Search (374 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.40
    0.39776927 = product of:
      0.63643086 = sum of:
        0.08744906 = product of:
          0.26234716 = sum of:
            0.26234716 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26234716 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.26234716 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26234716 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0154592255 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.26234716 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26234716 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  2. Auster, E.; Lawton, S.B.: ¬The negotiation process in on-line bibliographic retrieval (1979) 0.13
    0.13107225 = product of:
      0.34952602 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
        0.26488012 = sum of:
          0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035312846 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
          0.22956727 = weight(_text_:line in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22956727 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 4(1979) May, S.86-98
  3. Salton, G.; Waldstein, R.H.: Term relevance weights in on-line information retrieval (1978) 0.08
    0.08291881 = product of:
      0.33167523 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
        0.26488012 = sum of:
          0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035312846 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
          0.22956727 = weight(_text_:line in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22956727 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
  4. Oldroyd, B.K.; Citroen, C.L.: Study of strategies used in on-line searching (1977) 0.07
    0.07068273 = product of:
      0.2827309 = sum of:
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=5129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
        0.26488012 = sum of:
          0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035312846 = score(doc=5129,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
          0.22956727 = weight(_text_:line in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22956727 = score(doc=5129,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
  5. Jardine, N.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The use of hierarchic clustering in information retrieval (1971) 0.07
    0.0677851 = product of:
      0.18076026 = sum of:
        0.09446257 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09446257 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.06844692 = weight(_text_:use in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06844692 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5413059 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 7(1971), S.217-240
  6. Sparck Jones, K.; Jackson, D.M.: ¬The use of automatically obtained keyword classification for information retrieval (1970) 0.07
    0.0677851 = product of:
      0.18076026 = sum of:
        0.09446257 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09446257 = score(doc=5177,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
        0.06844692 = weight(_text_:use in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06844692 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5413059 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 5(1970), S.175-201
  7. Foskett, A.C.: ¬The subject approach : recent developments in indexing (1972) 0.06
    0.06168047 = product of:
      0.16448125 = sum of:
        0.07409597 = weight(_text_:use in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07409597 = score(doc=1205,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5859809 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
        0.027328307 = weight(_text_:of in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027328307 = score(doc=1205,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.42320424 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
        0.06305697 = product of:
          0.12611394 = sum of:
            0.12611394 = weight(_text_:computers in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12611394 = score(doc=1205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.58088124 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    The complexity explosion has led to ever-increasing difficulties in subject specification, especially in the use of notations in classified arrangement. Two recent developments, the use of DC18 and PRECIS in the BNB, form a substantial contribution towards the solution of these difficulties, particularly in view of the increased pressure for standardization arising from the use of computers
    Source
    Journal of librarianship. 4(1972), S.240-252
  8. Stokolova, N.A.: Syntactic tools and semantic power of information languages : Pt.2 of 'Elements of a semantic theory of information retrieval' (1976) 0.05
    0.0530257 = product of:
      0.1060514 = sum of:
        0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033397563 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
        0.029602163 = weight(_text_:of in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029602163 = score(doc=1888,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.458417 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Different kinds of syntactic tools of information languages (IL) in use, considered as meaning-distinguished tools, are described as simplified forms of some initial IL grammar tools called 'standard phrases' which are n-place relational predicates of a special kind. A quantitative evaluation is attempted of the effects which the idiosyncracies of the syntactic tools of IL's have on their semantic power
  9. Fugmann, R.: On the role of subjectivity in establishing, using, operating and evaluating information retrieval systems : treatise 2 on information retrieval theory (1973) 0.05
    0.052012175 = product of:
      0.13869913 = sum of:
        0.10123099 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10123099 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015619429 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.02184871 = product of:
          0.04369742 = sum of:
            0.04369742 = weight(_text_:on in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04369742 = score(doc=1673,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.48112202 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 9(1973), S.353-372
  10. Turski, W.M.: On a model of information retrieval system based on thesaurus (1971) 0.05
    0.051481236 = product of:
      0.1372833 = sum of:
        0.09446257 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09446257 = score(doc=3913,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=3913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
        0.024969954 = product of:
          0.049939908 = sum of:
            0.049939908 = weight(_text_:on in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049939908 = score(doc=3913,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.54985374 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 7(1971) no.2, S.89-94
  11. Artandi, S.: Document retrieval and the concept of sets (1971) 0.05
    0.051299527 = product of:
      0.13679874 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
        0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025244808 = score(doc=5458,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
        0.0447588 = product of:
          0.0895176 = sum of:
            0.0895176 = weight(_text_:22 in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0895176 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 22(1971) no.4, S.289-290
  12. Hafer, M.A.; Weiss, S.F.: Word segmentation by letter successor varieties (1974) 0.05
    0.049665157 = product of:
      0.09933031 = sum of:
        0.050615493 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050615493 = score(doc=4997,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.011044604 = weight(_text_:of in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011044604 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.007724685 = product of:
          0.01544937 = sum of:
            0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01544937 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a method for automatically segmenting words into their stems and affixes. The process uses certain statistical properties of corpus (successor and predecessor letter variety counts) to indicate where words should be divided. Consequently, this process is less reliant on human intervention than are other methods for automated stemming. The segmentation system is used to construct stem dictionariesfor documnet classification. Information retrieval experiments are then performed using documents and queries so classified. Results show not only that this method is capable of high quality word segmentation, but also that its use in information retrieval produce results that are at least as good as thosse obtained using the more traditional stemming process.
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 10(1974) H.11/12, S.371-385
  13. Fugmann, R.: ¬The theoretical foundation of the IDC-system : 6 postulates for information retrieval; treatise 1 on information retrieval theory (1972) 0.05
    0.048738666 = product of:
      0.12996978 = sum of:
        0.09446257 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09446257 = score(doc=1672,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=1672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
        0.017656423 = product of:
          0.035312846 = sum of:
            0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035312846 = score(doc=1672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
  14. Adamson, G.W.; Boreham, J.: ¬The use of an association measure based on character structure to identify semantically related pairs of words and document titles (1974) 0.05
    0.047997322 = product of:
      0.095994644 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.025901893 = weight(_text_:of in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025901893 = score(doc=398,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.010924355 = product of:
          0.02184871 = sum of:
            0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02184871 = score(doc=398,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    An automatic classification technique has been developed, based on the character structure of words. Dice's similarity coefficient is computed from the number of matching diagrams in pairs of character strings, and used to cluster sets of character strings. A sample of words from a chemical data base was chosen to contain certain stems derived from the names of chemical elements. They were successfully clusterd into groups of semantically related words. Each cluster is characterised by the root word from which all its members are derived. A second example of titles from Mathematical Reviews was clustered into well-defined classes, which compare favourably with the subject groupings of Mathematical Reviews
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 10(1974), S.253-260
  15. Frank, H,; Hilgers, R.; Meyer, I.: Documentation in a constructed language and man-machine communication (1977) 0.05
    0.04583888 = product of:
      0.09167776 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=2095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=2095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
        0.019129815 = weight(_text_:of in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019129815 = score(doc=2095,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
        0.013379549 = product of:
          0.026759097 = sum of:
            0.026759097 = weight(_text_:on in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026759097 = score(doc=2095,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Previously, documentation systems have suffered from the use of descriptors insufficiently keyed to colloquial language ot from the seemingly insoluble problem of automatically processing original texts. The aim is to combine interlinguistic cooperation in literature documentation with special conditions of non-numeric data processing, without having to develop a special standardised documentation language. In 1975 work began on abstracting some American and European journal articles on educational technology using the constructed language Esperanto. The resulting collection of abstracts is being used by the FEoLL Institut für Kybernetische Pädagogik, Paderborn, to develop a conversational system for the retrieval of answers and references
    Source
    Third European Congress on Information Systems and Networks: overcoming the language barrier, Luxembourg, 3-6 May 1977. Org. by the Commission of the European Communities
  16. Waller, W.G.; Kraft, D.H.: ¬A mathematical model of a weighted Boolean retrieval system (1979) 0.04
    0.043992955 = product of:
      0.11731455 = sum of:
        0.057846278 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057846278 = score(doc=5503,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=5503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
        0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025244808 = score(doc=5503,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    The use of weights to denote a query representation and/or the indexing of a document is analysed as a generalization of a Boolean retrieval system. Criteria are given for the functions used to evaluate the relevance of the records to a specific query, including self-consistency. Various mechnaisms suggested in the literature for evaluating the relevance of records with regard to a given query are tested and found to be less than satisfactory. A new approach is suggested to avoid some of the perils of a weighted Boolean retrieval system
  17. Kelley, J.H.: New demands for cross-disciplinary indexing (1970) 0.04
    0.042646326 = product of:
      0.11372354 = sum of:
        0.082654744 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082654744 = score(doc=1957,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
        0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015619429 = score(doc=1957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
        0.01544937 = product of:
          0.03089874 = sum of:
            0.03089874 = weight(_text_:on in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03089874 = score(doc=1957,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    The social impact of information retrieval, the information bazaar. 7th Ann. Natl. Coll. on Information Retrieval, 8.-9.5.1970
  18. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.04
    0.04246092 = product of:
      0.11322911 = sum of:
        0.058445733 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058445733 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015619429 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.039163947 = product of:
          0.078327894 = sum of:
            0.078327894 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078327894 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  19. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.04
    0.042281475 = product of:
      0.08456295 = sum of:
        0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033397563 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=5002,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0223794 = product of:
          0.0447588 = sum of:
            0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0447588 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Many retrievalexperiments are intended to discover ways of improving performance, taking the results obtained with some particular technique as a baseline. The fact that substantial alterations to a system often have little or no effect on particular collections is puzzling. This may be due to the initially poor seperation of relevant and non-relevant documents. The paper presents a procedure for characterizing this seperation for a collection, which can be used to show whether proposed modifications of the base system are likely to be useful.
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.3, S.251-257
  20. Radecki, T.: Mathematical model of information retrieval systems based on the concept of fuzzy thesaurus (1976) 0.04
    0.041136134 = product of:
      0.10969636 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=5478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5478)
        0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 5478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025244808 = score(doc=5478,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5478, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5478)
        0.017656423 = product of:
          0.035312846 = sum of:
            0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 5478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035312846 = score(doc=5478,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 5478, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5478)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    

Authors