Search (3431 results, page 172 of 172)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Weber, A.: "HeiIFASTen" - Entschlacken mit Leistungsgewinn : Neue Möglichkeiten für Bibliothekskataloge durch den Einsatz von Suchmaschinentechnologie (2007) 0.00
    0.0019220213 = product of:
      0.0038440425 = sum of:
        0.0038440425 = product of:
          0.007688085 = sum of:
            0.007688085 = weight(_text_:h in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007688085 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.08234863 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.4, S.225
  2. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.00
    0.0019220213 = product of:
      0.0038440425 = sum of:
        0.0038440425 = product of:
          0.007688085 = sum of:
            0.007688085 = weight(_text_:h in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007688085 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.08234863 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Lischka, K.: Archiv statt Deponie : Die US-Congressbibliothek soll das digitale Kulturerbe sichern - das dürfte teuer und schwierig werden (2003) 0.00
    0.0016016845 = product of:
      0.003203369 = sum of:
        0.003203369 = product of:
          0.006406738 = sum of:
            0.006406738 = weight(_text_:h in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006406738 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Fast eine Million britische Schulkinder, Beamte und Journalisten haben im Jahr 1986 Informationen über ihr Land gesammelt. Sie trugen 250000 Ortsbeschreibungen zusammen, 50 000 Fotos, 25 000 Landkarten und eine nie quantifizierte Textmenge. Der Sender BBC wollte ein Dokument über den britischen Alltag jener Zeit für die Nachwelt schaffen. Etwa 2,5 Millionen Pfund kostete der Datenberg, der auf einer Videodisk gespeichert wurde. Die galt als unzerstörbar. War sie bis heute auch. Nur gab es 16 Jahre später im Jahr 2002 keinen Computer mehr, der das Material lesen kann. Denn der entsprechende BBC Micro-Rechner war schnell verschwunden, weil ein zu teurer Flop. Ähnlich könnte es dem digital vorliegenden, kulturellen Erbe der Menschheit ergehen, Das denkt zumindest die Mehrheit der US-Kongressabgeordneten. Sie haben der Kongressbibliothek für die Entwicklung eines Systems zur Sammlung und Katalogisierung digitaler Informationen 20 Millionen Dollar bewilligt. Weitere 75 Millionen könnten in den nächsten Jahren vom Staat dazukommen - wenn auch Sponsoren so viel Geld bringen. Halten die sich zurück, knausert auch der Staat beim "National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program" (NDIIPP). Deutsche Bibliothekare betrachten das Projekt mit gemischten Gefühlen. "Wir sehen neidisch, was in den USA mit Sponsoren möglich ist. Doch andererseits kann man den Erhalt des nationalen Kulturerbes nicht darauf gründen, dass in 50 Jahren noch Sponsoren dafür zu haben sind", erklärt Katrin Ansorge, Sprecherin der Deutschen Bibliothek (DDB). Die hat - noch - keinen gesetzlichen Sammelauftrag für digitale Dokumente, die nicht auf physischen Datenträgern wie CD-ROMs vorliegen. Doch Ansorge ist zuversichtlich, "dass der Bund das Gesetz noch in dieser Legislaturperiode anpasst". Bis dahin dürfte mehr Material verloren sein als beim Brand der Bibliothek von Alexandria. Nach einer Studie der US-Kongressbibliothek war die Hälfte des 1998 im Internet verfügbaren Materials 1999 wieder verschwunden. "Vieles davon war wichtiges, einzigartiges Material. das man nicht zurückholen kann, aber einst dringend suchen wird", sagt der Leiter der Kongressbibliothek, James H. Billington. Den hier wirkenden Widerspruch des Internets als Medium formuliert Franziska Nori, die wissenschaftliche Leiterin der Abteilung Digitalcraft am Frankfurter Museum für Angewandte Kunst (MAK): "Es ist kurzlebig, hat aber alle Bereiche unserer Gesellschaft einschneidend verändert." Einen kleinen Beitrag zur Archivierung digitalen Kunsthandwerks leistet das MAK mit seiner Sammlung Webdesign. Ausgewählte Seiten von Gestaltern, Agenturen, Onlinemagazinen und Angeboten für Kinder werden auf den Servern von Digitalcraft archiviert. Auch die DDB sammelt bestimmte Dokumente wie Onlinedissertationen, Habilitationen oder nur online verfügbare wissenschaftliche Magazine. Die vergleichsweise kleinen Projekte zeigen vor allem eines: Die Archivierung digitaler Dokumente ist teuer. Denn die Probleme sind komplexer und vor allem neuer als der am Papier nagende Säurefraß und die nötige systematische Katalogisierung gedruckter Werke. Die Probleme beginnen schon beim Sammeln. Die von privaten Stiftungen getragene US-Initiative "Internet Archive" speichert beispielsweise jeden Tag 400 Gigabyte an neuem Material. Ausgedruckt wären das mehr als 20 Buchregal-Kilometer. Um zusätzlichen Speicherplatz zu kaufen, gibt das "Internet Archive" jeden Monat etwa 40000 Euro aus. Die Wartung und vor allem die Katalogisierung des vorhandenen Bestands ist weit teurer. Dabei erfasst das "Internet Archive" nur alle zwei Monate komplett einen großen Ausschnitt des Webs. Mit Passworten geschützte Seiten bleiben ebenso außen vor wie Kommunikation in Chaträumen und E-Mails.
  4. Arlt, H.-J.; Prange, C.: Gut, dass wir gesprochen haben : Im Reformprozess von Organisationen kommt der Kommunikation eine Schlüsselrolle zu (2005) 0.00
    0.0016016845 = product of:
      0.003203369 = sum of:
        0.003203369 = product of:
          0.006406738 = sum of:
            0.006406738 = weight(_text_:h in 3322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006406738 = score(doc=3322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 3322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3322)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Hermes, H.-J.: AG "Bibliotheken" (AG-BIB) und AG Dezimalklassifikation (AG-DK) : Gemeinsame Tagung der AG-BIB und AG-DK (2005) 0.00
    0.0016016845 = product of:
      0.003203369 = sum of:
        0.003203369 = product of:
          0.006406738 = sum of:
            0.006406738 = weight(_text_:h in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006406738 = score(doc=3654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Oehlschläger, S.: Treffpunkt Standardisierung : Der Standardisierungsausschuss beim 94. Deutschen Bibliothekartag in Düsseldorf (2005) 0.00
    0.0016016845 = product of:
      0.003203369 = sum of:
        0.003203369 = product of:
          0.006406738 = sum of:
            0.006406738 = weight(_text_:h in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006406738 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 17(2005) H.2, S.40-42
  7. Smiraglia, R.P.: Curating and virtual shelves : an editorial (2006) 0.00
    0.0016016845 = product of:
      0.003203369 = sum of:
        0.003203369 = product of:
          0.006406738 = sum of:
            0.006406738 = weight(_text_:h in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006406738 = score(doc=409,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Librarianship incorporates the tools of knowledge organization as part of its role as cultural disseminator. Subject headings and classification were both intended by their 19`h century promulgators - perhaps most notably Dewey and Cutter - to facilitate learning by grouping materials of high quality together. We might call this enhanced serendipity if we think it happens by accident or act of fate, or we might call it curatorship if we realize the responsibility inherent in our social role. The cataloger's job always has been to place each work sensitively among other works related to it, and to make the relationships explicit to facilitate and even encourage selection (see Miksa 1983). Schallier (2004) reported on the use of classification in an online catalog to enhance just such a curatorial purpose. UDC classification codes were exploded into linguistic strings to allow users to search, not just for a given term, but for the terms that occur around it - that is, terms that are adjacent in the classification. These displays are used alongside LCSH to provide enhanced-serendipity for users. What caught my attention was the intention of the project (p. 271): UDC permits librarians to build virtual library shelves, where a document's subjects can be described in thematic categories rather than in detailed verbal terms. And: It is our experience that most end users are not familiar with large controlled vocabularies. UDC could be an answer to this, since its alphanumeric makeup could be used to build a tree structure of terms, which would guide end users in their searchers. There are other implications from this project, including background linkage from UDC codes that drive the "virtual shelves" to subject terms that drive the initial classification. Knowledge organization has consequences in both theory and application."
  8. Kaiser, M.; Lieder, H.J.; Majcen, K.; Vallant, H.: New ways of sharing and using authority information : the LEAF project (2003) 0.00
    0.0016016845 = product of:
      0.003203369 = sum of:
        0.003203369 = product of:
          0.006406738 = sum of:
            0.006406738 = weight(_text_:h in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006406738 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Zhang, J.; Mostafa, J.; Tripathy, H.: Information retrieval by semantic analysis and visualization of the concept space of D-Lib® magazine (2002) 0.00
    0.0016016845 = product of:
      0.003203369 = sum of:
        0.003203369 = product of:
          0.006406738 = sum of:
            0.006406738 = weight(_text_:h in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006406738 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Williamson, N.: Classification research issues (2004) 0.00
    0.0015855867 = product of:
      0.0031711734 = sum of:
        0.0031711734 = product of:
          0.006342347 = sum of:
            0.006342347 = weight(_text_:h in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006342347 = score(doc=3727,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.067934155 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Classification Research Group (CRG) While the CRG was saddened by the loss of Douglas Foskett, a keen mind and stalwart friend, in May 2004, the work an the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2) continues. The group meets an a fairly regular basis an the development of the tables, and meetings often include interesting discussions of the theory of classification in general and as understood in the context of CRG philosophy. At its 339,h meeting in February, discussion focused an the tables for Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, and an Veterinary Science. Among the details discussed were the possibility of parallels between human medicine and veterinary medicine and the acknowledgment of small animal practice. Specializations such as "zoo medicine" and "hedgehog hospitals" were identified. The logical place for "poaching" was discussed and conservation was deemed to go with ecology because of the intervention of humans. Discussions at the 340,h meeting continued with these same topics in more detail, concentrating an the details of the schedules an "livestock, domestic animals, farm animals." Later, the discussion moved an to "forestry, ecology, and environment."
  11. Jahns, Y.; Trummer, M.: Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung nach Maß : Kann Heterogenität beherrscht werden? (2004) 0.00
    0.0012813476 = product of:
      0.0025626952 = sum of:
        0.0025626952 = product of:
          0.0051253904 = sum of:
            0.0051253904 = weight(_text_:h in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051253904 = score(doc=2789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09336021 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03757783 = queryNorm
                0.05489909 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 16(2004) H.2, S.15-19

Types

  • el 71
  • b 32
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes