Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.02

0.0219953 = product of:
  0.1099765 = sum of:
    0.1099765 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1099765 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26

Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.02

0.0219953 = product of:
  0.1099765 = sum of:
    0.1099765 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1099765 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18

Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.02

0.0219953 = product of:
  0.1099765 = sum of:
    0.1099765 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1099765 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20

Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.02

0.0219953 = product of:
  0.1099765 = sum of:
    0.1099765 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1099765 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141

Rice, R.: Putting sample indexes on your Web site (2000) 0.02
```
0.019507391 = product of:
  0.09753695 = sum of:
    0.09753695 = weight(_text_:mail in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09753695 = score(doc=226,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.3466428 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Why do you need samples of your indexing work on your Web site? Think about these situations: Scenario 1: You've contacted a potential client who says he has a project ready to be assigned. He requests some samples of your work. You fax them to him right away and call back a few hours later. "Oh," he says, "I didn't get the fax but anyway I already assigned the project. I can keep your name for future reference, though." Scenario 2: Another potential client asks you to send her some samples and if they're satisfactory, she'll put you on the freelance list. You mail them to her, or even FedEx them if you can spend the money. You wait a week and call her back. She does not remember who you are, and has not seen the samples. If she can find them, she says, she will file them for future reference. Scenario 3: You contacted a potential client who has asked to see some samples of your work. As it happens, she has a project ready to go and if your work is acceptable, you can have the job. You can FedEx her some samples, or you can fax them, she says. You think about FedEx and faxing costs, and mail and faxes that never get to her desk, and the risk of losing the assignment if she calls someone else later today, which she almost surely will, and you suggest an alternative. If she has Internet access, she can see a list of the indexes you've completed, and some samples of your indexes instantly. She is impressed that you have the know-how to create a Web site, and agrees to take a look and call you back shortly. You give her your URL and your phone number, and stand by. In five minutes she calls you back, says she is pleased with what she saw, and asks for your address so she can send the job out to you today.

Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.02

0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127

Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.02

0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122

Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02

0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13

Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02

0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28

Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.02

0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24

Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.02

0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194

Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.02

0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180

Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.02

0.019245887 = product of:
  0.096229434 = sum of:
    0.096229434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096229434 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 17.10.2005 13:54:22

Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02

0.015553026 = product of:
  0.07776513 = sum of:
    0.07776513 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07776513 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote: Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95

Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.01

0.013747062 = product of:
  0.06873531 = sum of:
    0.06873531 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06873531 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83

Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01

0.01099765 = product of:
  0.05498825 = sum of:
    0.05498825 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05498825 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 8.12.2007 18:41:22

Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01

0.009622944 = product of:
  0.048114717 = sum of:
    0.048114717 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048114717 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 8.12.2007 19:25:22

Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01
```
0.006873531 = product of:
  0.034367654 = sum of:
    0.034367654 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034367654 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.

Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Themes