Search (106 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.04 
    0.039454747 = product of:
  0.078909494 = sum of:
    0.078909494 = sum of:
      0.038397755 = weight(_text_:k in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038397755 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04545348 = queryNorm
          0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
      0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.003561823 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04545348 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
      0.036949914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036949914 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04545348 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 32(2000) no.1, S.4-8
  2. Kuriyama, K.; Kando, N.; Nozue, T.; Eguchi, K.: Pooling for a large-scale test collection : an analysis of the search results from the First NTCIR Workshop (2002) 0.04 
    0.038576297 = product of:
  0.077152595 = sum of:
    0.077152595 = product of:
      0.11572889 = sum of:
        0.10860524 = weight(_text_:k in 3830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10860524 = score(doc=3830,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.66933334 = fieldWeight in 3830, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3830)
        0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 3830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007123646 = score(doc=3830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3830)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information retrieval. 5(2002), S.41-59
  3. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.03 
    0.03150913 = product of:
  0.06301826 = sum of:
    0.06301826 = product of:
      0.094527386 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
        0.086216465 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086216465 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
  4. Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information (2004) 0.03 
    0.027973054 = product of:
  0.055946108 = sum of:
    0.055946108 = product of:
      0.08391916 = sum of:
        0.07679551 = weight(_text_:k in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07679551 = score(doc=4127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
        0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007123646 = score(doc=4127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.25-32
    Source
    SIGIR'04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed.: K. Järvelin, u.a
  5. Kwok, K.-L.: Ten years of ad hoc retrieval at TREC using PIRCS (2005) 0.03 
    0.027973054 = product of:
  0.055946108 = sum of:
    0.055946108 = product of:
      0.08391916 = sum of:
        0.07679551 = weight(_text_:k in 5090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07679551 = score(doc=5090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 5090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5090)
        0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 5090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007123646 = score(doc=5090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5090)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.321-346
  6. Sparck Jones, K.: Metareflections on TREC (2005) 0.03 
    0.027973054 = product of:
  0.055946108 = sum of:
    0.055946108 = product of:
      0.08391916 = sum of:
        0.07679551 = weight(_text_:k in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07679551 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
        0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007123646 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.421-448
  7. Fan, W.; Luo, M.; Wang, L.; Xi, W.; Fox, E.A.: Tuning before feedback : combining ranking discovery and blind feedback for robust retrieval (2004) 0.02 
    0.023310876 = product of:
  0.04662175 = sum of:
    0.04662175 = product of:
      0.069932625 = sum of:
        0.063996255 = weight(_text_:k in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063996255 = score(doc=4052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
        0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059363716 = score(doc=4052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.138-145
    Source
    SIGIR'04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed.: K. Järvelin, u.a
  8. Kazai, G.; Lalmas, M.: ¬The overlap problem in content-oriented XML retrieval evaluation (2004) 0.02 
    0.023310876 = product of:
  0.04662175 = sum of:
    0.04662175 = product of:
      0.069932625 = sum of:
        0.063996255 = weight(_text_:k in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063996255 = score(doc=4083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
        0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059363716 = score(doc=4083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.72-79
    Source
    SIGIR'04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed.: K. Järvelin, u.a
  9. Amitay, E.; Carmel, D.; Lempel, R.; Soffer, A.: Scaling IR-system evaluation using Term Relevance Sets (2004) 0.02 
    0.023310876 = product of:
  0.04662175 = sum of:
    0.04662175 = product of:
      0.069932625 = sum of:
        0.063996255 = weight(_text_:k in 4118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063996255 = score(doc=4118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 4118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4118)
        0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 4118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059363716 = score(doc=4118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4118)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.10-17
    Source
    SIGIR'04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference an Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed.: K. Järvelin, u.a
