-
Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007)
0.01
0.012583166 = product of:
0.025166333 = sum of:
0.025166333 = product of:
0.050332665 = sum of:
0.050332665 = weight(_text_:indexing in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050332665 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 157 - Classification and Indexing
-
Wolfram, D.; Olson, H.A.; Bloom, R.: Measuring consistency for multiple taggers using vector space modeling (2009)
0.01
0.012583166 = product of:
0.025166333 = sum of:
0.025166333 = product of:
0.050332665 = sum of:
0.050332665 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050332665 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A longstanding area of study in indexing is the identification of factors affecting vocabulary usage and consistency. This topic has seen a recent resurgence with a focus on social tagging. Tagging data for scholarly articles made available by the social bookmarking Website CiteULike (www.citeulike.org) were used to test the use of inter-indexer/tagger consistency density values, based on a method developed by the authors by comparing calculations for highly tagged documents representing three subject areas (Science, Social Science, Social Software). The analysis revealed that the developed method is viable for a large dataset. The findings also indicated that there were no significant differences in tagging consistency among the three topic areas, demonstrating that vocabulary usage in a relatively new subject area like social software is no more inconsistent than the more established subject areas investigated. The implications of the method used and the findings are discussed.
-
Konkova, E.; Göker, A.; Butterworth, R.; MacFarlane, A.: Social tagging: exploring the image, the tags, and the game (2014)
0.01
0.012583166 = product of:
0.025166333 = sum of:
0.025166333 = product of:
0.050332665 = sum of:
0.050332665 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050332665 = score(doc=1370,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 1370, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1370)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Large image collections on the Web need to be organized for effective retrieval. Metadata has a key role in image retrieval but rely on professionally assigned tags which is not a viable option. Current content-based image retrieval systems have not demonstrated sufficient utility on large-scale image sources on the web, and are usually used as a supplement to existing text-based image retrieval systems. We present two social tagging alternatives in the form of photo-sharing networks and image labeling games. Here we analyze these applications to evaluate their usefulness from the semantic point of view, investigating the management of social tagging for indexing. The findings of the study have shown that social tagging can generate a sizeable number of tags that can be classified as in terpretive for an image, and that tagging behaviour has a manageable and adjustable nature depending on tagging guidelines.
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.012410802 = product of:
0.024821604 = sum of:
0.024821604 = product of:
0.049643207 = sum of:
0.049643207 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049643207 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009)
0.01
0.011863522 = product of:
0.023727044 = sum of:
0.023727044 = product of:
0.04745409 = sum of:
0.04745409 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04745409 = score(doc=4203,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.23924173 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.01
0.010530914 = product of:
0.021061828 = sum of:
0.021061828 = product of:
0.042123657 = sum of:
0.042123657 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042123657 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.01
0.010530914 = product of:
0.021061828 = sum of:
0.021061828 = product of:
0.042123657 = sum of:
0.042123657 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042123657 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.01
0.010530914 = product of:
0.021061828 = sum of:
0.021061828 = product of:
0.042123657 = sum of:
0.042123657 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042123657 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hänger, C.: Knowledge management in the digital age : the possibilities of user generated content (2009)
0.01
0.010485971 = product of:
0.020971943 = sum of:
0.020971943 = product of:
0.041943885 = sum of:
0.041943885 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041943885 = score(doc=2813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Today, in times of Web 2.0., graduates and undergraduates interact in virtual communities like studiVZ (Studentenverzeichnis) and generate content by reviewing or tagging documents. This phenomenon offers good prospects for academic libraries. They can use the customers' tags for indexing the growing amount of electronic resources and thereby optimize the search for these documents. Important examples are the journals, databases and e-books included in the "Nationallizenzen" financed by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The documents in this collection are not manually indexed by librarians and have no annotation according to the German standard classification systems. Connecting search systems by means of Web-2.0.-services is an important task for libraries. For this purpose users are encouraged to tag printed and electronic resources in search systems like the libraries' online catalogs and to establish connections between entries in other systems, e.g. Bibsonomy, and the items found in the online catalog. As a consequence annotations chosen by both, users and librarians, will coexist: The items in the tagging systems and the online catalog are linked, library users may find other publications of interest, and contacts between library users with similar scientific interests may be established. Librarians have to face the fact that user generated tags do not necessarily have the same quality as their own annotations and will therefore have to seek for instruments for comparing user generated tags with library generated keywords.
-
Kipp, M.E.I.; Campbell, D.G.: Searching with tags : do tags help users find things? (2010)
0.01
0.010485971 = product of:
0.020971943 = sum of:
0.020971943 = product of:
0.041943885 = sum of:
0.041943885 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041943885 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The question of whether tags can be useful in the process of information retrieval was examined in this pilot study. Many tags are subject related and could work well as index terms or entry vocabulary; however, folksonomies also include relationships that are traditionally not included in controlled vocabularies including affective or time and task related tags and the user name of the tagger. Participants searched a social bookmarking tool, specialising in academic articles (CiteULike), and an online journal database (Pubmed) for articles relevant to a given information request. Screen capture software was used to collect participant actions and a semi-structured interview asked them to describe their search process. Preliminary results showed that participants did use tags in their search process, as a guide to searching and as hyperlinks to potentially useful articles. However, participants also used controlled vocabularies in the journal database to locate useful search terms and links to related articles supplied by Pubmed. Additionally, participants reported using user names of taggers and group names to help select resources by relevance. The inclusion of subjective and social information from the taggers is very different from the traditional objectivity of indexing and was reported as an asset by a number of participants. This study suggests that while users value social and subjective factors when searching, they also find utility in objective factors such as subject headings. Most importantly, users are interested in the ability of systems to connect them with related articles whether via subject access or other means.
-
Stvilia, B.; Jörgensen, C.: Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr (2010)
0.01
0.010485971 = product of:
0.020971943 = sum of:
0.020971943 = product of:
0.041943885 = sum of:
0.041943885 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041943885 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- To enable and guide effective metadata creation it is essential to understand the structure and patterns of the activities of the community around the photographs, resources used, and scale and quality of the socially created metadata relative to the metadata and knowledge already encoded in existing knowledge organization systems. This article presents an analysis of Flickr member discussions around the photographs of the Library of Congress photostream in Flickr. The article also reports on an analysis of the intrinsic and relational quality of the photostream tags relative to two knowledge organization systems: the Thesaurus for Graphic Materials (TGM) and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). Thirty seven percent of the original tag set and 15.3% of the preprocessed set (after the removal of tags with fewer than three characters and URLs) were invalid or misspelled terms. Nouns, named entity terms, and complex terms constituted approximately 77% of the preprocessed set. More than a half of the photostream tags were not found in the TGM and LCSH, and more than a quarter of those terms were regular nouns and noun phrases. This suggests that these terms could be complimentary to more traditional methods of indexing using controlled vocabularies.
-
Choi, Y.: ¬A Practical application of FRBR for organizing information in digital environments (2012)
0.01
0.010485971 = product of:
0.020971943 = sum of:
0.020971943 = product of:
0.041943885 = sum of:
0.041943885 = weight(_text_:indexing in 319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041943885 = score(doc=319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This paper is derived from the author's doctoral dissertation "Usefulness of Social Tagging in Organizing and Providing Access An Analysis of Indexing Consistency and Quality." The author is deeply grateful to her dissertation committee-Dr. Linda C. Smith chairperson, Drs. Allen Renear, Miles Efron and John Unsworth. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_4_a.pdf.
-
Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008)
0.01
0.008775762 = product of:
0.017551525 = sum of:
0.017551525 = product of:
0.03510305 = sum of:
0.03510305 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03510305 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.01
0.008775762 = product of:
0.017551525 = sum of:
0.017551525 = product of:
0.03510305 = sum of:
0.03510305 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03510305 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019)
0.01
0.008775762 = product of:
0.017551525 = sum of:
0.017551525 = product of:
0.03510305 = sum of:
0.03510305 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03510305 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008)
0.01
0.0070206095 = product of:
0.014041219 = sum of:
0.014041219 = product of:
0.028082438 = sum of:
0.028082438 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028082438 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.01
0.0070206095 = product of:
0.014041219 = sum of:
0.014041219 = product of:
0.028082438 = sum of:
0.028082438 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028082438 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008)
0.01
0.0070206095 = product of:
0.014041219 = sum of:
0.014041219 = product of:
0.028082438 = sum of:
0.028082438 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028082438 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2009 9:15:45
