-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.03
0.029299825 = product of:
0.05859965 = sum of:
0.029444784 = weight(_text_:m in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029444784 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.029154865 = product of:
0.05830973 = sum of:
0.05830973 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05830973 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Diepeveen, C.; Fassbender, J.; Robertson, M.: Indexing software (2007)
0.02
0.015032275 = product of:
0.03006455 = sum of:
0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010515994 = score(doc=742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
0.019548554 = product of:
0.039097108 = sum of:
0.039097108 = weight(_text_:da in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039097108 = score(doc=742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1475006 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.26506406 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Dieser Beitrag handelt von unterschiedlichen Arten verfügbarer Software zur Erzeugung von Registern und untersucht, ob diese dazu benutzt werden können, ein Register nach internationalen Normen zu erstellen. Da oft behauptet wird, dass die Registererstellung mit einem Computer und ohne Einsatz des Menschen durchführbar sei, untersuchen die Autoren, weshalb Indexieren eine Aktivität des Menschen sein muss und weshalb eine automatische Registererstellung kein zufriedenstellendes Register hervorbringen kann. Automatische Registererstellung kann bestenfalls einen Ausgangspunkt zur weiteren Indexierung liefern. Anschließend wird die Möglichkeit der Registererstellung mit allgemein verfügbarer Software untersucht. Dies kann akzeptable Register hervorbringen, wenngleich oft nur auf mühsame Weise. Für den professionellen Indexierer stellt daher spezielle Indexing Software die bevorzugte Option dar. Die drei am meisten benutzten speziellen Indexierungsprogramme werden kurz bewertet. Ausrichtung und Aussehen dieser Programme sind sehr unterschiedlich, aber die Merkmale und Output-Optionen sind sehr ähnlich. Website Indexing ist ein relativ neues Spezialgebiet innerhalb der Disziplin des Indexierens. Zwei Programme - eine Freeware und ein kommerzielles - zur Erstellung von Registern von Websites werden erörtert. Das Fazit insgesamt ist, dass das Registermachen eine Aktivität ist, die intellektuellen Input des Menschen benötigt. Software kann den Input hervorragend verbessern, aber nicht den Anteil des Menschen daran ersetzen.
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.008329961 = product of:
0.033319846 = sum of:
0.033319846 = product of:
0.06663969 = sum of:
0.06663969 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06663969 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.008329961 = product of:
0.033319846 = sum of:
0.033319846 = product of:
0.06663969 = sum of:
0.06663969 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06663969 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.008329961 = product of:
0.033319846 = sum of:
0.033319846 = product of:
0.06663969 = sum of:
0.06663969 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06663969 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.008329961 = product of:
0.033319846 = sum of:
0.033319846 = product of:
0.06663969 = sum of:
0.06663969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06663969 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.01
0.0072887163 = product of:
0.029154865 = sum of:
0.029154865 = product of:
0.05830973 = sum of:
0.05830973 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05830973 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.0072887163 = product of:
0.029154865 = sum of:
0.029154865 = product of:
0.05830973 = sum of:
0.05830973 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05830973 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.01
0.0072887163 = product of:
0.029154865 = sum of:
0.029154865 = product of:
0.05830973 = sum of:
0.05830973 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05830973 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.01
0.0072887163 = product of:
0.029154865 = sum of:
0.029154865 = product of:
0.05830973 = sum of:
0.05830973 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05830973 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.01
0.0072887163 = product of:
0.029154865 = sum of:
0.029154865 = product of:
0.05830973 = sum of:
0.05830973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05830973 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.01
0.0072887163 = product of:
0.029154865 = sum of:
0.029154865 = product of:
0.05830973 = sum of:
0.05830973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05830973 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.01
0.0072887163 = product of:
0.029154865 = sum of:
0.029154865 = product of:
0.05830973 = sum of:
0.05830973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05830973 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.01
0.0058901724 = product of:
0.02356069 = sum of:
0.02356069 = product of:
0.04712138 = sum of:
0.04712138 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04712138 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.01
0.005206226 = product of:
0.020824904 = sum of:
0.020824904 = product of:
0.041649807 = sum of:
0.041649807 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041649807 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007)
0.00
0.0041649807 = product of:
0.016659923 = sum of:
0.016659923 = product of:
0.033319846 = sum of:
0.033319846 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033319846 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 18:41:22
-
Beyond book indexing : how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media (2000)
0.00
0.0037179654 = product of:
0.014871862 = sum of:
0.014871862 = weight(_text_:m in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014871862 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Editor
- Brenner, D. u. M. Rowland
- Type
- m
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.00
0.0036443581 = product of:
0.014577433 = sum of:
0.014577433 = product of:
0.029154865 = sum of:
0.029154865 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029154865 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Fassbender, J.: Professionelle Registererstellung : Das DNI informierte auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2006 (2007)
0.00
0.0034209972 = product of:
0.013683989 = sum of:
0.013683989 = product of:
0.027367977 = sum of:
0.027367977 = weight(_text_:da in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027367977 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1475006 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.18554485 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- "Wie bereits in den Vorjahren hielt das Deutsche Netzwerk der Indexer (DNI) auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2006 sein Jahrestreffen ab - diesmal im Rahmen der Jahreskonferenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis (DGI). Im Mittelpunkt des Treffens stand eine offene Informationsveranstaltung mit Präsentationen zu Aspekten professioneller Registererstellung, die sehr gut besucht war. Neben Gästen aus der Publikationsbranche sowie von der DGI kamen Indexer vom Niederländischen Indexer-Netzwerk sowie spezielle Gäste aus den USA und Großbritannien. Jochen Fassbender vom DNI hielt einen Vortrag über grundsätzliche Thesen zur Lage des Indexing in Deutschland. Die im internationalen Vergleich noch erhebliche Defizite aufweisende Situation im deutschsprachigen Raum wurde durch vier Bereiche beleuchtet. 1. Registererstellung beschränkt sich keineswegs nur - wie immer noch weitläufig angenommen - auf das bloße Anstreichen von Textwörtern. Eine derartige Vorgehensweise führt zu konkordanzähnlichen Verzeichnissen statt zu Registern. Es geht vielmehr darum, das Gemeinte aus dem Text in Registereinträge umzusetzen und diese mit einem Beziehungsgeflecht zu verbinden. 2. Die Erstellung von Registern durch Autoren, Herausgebern oder gar Hilfskräften - womöglich kurz vor Ende eines Projektes - hat oft erhebliche Mängel zur Folge, da aus Fachkreisen immer wieder bestätigt wird, dass derartige Personengruppen - im Gegensatz zu professionellen Indexern - kaum über adäquates Fachwissen zur methodischen Vorgehensweise bei der Registererstellung noch über geeignete Indexing-Programme verfügen. 3. Moderne Registererstellung muss keineswegs mit Tools wie Word oder Layout-Programmen durchgeführt werden, deren Einsatz aus Indexer-Sicht z. T. erhebliche Nachteile mit sich bringt. Der weitaus größte Teil der weltweit arbeitenden Indexer arbeitet mit so genannter Dedicated Indexing Software, welche die vielfachen Aspekte bei der Registererstellung hervorragend unterstützt.
-
Moncrief, L.: Indexing computer-related documents (2000)
0.00
0.0031547982 = product of:
0.012619193 = sum of:
0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012619193 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Issue
- Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
