technologies and special editing/index-compiling skills with the traditional thought and analysis that has always gone into the indexing process. What do we mean when we say you can embed indexing into files? The simplest answer is the one that Nancy Mulvany gives in Indexing Books: Embedded indexing software is generally a feature found in word processing or page design software such as WordPerfect or Ventura Publisher. Embedded indexing software allows the indexer to insert index entries (or tags for entries) directly into the document's text files. In other words, instead of writing an index in CINDEX, Macrex, or SkyIndex, you put the index entries directly into the same files that are used to create the book. Many companies use Microsoft Word, PageMaker, FrameMaker, or Quark to create their manuals and books, editing, layout, and printing directly from the program files. Pasting up pages manually and creating galleys are not part of electronic publishing. Everything lives in files, from the time it is written until the time it goes to the publisher's printing plates. When you embed indexing codes into these files, the publisher has no worry about what page numbers go into the index until the very end. If needed, files can go through layout, content and copy-edit changes even after indexing is completed. This approach also permits indexing and text to be re-used in the next edition or even converted into hyperactive links!
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
  16. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994) 0.01
    0.011489503 = product of:
      0.061277352 = sum of:
        0.022368053 = product of:
          0.044736106 = sum of:
            0.044736106 = weight(_text_:online in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044736106 = score(doc=949,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074839313 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
        0.031425368 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031425368 = score(doc=949,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
  17. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997) 0.01
    0.011489503 = product of:
      0.061277352 = sum of:
        0.022368053 = product of:
          0.044736106 = sum of:
            0.044736106 = weight(_text_:online in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044736106 = score(doc=3905,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0074839313 = weight(_text_:information in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074839313 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
        0.031425368 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031425368 = score(doc=3905,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
  18. Earle, R.E.; Berry, R.; Nichols, M.C.: Indexing online information (1996) 0.01
    0.010516357 = product of:
      0.056087233 = sum of:
        0.022138633 = product of:
          0.044277266 = sum of:
            0.044277266 = weight(_text_:online in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044277266 = score(doc=5126,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.4646225 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008553064 = weight(_text_:information in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008553064 = score(doc=5126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
        0.025395533 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025395533 = score(doc=5126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    To take full advantage of search facilities, online indexes can be designed with a flat structure in which each index entry is clearly worded and makes use of keywords from the subject matter. Indexers can include additional keywords as synonyms that point to the relevant index entries. When indexers take advantage of these concepts and when index users clearly understand what to expect from online indexes, then the indexs become an extremely powerful retrieval medium
  19. Wright, J.C.: Indexing after the millenium 1 : getting the tools right (1998) 0.01
    0.0095427325 = product of:
      0.050894573 = sum of:
        0.029559765 = weight(_text_:web in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029559765 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
        0.012781745 = product of:
          0.02556349 = sum of:
            0.02556349 = weight(_text_:online in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02556349 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008553064 = weight(_text_:information in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008553064 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly discusses 3 developing areas in indexing: embedded indexing, online and interactive indexing, and Web-based indexing. Sees these areas as new challenges for indexers' skills and suggests that indexers should be influencing the development of information tools and of the publishing process in the electronic environment
  20. Woods, X.B.: Envisioning the word : Multimedia CD-ROM indexing (2000) 0.01
    0.009364363 = product of:
      0.04994327 = sum of:
        0.0147798825 = weight(_text_:web in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0147798825 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10247572 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
        0.004276532 = weight(_text_:information in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004276532 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
        0.030886853 = weight(_text_:software in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030886853 = score(doc=223,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124570385 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.24794699 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    If you are an indexer who is accustomed to working in solitude with static words, you might face some big surprises in the production of a multimedia CD-ROM. You will not be working alone. You will not be working from a manuscript. Your dexterity with a dedicated software tool for indexing will be irrelevant. The coding or tagging might not be your worry either, because it will likely be done by members of a separate technical staff. The CD-ROM can currently hold 660 megabytes of data. Its production is a massive team effort. Because of the sheer volume of data involved, it is unlikely that one indexer working alone can handle the job in a reasonable period of time. The database for the actual index entries is likely to have been designed specifically for the project at hand, so the indexers will learn the software tools on the job. The entire project will probably be onscreen. So, if you choose to thrust yourself into this teeming amalgam of production, what are the prerequisites and what new things can you expect to learn? CD-ROM is an amorphous new medium with few rules. Your most important resume items might be your flexibility, imagination, and love of words. What remains unchanged from traditional back-of-the-book indexing is the need for empathy with the user; you will still need to come up with exactly the right word for the situation. What is new here is the situation: you might learn to envision the words that correspond to non-textual media such as graphics, photos, video clips, and musical passages. And because you will be dealing with vast amounts of textual and sensory data, you might find yourself rethinking the nature and purpose of an index as a whole. CD-ROM production can take many forms; three will be discussed here
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.

Years