  10. Sparck Jones, K.: Summary performance comparisons TREC-2 through TREC-8 (2001) 0.02 
    0.01706567 = product of:
  0.03413134 = sum of:
    0.03413134 = product of:
      0.102394015 = sum of:
        0.102394015 = weight(_text_:k in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102394015 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Pirkola, A.; Järvelin, K.: Employing the resolution power of search keys (2001) 0.02 
    0.016317615 = product of:
  0.03263523 = sum of:
    0.03263523 = product of:
      0.048952844 = sum of:
        0.044797383 = weight(_text_:k in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044797383 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
        0.00415546 = weight(_text_:s in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00415546 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.7, S.575-583
  12. Palmquist, R.A.; Kim, K.-S.: Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance (2000) 0.01 
    0.014478311 = product of:
  0.028956622 = sum of:
    0.028956622 = product of:
      0.043434933 = sum of:
        0.038397755 = weight(_text_:k in 4605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038397755 = score(doc=4605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4605)
        0.0050371783 = weight(_text_:s in 4605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050371783 = score(doc=4605,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4605, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4605)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.6, S.558-566
  13. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: Measuring typographical errors' impact on retrieval in bibliographic databases (2007) 0.01 
    0.013986527 = product of:
  0.027973054 = sum of:
    0.027973054 = product of:
      0.04195958 = sum of:
        0.038397755 = weight(_text_:k in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038397755 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
        0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003561823 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.197-211
  14. Radev, D.R.; Libner, K.; Fan, W.: Getting answers to natural language questions on the Web (2002) 0.01 
    0.011655438 = product of:
  0.023310876 = sum of:
    0.023310876 = product of:
      0.034966312 = sum of:
        0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031998128 = score(doc=5204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
        0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029681858 = score(doc=5204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.5, S.359-364
  15. Kekäläinen, J.; Järvelin, K.: Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation (2002) 0.01 
    0.011655438 = product of:
  0.023310876 = sum of:
    0.023310876 = product of:
      0.034966312 = sum of:
        0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031998128 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
        0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029681858 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1120-xxxx
  16. Talvensaari, T.; Laurikkala, J.; Järvelin, K.; Juhola, M.: ¬A study on automatic creation of a comparable document collection in cross-language information retrieval (2006) 0.01 
    0.011655438 = product of:
  0.023310876 = sum of:
    0.023310876 = product of:
      0.034966312 = sum of:
        0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 5601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031998128 = score(doc=5601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5601)
        0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 5601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029681858 = score(doc=5601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5601)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 62(2006) no.3, S.372-387
  17. TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005) 0.01 
    0.011655438 = product of:
  0.023310876 = sum of:
    0.023310876 = product of:
      0.034966312 = sum of:
        0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031998128 = score(doc=636,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
        0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029681858 = score(doc=636,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: 1. The Text REtrieval Conference - Ellen M. Voorhees and Donna K. Harman 2. The TREC Test Collections - Donna K. Harman 3. Retrieval System Evaluation - Chris Buckley and Ellen M. Voorhees 4. The TREC Ad Hoc Experiments - Donna K. Harman 5. Routing and Filtering - Stephen Robertson and Jamie Callan 6. The TREC Interactive Tracks: Putting the User into Search - Susan T. Dumais and Nicholas J. Belkin 7. Beyond English - Donna K. Harman 8. Retrieving Noisy Text - Ellen M. Voorhees and John S. Garofolo 9.The Very Large Collection and Web Tracks - David Hawking and Nick Craswell 10. Question Answering in TREC - Ellen M. Voorhees 11. The University of Massachusetts and a Dozen TRECs - James Allan, W. Bruce Croft and Jamie Callan 12. How Okapi Came to TREC - Stephen Robertson 13. The SMART Project at TREC - Chris Buckley 14. Ten Years of Ad Hoc Retrieval at TREC Using PIRCS - Kui-Lam Kwok 15. MultiText Experiments for TREC - Gordon V. Cormack, Charles L. A. Clarke, Christopher R. Palmer and Thomas R. Lynam 16. A Language-Modeling Approach to TREC - Djoerd Hiemstra and Wessel Kraaij 17. BM Research Activities at TREC - Eric W. Brown, David Carmel, Martin Franz, Abraham Ittycheriah, Tapas Kanungo, Yoelle Maarek, J. Scott McCarley, Robert L. Mack, John M. Prager, John R. Smith, Aya Soffer, Jason Y. Zien and Alan D. Marwick Epilogue: Metareflections on TREC - Karen Sparck Jones
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.6, S.910-911 (J.L. Vicedo u. J. Gomez): "The Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) is a yearly workshop hosted by the U.S. government's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that fosters and supports research in information retrieval as well as speeding the transfer of technology between research labs and industry. Since 1992, TREC has provided the infrastructure necessary for large-scale evaluations of different text retrieval methodologies. TREC impact has been very important and its success has been mainly supported by its continuous adaptation to the emerging information retrieval needs. Not in vain, TREC has built evaluation benchmarks for more than 20 different retrieval problems such as Web retrieval, speech retrieval, or question-answering. The large and intense trajectory of annual TREC conferences has resulted in an immense bulk of documents reflecting the different eval uation and research efforts developed. This situation makes it difficult sometimes to observe clearly how research in information retrieval (IR) has evolved over the course of TREC. TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval succeeds in organizing and condensing all this research into a manageable volume that describes TREC history and summarizes the main lessons learned. The book is organized into three parts. The first part is devoted to the description of TREC's origin and history, the test collections, and the evaluation methodology developed. The second part describes a selection of the major evaluation exercises (tracks), and the third part contains contributions from research groups that had a large and remarkable participation in TREC. Finally, Karen Spark Jones, one of the main promoters of research in IR, closes the book with an epilogue that analyzes the impact of TREC on this research field.
    Pages
    X, 462 S
    Type
    s
  18. King, D.W.: Blazing new trails : in celebration of an audacious career (2000) 0.01 
    0.01125326 = product of:
  0.02250652 = sum of:
    0.02250652 = product of:
      0.03375978 = sum of:
        0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029681858 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
        0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030791596 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Pages
    S.59-78
  19. Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.01 
    0.01125326 = product of:
  0.02250652 = sum of:
    0.02250652 = product of:
      0.03375978 = sum of:
        0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029681858 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
        0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030791596 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
  20. Lioma, C.; Ounis, I.: ¬A syntactically-based query reformulation technique for information retrieval (2008) 0.01 
    0.009652208 = product of:
  0.019304415 = sum of:
    0.019304415 = product of:
      0.028956622 = sum of:
        0.025598504 = weight(_text_:k in 2031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025598504 = score(doc=2031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 2031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2031)
        0.003358119 = weight(_text_:s in 2031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003358119 = score(doc=2031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 2031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2031)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Whereas in language words of high frequency are generally associated with low content [Bookstein, A., & Swanson, D. (1974). Probabilistic models for automatic indexing. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 25(5), 312-318; Damerau, F. J. (1965). An experiment in automatic indexing. American Documentation, 16, 283-289; Harter, S. P. (1974). A probabilistic approach to automatic keyword indexing. PhD thesis, University of Chicago; Sparck-Jones, K. (1972). A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 28, 11-21; Yu, C., & Salton, G. (1976). Precision weighting - an effective automatic indexing method. Journal of the Association for Computer Machinery (ACM), 23(1), 76-88], shallow syntactic fragments of high frequency generally correspond to lexical fragments of high content [Lioma, C., & Ounis, I. (2006). Examining the content load of part of speech blocks for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the international committee on computational linguistics and the association for computational linguistics (COLING/ACL 2006), Sydney, Australia]. We implement this finding to Information Retrieval, as follows. We present a novel automatic query reformulation technique, which is based on shallow syntactic evidence induced from various language samples, and used to enhance the performance of an Information Retrieval system. Firstly, we draw shallow syntactic evidence from language samples of varying size, and compare the effect of language sample size upon retrieval performance, when using our syntactically-based query reformulation (SQR) technique. Secondly, we compare SQR to a state-of-the-art probabilistic pseudo-relevance feedback technique. Additionally, we combine both techniques and evaluate their compatibility. We evaluate our proposed technique across two standard Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) English test collections, and three statistically different weighting models. Experimental results suggest that SQR markedly enhances retrieval performance, and is at least comparable to pseudo-relevance feedback. Notably, the combination of SQR and pseudo-relevance feedback further enhances retrieval performance considerably. These collective experimental results confirm the tenet that high frequency shallow syntactic fragments correspond to content-bearing lexical fragments.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.143-162

Authors

Types

  • a 103
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications