-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.03
0.025516426 = product of:
0.059538327 = sum of:
0.035108197 = weight(_text_:u in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035108197 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.004353387 = weight(_text_:a in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004353387 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.020076746 = product of:
0.040153492 = sum of:
0.040153492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040153492 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
- Theme
- Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
-
Gulbrandsen, A.D.; Heggø, D.M.O.; Knutsen, U.; Seland, G.: Towards a general Norwegian thesaurus? : Subproject Methodology for mapping Humord to WebDewey (2015)
0.02
0.024862168 = product of:
0.058011726 = sum of:
0.028870367 = weight(_text_:g in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028870367 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
0.021942623 = weight(_text_:u in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021942623 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
0.0071987375 = weight(_text_:a in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071987375 = score(doc=1827,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The one-year pilot project Methodology for mapping Humord to WebDewey at the University of Oslo Library (henceforth abbreviated UiO Library) was a sub-project of the larger project Towards a general Norwegian thesaurus? The results of the project were reported to the National Library of Norway in March. The project has received new funding and is prolonged as the two-year project Mapping to Norwegian WebDewey. The present document provides a presentation of the mapping project at the UiO Library, at the point when we closed the pilot and continued our efforts in the prolonged project. The paper is largely a translation of the pilot project report as per March 1st 2015, enriched with some updates and comments. It is indeed an intellectual work in progress, so the discussions, opinions and solutions presented below are under constant debate and review in our project group. This "state of the art" description of our challenges in mapping a thesaurus to WebDewey is intended as a starting point for our joint discussions at the EDUG seminar in Naples.
-
Braaksma, B.; Drewes, K.; Siemens, G.; Tittenberger, P.: Building a virtual learning commons : what do YOU want to do? (2007)
0.02
0.024449361 = product of:
0.05704851 = sum of:
0.015873993 = product of:
0.031747986 = sum of:
0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031747986 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464444 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006530081 = score(doc=702,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In 2006 the University of Manitoba's (UM) Libraries and Learning Technologies Centre collaborated to create an online tutorial to support the development of international students' information literacy skills. The International Student project addressed the unique needs of foreign students by using a broad spectrum definition of information literacy, which includes supporting development of social and cultural skills as well as information-seeking ones. In addition to informational content, the developers incorporated Web 2.0 functionality to enable students to interact outside of the classroom. The final product was placed in the university's new Virtual Learning Commons, a webspace designed to be a central location for online learning and discussion.
-
Guizzardi, G.; Guarino, N.: Semantics, ontology and explanation (2023)
0.02
0.02407442 = product of:
0.056173645 = sum of:
0.015873993 = product of:
0.031747986 = sum of:
0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031747986 = score(doc=976,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464444 = score(doc=976,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
0.005655216 = weight(_text_:a in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005655216 = score(doc=976,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The terms 'semantics' and 'ontology' are increasingly appearing together with 'explanation', not only in the scientific literature, but also in organizational communication. However, all of these terms are also being significantly overloaded. In this paper, we discuss their strong relation under particular interpretations. Specifically, we discuss a notion of explanation termed ontological unpacking, which aims at explaining symbolic domain descriptions (conceptual models, knowledge graphs, logical specifications) by revealing their ontological commitment in terms of their assumed truthmakers, i.e., the entities in one's ontology that make the propositions in those descriptions true. To illustrate this idea, we employ an ontological theory of relations to explain (by revealing the hidden semantics of) a very simple symbolic model encoded in the standard modeling language UML. We also discuss the essential role played by ontology-driven conceptual models (resulting from this form of explanation processes) in properly supporting semantic interoperability tasks. Finally, we discuss the relation between ontological unpacking and other forms of explanation in philosophy and science, as well as in the area of Artificial Intelligence.
- Type
- a
p
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.02
0.023959395 = product of:
0.055905253 = sum of:
0.030719671 = weight(_text_:u in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030719671 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076184273 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.017567152 = product of:
0.035134304 = sum of:
0.035134304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035134304 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
- Type
- a
-
Brown, T.B.; Mann, B.; Ryder, N.; Subbiah, M.; Kaplan, J.; Dhariwal, P.; Neelakantan, A.; Shyam, P.; Sastry, G.; Askell, A.; Agarwal, S.; Herbert-Voss, A.; Krueger, G.; Henighan, T.; Child, R.; Ramesh, A.; Ziegler, D.M.; Wu, J.; Winter, C.; Hesse, C.; Chen, M.; Sigler, E.; Litwin, M.; Gray, S.; Chess, B.; Clark, J.; Berner, C.; McCandlish, S.; Radford, A.; Sutskever, I.; Amodei, D.: Language models are few-shot learners (2020)
0.02
0.023644082 = product of:
0.055169523 = sum of:
0.014966144 = product of:
0.029932288 = sum of:
0.029932288 = weight(_text_:p in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029932288 = score(doc=872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03266309 = weight(_text_:g in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03266309 = score(doc=872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23474671 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
0.007540288 = weight(_text_:a in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007540288 = score(doc=872,freq=24.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time, we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding and of GPT-3 in general.
- Type
- a
-
Landry, P.; Zumer, M.; Clavel-Merrin, G.: Report on cross-language subject access options (2006)
0.02
0.02362967 = product of:
0.055135895 = sum of:
0.015873993 = product of:
0.031747986 = sum of:
0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031747986 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464444 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
0.0046174643 = weight(_text_:a in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046174643 = score(doc=2433,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This report presents the results of desk-top based study of projects and initiatives in the area of linking and mapping subject tools. While its goal is to provide areas of further study for cross-language subject access in the European Library, and specifically the national libraries of the Ten New Member States, it is not restricted to cross-language mappings since some of the tools used to create links across thesauri or subject headings in the same language may also be appropriate for cross-language mapping. Tools reviewed have been selected to represent a variety of approaches (e.g. subject heading to subject heading, thesaurus to thesaurus, classification to subject heading) reflecting the variety of subject access tools in use in the European Library. The results show that there is no single solution that would be appropriate for all libraries but that parts of several initiatives may be applicable on a technical, organisational or content level.
-
Rowlands, I.: Google generation : issues in information literacy
0.02
0.02273509 = product of:
0.053048544 = sum of:
0.018519659 = product of:
0.037039317 = sum of:
0.037039317 = weight(_text_:p in 1945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037039317 = score(doc=1945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 1945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.030719671 = weight(_text_:u in 1945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030719671 = score(doc=1945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1945)
0.0038092136 = weight(_text_:a in 1945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0038092136 = score(doc=1945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1945)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Ian Rowlands, senior lecturer at SLAIS, UCL, and a member of its CIBER research group is the author of the recently published report on searching behaviour of the 'Google generation', commissioned by JISC and the British Library. Ian focused on the issues from the perspective of the user and presented some findings related to the users' information behaviour that disperse the myth of so called 'Google generation'.
- Content
- Presentation at ISKO meeting on June 26, 2008 at University College, London. - Vgl. auch: Rowlands, I., D. Nicholas u. P. Williams u.a.: The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. In: Aslib proceedings. 60(2008) no.4, S.290-310.
-
Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011)
0.02
0.022234725 = product of:
0.051881023 = sum of:
0.018519659 = product of:
0.037039317 = sum of:
0.037039317 = weight(_text_:p in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037039317 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008517661 = weight(_text_:a in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008517661 = score(doc=3450,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
0.024843706 = product of:
0.04968741 = sum of:
0.04968741 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04968741 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The design and architecture of MIaS (Math Indexer and Searcher), a system for mathematics retrieval is presented, and design decisions are discussed. We argue for an approach based on Presentation MathML using a similarity of math subformulae. The system was implemented as a math-aware search engine based on the state-ofthe-art system Apache Lucene. Scalability issues were checked against more than 400,000 arXiv documents with 158 million mathematical formulae. Almost three billion MathML subformulae were indexed using a Solr-compatible Lucene.
- Content
- Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
- Date
- 22. 2.2017 13:00:42
- Type
- a
-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.02
0.022163 = product of:
0.051713668 = sum of:
0.026331145 = weight(_text_:u in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026331145 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.010324964 = weight(_text_:a in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010324964 = score(doc=2655,freq=20.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24171482 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.015057558 = product of:
0.030115116 = sum of:
0.030115116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030115116 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
- Type
- a
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax (2004)
0.02
0.021515496 = product of:
0.050202824 = sum of:
0.015873993 = product of:
0.031747986 = sum of:
0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 4683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031747986 = score(doc=4683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 4683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4683)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.026331145 = weight(_text_:u in 4683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026331145 = score(doc=4683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4683)
0.007997682 = weight(_text_:a in 4683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007997682 = score(doc=4683,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4683, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4683)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This description of OWL, the Web Ontology Language being designed by the W3C Web Ontology Working Group, contains a high-level abstract syntax for both OWL DL and OWL Lite, sublanguages of OWL. A model-theoretic semantics is given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies written in this abstract syntax. A model-theoretic semantics in the form of an extension to the RDF semantics is also given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies as RDF graphs (OWL Full). A mapping from the abstract syntax to RDF graphs is given and the two model theories are shown to have the same consequences on OWL ontologies that can be written in the abstract syntax.
- Editor
- Patel-Schneider, P.F., P. Hayes u . I. Horrocks
-
Wang, Y.-H.; Jhuo, P.-S.: ¬A semantic faceted search with rule-based inference (2009)
0.02
0.021216854 = product of:
0.049505994 = sum of:
0.015873993 = product of:
0.031747986 = sum of:
0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031747986 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.026331145 = weight(_text_:u in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026331145 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
0.007300853 = weight(_text_:a in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007300853 = score(doc=540,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Semantic Search has become an active research of Semantic Web in recent years. The classification methodology plays a pretty critical role in the beginning of search process to disambiguate irrelevant information. However, the applications related to Folksonomy suffer from many obstacles. This study attempts to eliminate the problems resulted from Folksonomy using existing semantic technology. We also focus on how to effectively integrate heterogeneous ontologies over the Internet to acquire the integrity of domain knowledge. A faceted logic layer is abstracted in order to strengthen category framework and organize existing available ontologies according to a series of steps based on the methodology of faceted classification and ontology construction. The result showed that our approach can facilitate the integration of inconsistent or even heterogeneous ontologies. This paper also generalizes the principles of picking appropriate facets with which our facet browser completely complies so that better semantic search result can be obtained.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Wongthontham, P.; Abu-Salih, B.: Ontology-based approach for semantic data extraction from social big data : state-of-the-art and research directions (2018)
0.02
0.021216854 = product of:
0.049505994 = sum of:
0.015873993 = product of:
0.031747986 = sum of:
0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031747986 = score(doc=4097,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.026331145 = weight(_text_:u in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026331145 = score(doc=4097,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
0.007300853 = weight(_text_:a in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007300853 = score(doc=4097,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- A challenge of managing and extracting useful knowledge from social media data sources has attracted much attention from academic and industry. To address this challenge, semantic analysis of textual data is focused in this paper. We propose an ontology-based approach to extract semantics of textual data and define the domain of data. In other words, we semantically analyse the social data at two levels i.e. the entity level and the domain level. We have chosen Twitter as a social channel challenge for a purpose of concept proof. Domain knowledge is captured in ontologies which are then used to enrich the semantics of tweets provided with specific semantic conceptual representation of entities that appear in the tweets. Case studies are used to demonstrate this approach. We experiment and evaluate our proposed approach with a public dataset collected from Twitter and from the politics domain. The ontology-based approach leverages entity extraction and concept mappings in terms of quantity and accuracy of concept identification.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Misra, G.; Prakash, A.: Kenneth J. Gergen and social constructionism : Editorial (2012)
0.02
0.020649744 = product of:
0.048182737 = sum of:
0.013228328 = product of:
0.026456656 = sum of:
0.026456656 = weight(_text_:p in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026456656 = score(doc=742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.028870367 = weight(_text_:g in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028870367 = score(doc=742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
0.0060840435 = weight(_text_:a in 742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060840435 = score(doc=742,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 742, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=742)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Going beyond the insular orientation of psychology, Ken has often been crossing the disciplinary boundaries to create bridges and searching for shared spaces to foster dialogue. Building on developments in contemporary discourses in the philosophy of science, cultural studies, and interpretive inquiry, Ken has widened the net of psychological exploration and situated it in a culturally informed dynamic intellectual space. He has critically addressed many concepts and assumptions that are taken for granted by those who are educated in the positivist mould of knowledge creation, which has been informing the mainstream psychological investigations. The constructionist turn has been controversial. It has met with resistance and contested by those who, like physical scientists, subscribe to an essentialist view of reality and claim legitimacy for the scientifically produced and represented 'objective' knowledge. Positioned in such a scenario, Ken has indefatigably tried to demystify the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological implications of such knowledge claims by critiquing and offering empowering reconstructions In so doing, he has demonstrated an unparalleled intellectual courage and patient striving. Ken's early work has been dominated by a critical stance but in later works he has moved toward developing an alternative vision for social life characterized by joint action, performance, relational nature of constructed realities, and cultural inclusiveness.
- Source
- Psychological studies. 57(2012), p.121-125
- Type
- a
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.02
0.02053662 = product of:
0.04791878 = sum of:
0.026331145 = weight(_text_:u in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026331145 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006530081 = score(doc=3261,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.015057558 = product of:
0.030115116 = sum of:
0.030115116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030115116 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Ontologies improve IR systems regarding its retrieval and presentation of information, which make the task of finding information more effective, efficient, and interactive. In this paper we argue that ontologies also greatly improve the engineering of such systems. We created a framework that uses ontology to drive the process of engineering an IR system. We developed a prototype that shows how a domain specialist without knowledge in the IR field can build an IR system with interactive components. The resulting system provides support for users not only to find their information needs but also to extend their state of knowledge. This way, our approach to ontology-enabled information retrieval addresses both the engineering aspect described here and also the usability aspect described elsewhere.
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
- Source
- http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/f/u/fuf1/hermeneus/Hermeneus_architecture.pdf
- Type
- a
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.02
0.020313725 = product of:
0.04739869 = sum of:
0.021165324 = product of:
0.04233065 = sum of:
0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233065 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006156619 = weight(_text_:a in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006156619 = score(doc=2474,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.020076746 = product of:
0.040153492 = sum of:
0.040153492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040153492 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Van Dijck builds up an example of actual XFML by showing how to organize tourist information about what restaurants in what cities feature which kind of music: <facet id="city">City</facet> and <topic id="ny" facetid="city"><name>New York</name></topic> combine to mean that New York is the name of a city internally represented as "ny". It is written in the usual clear and practical style of articles on xml.com. Highly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in XFML.
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.02
0.019592265 = product of:
0.06857292 = sum of:
0.058838453 = product of:
0.23535381 = sum of:
0.23535381 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23535381 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3140742 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0097344695 = weight(_text_:a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0097344695 = score(doc=230,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
- Type
- a
-
Apps, A.; MacIntyre, R.; Heery, R.; Patel, M.; Salokhe, G.: Zetoc : a Dublin Core Based Current Awareness Service (2002)
0.02
0.019190311 = product of:
0.06716609 = sum of:
0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057740733 = score(doc=1280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
0.00942536 = weight(_text_:a in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00942536 = score(doc=1280,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
-
Euzenat, J.; Bach, T.Le; Barrasa, J.; Bouquet, P.; Bo, J.De; Dieng, R.; Ehrig, M.; Hauswirth, M.; Jarrar, M.; Lara, R.; Maynard, D.; Napoli, A.; Stamou, G.; Stuckenschmidt, H.; Shvaiko, P.; Tessaris, S.; Acker, S. Van; Zaihrayeu, I.: State of the art on ontology alignment (2004)
0.02
0.01911108 = product of:
0.04459252 = sum of:
0.014966144 = product of:
0.029932288 = sum of:
0.029932288 = weight(_text_:p in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029932288 = score(doc=172,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.023096293 = weight(_text_:g in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023096293 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.165991 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006530081 = score(doc=172,freq=18.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In this document we provide an overall view of the state of the art in ontology alignment. It is organised as a description of the need for ontology alignment, a presentation of the techniques currently in use for ontology alignment and a presentation of existing systems. The state of the art is not restricted to any discipline and consider as some form of ontology alignment the work made on schema matching within the database area for instance. Heterogeneity problems on the semantic web can be solved, for some of them, by aligning heterogeneous ontologies. This is illustrated through a number of use cases of ontology alignment. Aligning ontologies consists of providing the corresponding entities in these ontologies. This process is precisely defined in deliverable D2.2.1. The current deliverable presents the many techniques currently used for implementing this process. These techniques are classified along the many features that can be found in ontologies (labels, structures, instances, semantics). They resort to many different disciplines such as statistics, machine learning or data analysis. The alignment itself is obtained by combining these techniques towards a particular goal (obtaining an alignment with particular features, optimising some criterion). Several combination techniques are also presented. Finally, these techniques have been experimented in various systems for ontology alignment or schema matching. Several such systems are presented briefly in the last section and characterized by the above techniques they rely on. The conclusion is that many techniques are available for achieving ontology alignment and many systems have been developed based on these techniques. However, few comparisons and few integration is actually provided by these implementations. This deliverable serves as a basis for considering further action along these two lines. It provide a first inventory of what should be evaluated and suggests what evaluation criterion can be used.
- Content
- This document is part of a research project funded by the IST Programme of the Commission of the European Communities as project number IST-2004-507482.
-
Baker, T.; Dekkers, M.; Heery, R.; Patel, M.; Salokhe, G.: What Terms Does Your Metadata Use? : Application Profiles as Machine-Understandable Narratives (2002)
0.02
0.018052135 = product of:
0.063182466 = sum of:
0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057740733 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
0.0054417336 = weight(_text_:a in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054417336 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
