-
Van de Sompel, H.; Hochstenbach, P.: Reference linking in a hybrid library environment : part 1: frameworks for linking (1999)
0.00
0.0025912772 = product of:
0.0051825545 = sum of:
0.0051825545 = product of:
0.010365109 = sum of:
0.010365109 = weight(_text_:d in 1244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010365109 = score(doc=1244,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.118742 = fieldWeight in 1244, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The creation of services linking related information entities is an area that is attracting an ever increasing interest in the ongoing development of the World Wide Web in general, and of research-related information systems in particular. Currently, both practice and theory point at linking services as being a major domain for innovation enabled by digital communication of content. Publishers, subscription agents, researchers and libraries are all looking into ways to create added value by linking related information entities, as such presenting the information within a broader context estimated to be relevant to the users of the information. This is the first of two articles in D-Lib Magazine on this topic. This first part describes the current state-of-the-art and contrasts various approaches to the problem. It identifies static and dynamic linking solutions as well as open and closed linking frameworks. It also includes an extensive bibliography. The second part, SFX, a Generic Linking Solution describes a system that we have developed for linking in a hybrid working environment. The creation of services linking related information entities is an area that is attracting an ever increasing interest in the ongoing development of the World Wide Web in general, and of research-related information systems in particular. Although most writings on electronic scientific communication have touted other benefits, such as the increase in communication speed, the possibility to exchange multimedia content and the absence of limitations on the length of research papers, currently both practice and theory point at linking services as being a major opportunity for improved communication of content. Publishers, subscription agents, researchers and libraries are all looking into ways to create added-value by linking related information entities, as such presenting the information within a broader context estimated to be relevant to the users of the information.
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.4, xx S
-
Fife, E.D.; Husch, L.: ¬The Mathematics Archives : making mathematics easy to find on the Web (1999)
0.00
0.002290387 = product of:
0.004580774 = sum of:
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009161548 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.3, xx S
-
Van de Sompel, H.; Hochstenbach, P.: Reference linking in a hybrid library environment : part 2: SFX, a generic linking solution (1999)
0.00
0.002290387 = product of:
0.004580774 = sum of:
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 1241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009161548 = score(doc=1241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.4, xx S
-
Oard, D.W.: Serving users in many languages : cross-language information retrieval for digital libraries (1997)
0.00
0.002290387 = product of:
0.004580774 = sum of:
0.004580774 = product of:
0.009161548 = sum of:
0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 1261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009161548 = score(doc=1261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 3(1997) no.12, xx S
-
Spink, A.; Wilson, T.; Ellis, D.; Ford, N.: Modeling users' successive searches in digital environments : a National Science Foundation/British Library funded study (1998)
0.00
0.0022673677 = product of:
0.0045347353 = sum of:
0.0045347353 = product of:
0.009069471 = sum of:
0.009069471 = weight(_text_:d in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009069471 = score(doc=1255,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.10389925 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 4(1998) no.4, xx S
-
Baker, T.: Languages for Dublin Core (1998)
0.00
0.0022673677 = product of:
0.0045347353 = sum of:
0.0045347353 = product of:
0.009069471 = sum of:
0.009069471 = weight(_text_:d in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009069471 = score(doc=1257,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.10389925 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Over the past three years, the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative has achieved a broad international consensus on the semantics of a simple element set for describing electronic resources. Since the first workshop in March 1995, which was reported in the very first issue of D-Lib Magazine, Dublin Core has been the topic of perhaps a dozen articles here. Originally intended to be simple and intuitive enough for authors to tag Web pages without special training, Dublin Core is being adapted now for more specialized uses, from government information and legal deposit to museum informatics and electronic commerce. To meet such specialized requirements, Dublin Core can be customized with additional elements or qualifiers. However, these refinements can compromise interoperability across applications. There are tradeoffs between using specific terms that precisely meet local needs versus general terms that are understood more widely. We can better understand this inevitable tension between simplicity and complexity if we recognize that metadata is a form of human language. With Dublin Core, as with a natural language, people are inclined to stretch definitions, make general terms more specific, specific terms more general, misunderstand intended meanings, and coin new terms. One goal of this paper, therefore, will be to examine the experience of some related ways to seek semantic interoperability through simplicity: planned languages, interlingua constructs, and pidgins. The problem of semantic interoperability is compounded when we consider Dublin Core in translation. All of the workshops, documents, mailing lists, user guides, and working group outputs of the Dublin Core Initiative have been in English. But in many countries and for many applications, people need a metadata standard in their own language. In principle, the broad elements of Dublin Core can be defined equally well in Bulgarian or Hindi. Since Dublin Core is a controlled standard, however, any parallel definitions need to be kept in sync as the standard evolves. Another goal of the paper, then, will be to define the conceptual and organizational problem of maintaining a metadata standard in multiple languages. In addition to a name and definition, which are meant for human consumption, each Dublin Core element has a label, or indexing token, meant for harvesting by search engines. For practical reasons, these machine-readable tokens are English-looking strings such as Creator and Subject (just as HTML tags are called HEAD, BODY, or TITLE). These tokens, which are shared by Dublin Cores in every language, ensure that metadata fields created in any particular language are indexed together across repositories. As symbols of underlying universal semantics, these tokens form the basis of semantic interoperability among the multiple Dublin Cores. As long as we limit ourselves to sharing these indexing tokens among exact translations of a simple set of fifteen broad elements, the definitions of which fit easily onto two pages, the problem of Dublin Core in multiple languages is straightforward. But nothing having to do with human language is ever so simple. Just as speakers of various languages must learn the language of Dublin Core in their own tongues, we must find the right words to talk about a metadata language that is expressable in many discipline-specific jargons and natural languages and that inevitably will evolve and change over time.
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 4(1998) no.12, xx S
-
Borgman, C.L.: Multi-media, multi-cultural, and multi-lingual digital libraries : or how do we exchange data In 400 languages? (1997)
0.00
0.0022673677 = product of:
0.0045347353 = sum of:
0.0045347353 = product of:
0.009069471 = sum of:
0.009069471 = weight(_text_:d in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009069471 = score(doc=1263,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.10389925 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Internet would not be very useful if communication were limited to textual exchanges between speakers of English located in the United States. Rather, its value lies in its ability to enable people from multiple nations, speaking multiple languages, to employ multiple media in interacting with each other. While computer networks broke through national boundaries long ago, they remain much more effective for textual communication than for exchanges of sound, images, or mixed media -- and more effective for communication in English than for exchanges in most other languages, much less interactions involving multiple languages. Supporting searching and display in multiple languages is an increasingly important issue for all digital libraries accessible on the Internet. Even if a digital library contains materials in only one language, the content needs to be searchable and displayable on computers in countries speaking other languages. We need to exchange data between digital libraries, whether in a single language or in multiple languages. Data exchanges may be large batch updates or interactive hyperlinks. In any of these cases, character sets must be represented in a consistent manner if exchanges are to succeed. Issues of interoperability, portability, and data exchange related to multi-lingual character sets have received surprisingly little attention in the digital library community or in discussions of standards for information infrastructure, except in Europe. The landmark collection of papers on Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure, for example, contains no discussion of multi-lingual issues except for a passing reference to the Unicode standard. The goal of this short essay is to draw attention to the multi-lingual issues involved in designing digital libraries accessible on the Internet. Many of the multi-lingual design issues parallel those of multi-media digital libraries, a topic more familiar to most readers of D-Lib Magazine. This essay draws examples from multi-media DLs to illustrate some of the urgent design challenges in creating a globally distributed network serving people who speak many languages other than English. First we introduce some general issues of medium, culture, and language, then discuss the design challenges in the transition from local to global systems, lastly addressing technical matters. The technical issues involve the choice of character sets to represent languages, similar to the choices made in representing images or sound. However, the scale of the language problem is far greater. Standards for multi-media representation are being adopted fairly rapidly, in parallel with the availability of multi-media content in electronic form. By contrast, we have hundreds (and sometimes thousands) of years worth of textual materials in hundreds of languages, created long before data encoding standards existed. Textual content from past and present is being encoded in language and application-specific representations that are difficult to exchange without losing data -- if they exchange at all. We illustrate the multi-language DL challenge with examples drawn from the research library community, which typically handles collections of materials in 400 or so languages. These are problems faced not only by developers of digital libraries, but by those who develop and manage any communication technology that crosses national or linguistic boundaries.
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 3(1997) no.6, xx S
-
Dolin, R.; Agrawal, D.; El Abbadi, A.; Pearlman, J.: Using automated classification for summarizing and selecting heterogeneous information sources (1998)
0.00
0.001943458 = product of:
0.003886916 = sum of:
0.003886916 = product of:
0.007773832 = sum of:
0.007773832 = weight(_text_:d in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007773832 = score(doc=1253,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.0890565 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 4(1998) no.1, xx S
-
Lynch, C.A.: ¬The Z39.50 information retrieval standard : part I: a strategic view of its past, present and future (1997)
0.00
0.001943458 = product of:
0.003886916 = sum of:
0.003886916 = product of:
0.007773832 = sum of:
0.007773832 = weight(_text_:d in 1262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007773832 = score(doc=1262,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.0890565 = fieldWeight in 1262, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper, which will appear in two parts, starting with this issue of D-Lib, looks at several strategic issues surrounding Z39.50. After a relatively brief overview of the function and history of the protocol, I will examine some of the competing visions of the protocol's role, with emphasis on issues of interoperability and the incorporation of semantics. The second installment of the paper will look at questions related to the management of the standard and the standards development process, with emphasis on the scope of the protocol and how that relates back again to interoperability questions. The paper concludes with a discussion of the adoption and deployment of the standard, its relationship to other standards, and some speculations on future directions for the protocol. This paper is not intended to be a tutorial on the details of how current or past versions of Z39.50 work. These technical details are covered not only in the standard itself (which can admittedly be rather difficult reading) but also in an array of tutorial and review papers (see <http://lcweb.loc.gov/z3950/agency> for bibliographies and pointers to on-line information on Z39.50). Instead, the paper's focus is on how and why Z39.50 developed the way it did, and the conceptual debates that have influenced its evolution and use. While a detailed technical knowledge of the operation of Z39.50 is certainly helpful, it should not be necessary in order to follow most of the material here. Some disclaimers are in order. I have been actively involved in the development of Z39.50 since the early 1980s and have been a participant -- and on occasion, even an instigator -- of some of the activities described here. This paper is an attempt to make a critical assessment of the current state of Z39.50 and a review of its development with the full benefit of hindsight. It recounts a number of debates that occurred within the developer community over the past years. In many of these, I advocated specific positions or approaches, sometimes successfully and sometimes unsuccessfully. What is presented here is one person's perspective - mine --, which is sometimes at odds with the current consensus with the developer community; I've tried to represent opposing views fairly, and to differentiate my opinions from fact or consensus. However, others will undoubtedly disagree with many of the comments here.
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 3(1997) no.4, xx S
-
Hill, L.L.; Frew, J.; Zheng, Q.: Geographic names : the implementation of a gazetteer in a georeferenced digital library (1999)
0.00
0.0018323096 = product of:
0.0036646193 = sum of:
0.0036646193 = product of:
0.0073292386 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073292386 = score(doc=1240,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1240, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1240)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.1, xx S
-
Van de Sompel, H.; Hochstenbach, P.: Reference linking in a hybrid library environment : part 3: generalizing the SFX solution in the "SFX@Ghent & SFX@LANL" experiment (1999)
0.00
0.0018323096 = product of:
0.0036646193 = sum of:
0.0036646193 = product of:
0.0073292386 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073292386 = score(doc=1243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1243)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.10, xx S
-
Paskin, N.: DOI: current status and outlook (1999)
0.00
0.0018323096 = product of:
0.0036646193 = sum of:
0.0036646193 = product of:
0.0073292386 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073292386 = score(doc=1245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.5, xx S
-
Atkins, H.: ¬The ISI® Web of Science® - links and electronic journals : how links work today in the Web of Science, and the challenges posed by electronic journals (1999)
0.00
0.0018323096 = product of:
0.0036646193 = sum of:
0.0036646193 = product of:
0.0073292386 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073292386 = score(doc=1246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1246)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.9, xx S
-
Payette, S.; Blanchi, C.; Lagoze, C.; Overly, E.A.: Interoperability for digital objects and repositories : the Cornell/CNRI experiments (1999)
0.00
0.0018323096 = product of:
0.0036646193 = sum of:
0.0036646193 = product of:
0.0073292386 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073292386 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 5(1999) no.5, xx S
-
Roszkowski, M.; Lukas, C.: ¬A distributed architecture for resource discovery using metadata (1998)
0.00
0.0018323096 = product of:
0.0036646193 = sum of:
0.0036646193 = product of:
0.0073292386 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073292386 = score(doc=1256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 4(1998) no.6, xx S
-
Arms, W.Y.; Blanchi, C.; Overly, E.A.: ¬An architecture for information in digital libraries (1997)
0.00
0.0016032709 = product of:
0.0032065418 = sum of:
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = weight(_text_:d in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064130835 = score(doc=1260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 3(1997) no.2, xx S
-
Daniel Jr., R.; Lagoze, C.: Extending the Warwick framework : from metadata containers to active digital objects (1997)
0.00
0.0016032709 = product of:
0.0032065418 = sum of:
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = weight(_text_:d in 1264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064130835 = score(doc=1264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 1264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 3(1997) no.11, xx S
-
ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997)
0.00
0.0016032709 = product of:
0.0032065418 = sum of:
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = weight(_text_:d in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064130835 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
