Search (3069 results, page 2 of 154)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Moore, A.: As I sit studying : WWW-based reference services (1998) 0.05
    0.05319354 = product of:
      0.10638708 = sum of:
        0.10638708 = sum of:
          0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713582 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
          0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049251262 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1998 22:10:42
  2. Crocetti, L.: AACR2 in edizione italiana (1997) 0.05
    0.05319354 = product of:
      0.10638708 = sum of:
        0.10638708 = sum of:
          0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713582 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
          0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049251262 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:22:48
    Location
    I
  3. Diaz, P.; Aedo, I.; Panetsos, F.: Labyrinth, an abstract model for hypermedia applications : Description of its static components (1997) 0.05
    0.05319354 = product of:
      0.10638708 = sum of:
        0.10638708 = sum of:
          0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 3318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713582 = score(doc=3318,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3318, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3318)
          0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049251262 = score(doc=3318,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3318, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information systems. 22(1997) no.8, S.447-464
  4. Murray, I.: Funding access to the Internet in public libraries : a review article (1998) 0.05
    0.05319354 = product of:
      0.10638708 = sum of:
        0.10638708 = sum of:
          0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 3529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713582 = score(doc=3529,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3529, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3529)
          0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049251262 = score(doc=3529,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3529, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3529)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 5.1999 19:48:22
  5. Dongbo, W.: ¬The Dewey Decimal Classification in China (1997) 0.05
    0.05319354 = product of:
      0.10638708 = sum of:
        0.10638708 = sum of:
          0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 6414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713582 = score(doc=6414,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 6414, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6414)
          0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 6414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049251262 = score(doc=6414,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6414, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6414)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Starting with a brief history of Chinese classification systems before the DDC was introduced into China, I shall discuss the impact and influence of the DDC upon Chinese librarianship in the past and in the future.' In addition, outlines of some influential library classifications are listed.
    Date
    29.12.2001 19:40:22
  6. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.05
    0.05319354 = product of:
      0.10638708 = sum of:
        0.10638708 = sum of:
          0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713582 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
          0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049251262 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.05
    0.05319354 = product of:
      0.10638708 = sum of:
        0.10638708 = sum of:
          0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713582 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049251262 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  8. McTavish, J.: Everyday life classification processes and technologies (2014) 0.05
    0.05319354 = product of:
      0.10638708 = sum of:
        0.10638708 = sum of:
          0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713582 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
          0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049251262 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To "classify" in Library and Information Sciences (LIS) usually involves an engagement with formally established classification systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification. In this research I suggest an alternative path for LIS scholars - one that considers the application of LIS theories about classification to the investigation of everyday life "classification" processes and technologies.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. Sonnenwald, D.H.: Evolving perspectives of human information behaviour : contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons (1999) 0.05
    0.04877007 = product of:
      0.09754014 = sum of:
        0.09754014 = sum of:
          0.060601693 = weight(_text_:i in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060601693 = score(doc=293,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=293,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an evolving framework for human information behaviour, including information exploration, seeking, filtering, use and dissemination. It is based on empirical studies of human information behaviour in a variety of settings (Iivonen & Sonnenwald, 1998; Sonnenwald, 1993, 1995, 1996) and theories from a variety of research traditions, including information science, communication, sociology and psychology that inform our understanding of human information behaviour. I begin formulating the framework by discussing fundamental concepts, such as context, situation and social networks. Building on these concepts, I propose a series of propositions that strive to elucidate the framework. Key ideas in the framework include the introduction of the role of social networks in information exploration, and the concept of an `information horizon' in which we can act to explore information.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:46:09
  10. He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009) 0.05
    0.04877007 = product of:
      0.09754014 = sum of:
        0.09754014 = sum of:
          0.060601693 = weight(_text_:i in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060601693 = score(doc=3122,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The consistent finding that internationally coauthored papers are more heavily cited has led to a tacit agreement among politicians and scientists that international collaboration in scientific research should be particularly promoted. However, existing studies of research collaboration suffer from a major weakness in that the Thomson Reuters Web of Science until recently did not link author names with affiliation addresses. The general approach has been to hierarchically code papers into international paper, national paper, or local paper based on the address information. This hierarchical coding scheme severely understates the level and contribution of local or national collaboration on an internationally coauthored paper. In this research, I code collaboration variables by hand checking each paper in the sample, use two measures of a paper's impact, and try several regression models. I find that both international collaboration and local collaboration are positively and significantly associated with a paper's impact, but international collaboration does not have more epistemic authority than local collaboration. This result suggests that previous findings based on hierarchical coding might be misleading.
    Date
    26. 9.2009 11:22:05
  11. Hetmanski, M.: ¬The actual role of metaphors in knowledge organization (2014) 0.05
    0.04877007 = product of:
      0.09754014 = sum of:
        0.09754014 = sum of:
          0.060601693 = weight(_text_:i in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060601693 = score(doc=1406,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the paper I argue that metaphors widely used in presenting knowledge organization, despite of their methodological correctness, play an ambiguous role. They are mostly conceived and used as models of information/knowledge organization such as library documents, databases and internet tools and devices. But due to their suggestive power and pervasive role, they can also obscure the structure of such organization. One can expect explanatory (descriptive) benefits from spatial (e.g. terrestrial or aquatic) metaphors comparing modes of organizing and accessing knowledge to oceans, pathways networks or even rhizomes. But mapping or metaphorically presenting cognitive undertakings such as searching, browsing or retrieving information/knowledge can obscure their actual essence. As held by the cognitive theory of metaphor (Lakoff, Johnson, Ritchie), certain aspects of complex phenomena (i.e. knowledge organization) are repeatedly obscured and hidden. I argue that metaphors containing probability concepts, although not immediately intuitive or comprehensible, are more fruitful effective in mapping knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Hori, I.: ¬The cognitive structure of classification work (1989) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 3553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=3553,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 3553, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3553)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 3553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=3553,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3553, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:12:09
  13. Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:51
  14. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  15. Skladalova, J.; Perlin, C.; Hoch, I.: Progress in computerization : activities in the Czech Republic (1997) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=3012,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 3012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=3012,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3012, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3012)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 12:58:36
  16. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Historical aspects of cataloging and classification; Part I
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
  17. Frohnsdorff, G.: Facts? of publication : cataloging problems posed by deceptive information (1999) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    False imprint information and other deceptive publication details present problems for catalogers. In this article, I describe different types of misleading information, including fictitions names of publishers, incorrect places of publication, and false dates; mention possible reasons for deception, including fear of prosecution, and emphasize the need for catalogers to be suspicious when handling certain types of material. Erotic printed materials and bootleg sound recordings are discussed in detail, and examples of misleading information in each medium and explanations of how cataloging rules address or fail to address specific circumstances are included. Catalogers need to be aware of both the potential problems associated with certain types of materials and the types of reference sources to consult when dealing with those materials.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Rowlands, I.; Bawden, D.: Building the digital library on solid research foundations (1999) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 1.2007 12:03:22
  20. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 3.2007 19:55:22
    Source
    Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven

Authors

Years

Types

  • el 81
  • b 31
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes