Search (39 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Anker, J.: Some principles of a systematically arranged subject catalogue with an index (1956) 0.02
    0.017817017 = product of:
      0.035634033 = sum of:
        0.035634033 = product of:
          0.07126807 = sum of:
            0.07126807 = weight(_text_:j in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07126807 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.02
    0.017487664 = product of:
      0.034975328 = sum of:
        0.034975328 = product of:
          0.069950655 = sum of:
            0.069950655 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069950655 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  3. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02
    0.017487664 = product of:
      0.034975328 = sum of:
        0.034975328 = product of:
          0.069950655 = sum of:
            0.069950655 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069950655 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  4. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.02
    0.015457057 = product of:
      0.030914115 = sum of:
        0.030914115 = product of:
          0.06182823 = sum of:
            0.06182823 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06182823 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  5. Shuter, J.: Indexing standards : where do they come from and what use are they? (1993) 0.02
    0.015271729 = product of:
      0.030543458 = sum of:
        0.030543458 = product of:
          0.061086915 = sum of:
            0.061086915 = weight(_text_:j in 8091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061086915 = score(doc=8091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 8091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.01
    0.012365646 = product of:
      0.024731291 = sum of:
        0.024731291 = product of:
          0.049462583 = sum of:
            0.049462583 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049462583 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  7. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.01
    0.012365646 = product of:
      0.024731291 = sum of:
        0.024731291 = product of:
          0.049462583 = sum of:
            0.049462583 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049462583 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  8. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01
    0.012365646 = product of:
      0.024731291 = sum of:
        0.024731291 = product of:
          0.049462583 = sum of:
            0.049462583 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049462583 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  9. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.01
    0.01081994 = product of:
      0.02163988 = sum of:
        0.02163988 = product of:
          0.04327976 = sum of:
            0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04327976 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
  10. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.01
    0.01081994 = product of:
      0.02163988 = sum of:
        0.02163988 = product of:
          0.04327976 = sum of:
            0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04327976 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  11. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01
    0.01081994 = product of:
      0.02163988 = sum of:
        0.02163988 = product of:
          0.04327976 = sum of:
            0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04327976 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  12. Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.010181152 = product of:
      0.020362305 = sum of:
        0.020362305 = product of:
          0.04072461 = sum of:
            0.04072461 = weight(_text_:j in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04072461 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01
    0.0077285287 = product of:
      0.015457057 = sum of:
        0.015457057 = product of:
          0.030914115 = sum of:
            0.030914115 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030914115 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
  14. Fisher, J.: ¬An index to historical fiction for children and young people (1994) 0.01
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = product of:
          0.030543458 = sum of:
            0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030543458 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Indexing: providing access to information : looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, Alexandria, VA, May 1993 (1993) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 8077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=8077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 8077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ZAFRAN, E.L. u. C. MacKAY: Keeping up with the times (& the deadlines): indexing at BNA (Bureau of National Affairs); PRESCHEL, B.M.: Delivering database information to the user: technology, media, content; MULHOLLAND, S.: Indexing and the challenge of change at PsycINFO; LOCKE, C.: Weaving the social fabric; WEINBERG, B.H.: Computer-assisted database indexing; HODGE, G.M.: Computer-assisted database indexing: the state of the art; HUMPHREY, S.M.: The MedIndEx prototype for computer-assisted MEDLINE database indexing; KOLL, M.B.: Automatic relevance ranking: a searcher's complement to indexing; ANDERSON, J.D.: Indexing standards: are they possible? What good are they? Why bother?; SHUTER, J.: Standards for indexes: where do the come from and what use are they?; COUSINS, G.: Professional indexing in Australia: first steps towards accreditation; McFADDEN, T.G.: I wonder who's indexing the Internet now?; WALLIS, E.: Indexing training and accreditation in UK; BELL, H.K.: Vive la difference! The survival of the softest; LIDDY, E.D. u. C.L. JÖRGENSEN: Reality check: book index characteristics that ficilitate information sccess; KLEINBERG, I.: Making the case for professional indexers: where is the proof?
  16. Diepeveen, C.; Fassbender, J.; Robertson, M.: Indexing software (2007) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Hedden, H.: ¬The accidental taxonomist (2012) 0.01
    0.005090576 = product of:
      0.010181152 = sum of:
        0.010181152 = product of:
          0.020362305 = sum of:
            0.020362305 = weight(_text_:j in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020362305 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IWP 64(2013) H.6, S.373-374 (J. Fassbender)
  18. Fassbender, J.: Professionelle Registererstellung : Das DNI informierte auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2006 (2007) 0.00
    0.004454254 = product of:
      0.008908508 = sum of:
        0.008908508 = product of:
          0.017817017 = sum of:
            0.017817017 = weight(_text_:j in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017817017 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.12287348 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Hedden, H.: Indexing specialities : Web Sites (2007) 0.00
    0.0038179322 = product of:
      0.0076358644 = sum of:
        0.0076358644 = product of:
          0.015271729 = sum of:
            0.015271729 = weight(_text_:j in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015271729 = score(doc=1146,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.105320126 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IWP 60(2009) H.4, S.245 (J. Fassbender): "Heather Heddens Buch über Website-Indexing gehört zur Indexing Specialties-Serie, die vom Information Today-Verlag in Zusammenarbeit mit der American Society of Indexers herausgegeben wird. Der Bereich Website-Indexing befasst sich mit der Index-Erstellung und -Pflege für Websites und Intranets - ähnlich zu Registern für Printpublikationen. Ein Website-Index hat oft die Bezeichnung Site Index oder A-Z Index und sollte zudem nicht mit Site Maps verwechselt werden. Das Buch füllt gerade auch hierzulande eine Riesenlücke aus: Nach Einschätzung des Deutschen Netzwerks der Indexer (DNI) ist das Wissensdefizit über Website-Indexing in der deutschen Web- und IT-Szene enorm. Die Autorin beginnt in diesem Sinne auch gleich mit zwei Kernaussagen des Buches: 1. Website-Indexing sei deshalb in der Web-Szene nicht so verbreitet, weil die Kenntnisse der Methoden zur Index-Erstellung fehlen und/oder die nötigen Tools unbekannt sind. 2. Ein guter Index stelle für viele Sites die effektivste Suchmethode dar - trotz der Konkurrenz zu Navigationsmenüs und Sucheingabe. Verdeutlicht werden sodann die Unterschiede zu Print-Registern, der bedeutendste betrifft die Locators (Fundstellen), die in der Regel keine Seitenangaben, sondern Links sind.

Types

  • a 32
  • m 6
  • s 1
  • More… Less…