-
Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020)
0.01
0.006165853 = product of:
0.012331706 = sum of:
0.012331706 = product of:
0.024663411 = sum of:
0.024663411 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024663411 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Qin, H.; Wang, H.; Johnson, A.: Understanding the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of new-generation engineering designers for effective knowledge management (2020)
0.01
0.006165853 = product of:
0.012331706 = sum of:
0.012331706 = product of:
0.024663411 = sum of:
0.024663411 = weight(_text_:22 in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024663411 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Palsdottir, A.: Data literacy and management of research data : a prerequisite for the sharing of research data (2021)
0.01
0.006165853 = product of:
0.012331706 = sum of:
0.012331706 = product of:
0.024663411 = sum of:
0.024663411 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024663411 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels (1985)
0.01
0.0056065232 = product of:
0.0112130465 = sum of:
0.0112130465 = product of:
0.022426093 = sum of:
0.022426093 = weight(_text_:k in 3639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022426093 = score(doc=3639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 3639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Very interesting experimental work was done by Douglas Foskett and other British classificationists during the fifteen-year period following the end of World War II. The research was effective in demonstrating that it was possible to make very sophisticated classification systems for virtually any subject-systems suitable for experts and for the general user needing a detailed subject classification. The success of these special systems led to consideration of the possibility of putting them together to form a new general classification system. To do such a thing would require a general, overall framework of some kind, since systems limited to a special subject are easier to construct because one does not have to worry about including all of the pertinent facets needed for a general system. Individual subject classifications do not automatically coalesce into a general pattern. For example, what is central to one special classification might be fringe in another or in several others. Fringe terminologies may not coincide in terms of logical relationships. Homographs and homonyms may not rear their ugly heads until attempts at merger are made. Foskett points out that even identifying a thing in terms of a noun or verb involves different assumptions in approach. For these and other reasons, it made sense to look for existing work in fields where the necessary framework already existed. Foskett found the rudiments of such a system in a number of writings, culminating in a logical system called "integrative levels" suggested by James K. Feibleman (q.v.). This system consists of a set of advancing conceptual levels relating to the apparent organization of nature. These levels are irreversible in that if one once reached a certain level there was no going back. Foskett points out that with higher levels and greater complexity in structure the analysis needed to establish valid levels becomes much more difficult, especially as Feibleman stipulates that a higher level must not be reducible to a lower one. (That is, one cannot put Humpty Dumpty together again.) Foskett is optimistic to the extent of suggesting that references from level to level be made upwards, with inductive reasoning, a system used by Derek Austin (q.v.) for making reference structures in PRECIS. Though the method of integrative levels so far has not been used successfully with the byproducts of human social behavior and thought, so much has been learned about these areas during the past twenty years that Foskett may yet be correct in his optimism. Foskett's name has Jong been associated with classification in the social sciences. As with many of the British classificationists included in this book, he has been a member of the Classification Research Group for about forty years. Like the others, he continues to contribute to the field.
-
Needham, R.M.; Sparck Jones, K.: Keywords and clumps (1985)
0.01
0.0056065232 = product of:
0.0112130465 = sum of:
0.0112130465 = product of:
0.022426093 = sum of:
0.022426093 = weight(_text_:k in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022426093 = score(doc=3645,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Borko, H.: Research in computer based classification systems (1985)
0.01
0.0056065232 = product of:
0.0112130465 = sum of:
0.0112130465 = product of:
0.022426093 = sum of:
0.022426093 = weight(_text_:k in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022426093 = score(doc=3647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The selection in this reader by R. M. Needham and K. Sparck Jones reports an early approach to automatic classification that was taken in England. The following selection reviews various approaches that were being pursued in the United States at about the same time. It then discusses a particular approach initiated in the early 1960s by Harold Borko, at that time Head of the Language Processing and Retrieval Research Staff at the System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California and, since 1966, a member of the faculty at the Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of California, Los Angeles. As was described earlier, there are two steps in automatic classification, the first being to identify pairs of terms that are similar by virtue of co-occurring as index terms in the same documents, and the second being to form equivalence classes of intersubstitutable terms. To compute similarities, Borko and his associates used a standard correlation formula; to derive classification categories, where Needham and Sparck Jones used clumping, the Borko team used the statistical technique of factor analysis. The fact that documents can be classified automatically, and in any number of ways, is worthy of passing notice. Worthy of serious attention would be a demonstra tion that a computer-based classification system was effective in the organization and retrieval of documents. One reason for the inclusion of the following selection in the reader is that it addresses the question of evaluation. To evaluate the effectiveness of their automatically derived classification, Borko and his team asked three questions. The first was Is the classification reliable? in other words, could the categories derived from one sample of texts be used to classify other texts? Reliability was assessed by a case-study comparison of the classes derived from three different samples of abstracts. The notso-surprising conclusion reached was that automatically derived classes were reliable only to the extent that the sample from which they were derived was representative of the total document collection. The second evaluation question asked whether the classification was reasonable, in the sense of adequately describing the content of the document collection. The answer was sought by comparing the automatically derived categories with categories in a related classification system that was manually constructed. Here the conclusion was that the automatic method yielded categories that fairly accurately reflected the major area of interest in the sample collection of texts; however, since there were only eleven such categories and they were quite broad, they could not be regarded as suitable for use in a university or any large general library. The third evaluation question asked whether automatic classification was accurate, in the sense of producing results similar to those obtainabie by human cIassifiers. When using human classification as a criterion, automatic classification was found to be 50 percent accurate.
-
Börner, K.; Chen, C.; Boyack, K.W.: Visualizing knowledge domains (2002)
0.01
0.0056065232 = product of:
0.0112130465 = sum of:
0.0112130465 = product of:
0.022426093 = sum of:
0.022426093 = weight(_text_:k in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022426093 = score(doc=4286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002)
0.01
0.0056065232 = product of:
0.0112130465 = sum of:
0.0112130465 = product of:
0.022426093 = sum of:
0.022426093 = weight(_text_:k in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022426093 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Richter, K.: Weimarer Schüler erobern Wissen (2007)
0.01
0.0056065232 = product of:
0.0112130465 = sum of:
0.0112130465 = product of:
0.022426093 = sum of:
0.022426093 = weight(_text_:k in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022426093 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.01
0.0056065232 = product of:
0.0112130465 = sum of:
0.0112130465 = product of:
0.022426093 = sum of:
0.022426093 = weight(_text_:k in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022426093 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hypén, K.; Mäkelä, E.: ¬An ideal model for an information system for fiction and its application : Kirjasampo and Semantic Web (2011)
0.01
0.0056065232 = product of:
0.0112130465 = sum of:
0.0112130465 = product of:
0.022426093 = sum of:
0.022426093 = weight(_text_:k in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022426093 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lammers, I.S.; Eijnatten, F.M. van: Improving the management of knowledge in an automation department of a Dutch bank : embarking on action research (1996)
0.01
0.005395121 = product of:
0.010790242 = sum of:
0.010790242 = product of:
0.021580484 = sum of:
0.021580484 = weight(_text_:22 in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021580484 = score(doc=906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
-
Yang, C.C.; Luk, J.: Automatic generation of English/Chinese thesaurus based on a parallel corpus in laws (2003)
0.01
0.005395121 = product of:
0.010790242 = sum of:
0.010790242 = product of:
0.021580484 = sum of:
0.021580484 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021580484 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.01
0.005395121 = product of:
0.010790242 = sum of:
0.010790242 = product of:
0.021580484 = sum of:
0.021580484 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021580484 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
-
Savelsberg, S.: Informationsgesellschaft - ein neues Paradigma für Bibliotheken : Ein Kolloquium in Brasilien (2005)
0.01
0.005395121 = product of:
0.010790242 = sum of:
0.010790242 = product of:
0.021580484 = sum of:
0.021580484 = weight(_text_:22 in 4769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021580484 = score(doc=4769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4769)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2005 20:46:16
-
Hill, J.S.: ¬The elephant in the catalog : cataloging animals you can't see or touch (1996)
0.01
0.005395121 = product of:
0.010790242 = sum of:
0.010790242 = product of:
0.021580484 = sum of:
0.021580484 = weight(_text_:22 in 5606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021580484 = score(doc=5606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2006 12:22:06
-
Wackerow, J.: ¬The Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) (2008)
0.01
0.005395121 = product of:
0.010790242 = sum of:
0.010790242 = product of:
0.021580484 = sum of:
0.021580484 = weight(_text_:22 in 2662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021580484 = score(doc=2662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Shaw, R.; Buckland, M.: Open identification and linking of the four Ws (2008)
0.01
0.005395121 = product of:
0.010790242 = sum of:
0.010790242 = product of:
0.021580484 = sum of:
0.021580484 = weight(_text_:22 in 2665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021580484 = score(doc=2665,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2665, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2665)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014)
0.01
0.005395121 = product of:
0.010790242 = sum of:
0.010790242 = product of:
0.021580484 = sum of:
0.021580484 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021580484 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Shah, T.A.; Gul, S.; Gaur, R.C.: Authors self-citation behaviour in the field of Library and Information Science (2015)
0.01
0.005395121 = product of:
0.010790242 = sum of:
0.010790242 = product of:
0.021580484 = sum of:
0.021580484 = weight(_text_:22 in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021580484 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045509085 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
