Search (121 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; McKenzie, L.; Irving, A.: Evaluative protocols for searching behaviour in online library catalogues (1991) 0.01 
    0.013934595 = product of:
  0.06967297 = sum of:
    0.06967297 = weight(_text_:r in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06967297 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    r
  2. Aitchison, T.M.: Comparative evaluation of index languages : Part I, Design. Part II, Results (1969) 0.01 
    0.013934595 = product of:
  0.06967297 = sum of:
    0.06967297 = weight(_text_:r in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06967297 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    r
  3. Ferret, O.; Grau, B.; Hurault-Plantet, M.; Illouz, G.; Jacquemin, C.; Monceaux, L.; Robba, I.; Vilnat, A.: How NLP can improve question answering (2002) 0.01 
    0.013719295 = product of:
  0.068596475 = sum of:
    0.068596475 = weight(_text_:o in 1850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068596475 = score(doc=1850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.33260235 = fieldWeight in 1850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1850)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. Munkelt, J.; Schaer, P.; Lepsky, K.: Towards an IR test collection for the German National Library (2018) 0.01 
    0.013719295 = product of:
  0.068596475 = sum of:
    0.068596475 = weight(_text_:o in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068596475 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.33260235 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Automatic content indexing is one of the innovations that are increasingly changing the way libraries work. In theory, it promises a cataloguing service that would hardly be possible with humans in terms of speed, quantity and maybe quality. The German National Library (DNB) has also recognised this potential and is increasingly relying on the automatic indexing of their catalogue content. The DNB took a major step in this direction in 2017, which was announced in two papers. The announcement was rather restrained, but the content of the papers is all the more explosive for the library community: Since September 2017, the DNB has discontinued the intellectual indexing of series Band H and has switched to an automatic process for these series. The subject indexing of online publications (series O) has been purely automatical since 2010; from September 2017, monographs and periodicals published outside the publishing industry and university publications will no longer be indexed by people. This raises the question: What is the quality of the automatic indexing compared to the manual work or in other words to which degree can the automatic indexing replace people without a signi cant drop in regards to quality?
  5. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC test collections (2005) 0.01 
    0.013634706 = product of:
  0.06817353 = sum of:
    0.06817353 = weight(_text_:u in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06817353 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  6. Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval system evaluation (2005) 0.01 
    0.013634706 = product of:
  0.06817353 = sum of:
    0.06817353 = weight(_text_:u in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06817353 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  7. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC ad hoc experiments (2005) 0.01 
    0.013634706 = product of:
  0.06817353 = sum of:
    0.06817353 = weight(_text_:u in 5711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06817353 = score(doc=5711,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 5711, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5711)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  8. Robertson, S.; Callan, J.: Routing and filtering (2005) 0.01 
    0.013634706 = product of:
  0.06817353 = sum of:
    0.06817353 = weight(_text_:u in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06817353 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  9. Harman, D.K.: Beyond English (2005) 0.01 
    0.013634706 = product of:
  0.06817353 = sum of:
    0.06817353 = weight(_text_:u in 4850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06817353 = score(doc=4850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4850)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  10. Voorhees, E.M.; Garofolo, J.S.: Retrieving noisy text (2005) 0.01 
    0.013634706 = product of:
  0.06817353 = sum of:
    0.06817353 = weight(_text_:u in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06817353 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  11. Järvelin, K.: Evaluation (2011) 0.01 
    0.013634706 = product of:
  0.06817353 = sum of:
    0.06817353 = weight(_text_:u in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06817353 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Interactive information seeking, behaviour and retrieval. Eds.: Ruthven, I. u. D. Kelly
  12. Burnett, M.; Fisher, C.; Jones, R.: InTEXT precision indexing in TREC4 (1996) 0.01 
    0.011943938 = product of:
  0.05971969 = sum of:
    0.05971969 = weight(_text_:r in 7529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05971969 = score(doc=7529,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 7529, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7529)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. Kilgour, F.G.: Retrieval on information from computerized book texts (1989) 0.01 
    0.01168689 = product of:
  0.058434453 = sum of:
    0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 2965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058434453 = score(doc=2965,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 2965, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2965)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Academic librarianship past, present, and future. A festschrift in honor of David Kaser: Ed. by J. Richardson u. J.Y. Davis
  14. Voorhees, E.M.: Question answering in TREC (2005) 0.01 
    0.01168689 = product of:
  0.058434453 = sum of:
    0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 6487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058434453 = score(doc=6487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 6487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6487)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  15. Salton, G.; Lesk, M.E.: Computer evaluation of indexing and text processing (1968) 0.01 
    0.01168689 = product of:
  0.058434453 = sum of:
    0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058434453 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.60-84.
  16. Cleverdon, C.W.; Mills, J.: ¬The testing of index language devices (1963) 0.01 
    0.01168689 = product of:
  0.058434453 = sum of:
    0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058434453 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.98-110.
  17. Cooper, W.S.: ¬On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness, revisited (1973) 0.01 
    0.01168689 = product of:
  0.058434453 = sum of:
    0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058434453 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.191-204.
  18. Lancaster, F.W.: MEDLARS : report on the evaluation of its operating effiency (1961) 0.01 
    0.01168689 = product of:
  0.058434453 = sum of:
    0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 1931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058434453 = score(doc=1931,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1931, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1931)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.223-246.
  19. Sanderson, M.; Ruthven, I.: Report on the Glasgow IR group (glair4) submission (1997) 0.01 
    0.01168689 = product of:
  0.058434453 = sum of:
    0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 3088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058434453 = score(doc=3088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3088)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  20. Kelledy, L.; Smeaton, A.F.: TREC-5 experiments at Dublin City University : Query space reduction, Spanish & character shape encoding (1997) 0.01 
    0.01168689 = product of:
  0.058434453 = sum of:
    0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058434453 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 109
  • s 6
  • r 5
  • m 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications