Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Munkelt, J.: Erstellung einer DNB-Retrieval-Testkollektion (2018) 0.00
    0.0011991428 = product of:
      0.022783713 = sum of:
        0.022783713 = weight(_text_:und in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022783713 = score(doc=4310,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05426304 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    Seit Herbst 2017 findet in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek die Inhaltserschließung bestimmter Medienwerke rein maschinell statt. Die Qualität dieses Verfahrens, das die Prozessorganisation von Bibliotheken maßgeblich prägen kann, wird unter Fachleuten kontrovers diskutiert. Ihre Standpunkte werden zunächst hinreichend erläutert, ehe die Notwendigkeit einer Qualitätsprüfung des Verfahrens und dessen Grundlagen dargelegt werden. Zentraler Bestandteil einer künftigen Prüfung ist eine Testkollektion. Ihre Erstellung und deren Dokumentation steht im Fokus dieser Arbeit. In diesem Zusammenhang werden auch die Entstehungsgeschichte und Anforderungen an gelungene Testkollektionen behandelt. Abschließend wird ein Retrievaltest durchgeführt, der die Einsatzfähigkeit der erarbeiteten Testkollektion belegt. Seine Ergebnisse dienen ausschließlich der Funktionsüberprüfung. Eine Qualitätsbeurteilung maschineller Inhaltserschließung im Speziellen sowie im Allgemeinen findet nicht statt und ist nicht Ziel der Ausarbeitung.
    Content
    Bachelorarbeit, Bibliothekswissenschaften, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Technische Hochschule Köln
    Imprint
    Köln : Technische Hochschule, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften
  2. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.00
    4.3645944E-4 = product of:
      0.008292729 = sum of:
        0.008292729 = product of:
          0.016585458 = sum of:
            0.016585458 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016585458 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:20:56
  3. Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011) 0.00
    4.3645944E-4 = product of:
      0.008292729 = sum of:
        0.008292729 = product of:
          0.016585458 = sum of:
            0.016585458 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016585458 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:29:22
  4. Wildemuth, B.; Freund, L.; Toms, E.G.: Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies (2014) 0.00
    4.3645944E-4 = product of:
      0.008292729 = sum of:
        0.008292729 = product of:
          0.016585458 = sum of:
            0.016585458 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016585458 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2015 19:31:22
  5. Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015) 0.00
    4.3645944E-4 = product of:
      0.008292729 = sum of:
        0.008292729 = product of:
          0.016585458 = sum of:
            0.016585458 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016585458 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Rajagopal, P.; Ravana, S.D.; Koh, Y.S.; Balakrishnan, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems using effort-based relevance judgment (2019) 0.00
    4.3645944E-4 = product of:
      0.008292729 = sum of:
        0.008292729 = product of:
          0.016585458 = sum of:
            0.016585458 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016585458 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22