Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02
    0.019755503 = product of:
      0.09877752 = sum of:
        0.09877752 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09877752 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  2. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02
    0.019755503 = product of:
      0.09877752 = sum of:
        0.09877752 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09877752 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  3. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01
    0.014111074 = product of:
      0.07055537 = sum of:
        0.07055537 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07055537 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  4. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.01
    0.014111074 = product of:
      0.07055537 = sum of:
        0.07055537 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07055537 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  5. Evans, J.E.: Some external and internal factors affecting users of interactive information systems (1996) 0.01
    0.013123936 = product of:
      0.06561968 = sum of:
        0.06561968 = weight(_text_:7 in 6262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06561968 = score(doc=6262,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.3803715 = fieldWeight in 6262, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6262)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This contribution reports the results of continuing research in human-information system interactions. Following training and experience with an electronic information retrieval system novice and experienced subject groups responded to questions ranking their value assessments of 7 attributes of information sources in relation to 15 factors describing the search process. In general, novice users were more heavily influenced by the process factors (negative influences) than by the positive attributes of information qualities. Experienced users, while still concerned with process factors, were more strongly influenced by the qualitative information attributes. The specific advantages and contributions of this research are several: higher dimensionality of measured factors and attributes (15 x 7); higher granularity of analysis using a 7 value metric in a closed-end Likert scale; development of bi-directional, firced-choice influence vectors; and a larger sample size (N=186) than previously reported in the literature
  6. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01
    0.011288859 = product of:
      0.056444295 = sum of:
        0.056444295 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056444295 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  7. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01
    0.011288859 = product of:
      0.056444295 = sum of:
        0.056444295 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056444295 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  8. Clarke, S.J.; Willett, P.: Estimating the recall performance of Web search engines (1997) 0.01
    0.010102809 = product of:
      0.050514046 = sum of:
        0.050514046 = weight(_text_:7 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050514046 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.2928101 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 49(1997) no.7, S.184-189
  9. Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994) 0.01
    0.009877752 = product of:
      0.04938876 = sum of:
        0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04938876 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
  10. Blair, D.C.: STAIRS Redux : thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after (1996) 0.01
    0.009877752 = product of:
      0.04938876 = sum of:
        0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04938876 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.4-22
  11. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.01
    0.009877752 = product of:
      0.04938876 = sum of:
        0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04938876 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
  12. Brown, M.E.: By any other name : accounting for failure in the naming of subject categories (1995) 0.01
    0.009877752 = product of:
      0.04938876 = sum of:
        0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 5598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04938876 = score(doc=5598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5598)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2.11.1996 13:08:22
  13. Qiu, L.: Markov models of search state patterns in a hypertext information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44(1993) no.7, S.413-427
  14. Hersh, W.R.; Hickam, D.H.: ¬An evaluation of interactive Boolean and natural language searching with an online medical textbook (1995) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.7, S.478-489
  15. Barker, A.L.: Non-Boolean searching on commercial online systems : optimising use of Dialog TARGET and ESA/IRS QUESTQUORUM (1995) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 3853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=3853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3853)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes
  16. Iivonen, M.: Factors lowering the consistency in online searching (1995) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 3869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=3869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3869)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes
  17. Nicholas, D.: Are information professionals really better online searchers than end-users? : (and whose story do you believe?) (1995) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes
  18. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
  19. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92
  20. Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon